Literature DB >> 17545524

Strong time dependence of the 76-gene prognostic signature for node-negative breast cancer patients in the TRANSBIG multicenter independent validation series.

Christine Desmedt1, Fanny Piette, Sherene Loi, Yixin Wang, Françoise Lallemand, Benjamin Haibe-Kains, Giuseppe Viale, Mauro Delorenzi, Yi Zhang, Mahasti Saghatchian d'Assignies, Jonas Bergh, Rosette Lidereau, Paul Ellis, Adrian L Harris, Jan G M Klijn, John A Foekens, Fatima Cardoso, Martine J Piccart, Marc Buyse, Christos Sotiriou.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recently, a 76-gene prognostic signature able to predict distant metastases in lymph node-negative (N(-)) breast cancer patients was reported. The aims of this study conducted by TRANSBIG were to independently validate these results and to compare the outcome with clinical risk assessment. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Gene expression profiling of frozen samples from 198 N(-) systemically untreated patients was done at the Bordet Institute, blinded to clinical data and independent of Veridex. Genomic risk was defined by Veridex, blinded to clinical data. Survival analyses, done by an independent statistician, were done with the genomic risk and adjusted for the clinical risk, defined by Adjuvant! Online.
RESULTS: The actual 5- and 10-year time to distant metastasis were 98% (88-100%) and 94% (83-98%), respectively, for the good profile group and 76% (68-82%) and 73% (65-79%), respectively, for the poor profile group. The actual 5- and 10-year overall survival were 98% (88-100%) and 87% (73-94%), respectively, for the good profile group and 84% (77-89%) and 72% (63-78%), respectively, for the poor profile group. We observed a strong time dependence of this signature, leading to an adjusted hazard ratio of 13.58 (1.85-99.63) and 8.20 (1.10-60.90) at 5 years and 5.11 (1.57-16.67) and 2.55 (1.07-6.10) at 10 years for time to distant metastasis and overall survival, respectively.
CONCLUSION: This independent validation confirmed the performance of the 76-gene signature and adds to the growing evidence that gene expression signatures are of clinical relevance, especially for identifying patients at high risk of early distant metastases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17545524     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2765

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  439 in total

1.  Identification of human triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and preclinical models for selection of targeted therapies.

Authors:  Brian D Lehmann; Joshua A Bauer; Xi Chen; Melinda E Sanders; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Yu Shyr; Jennifer A Pietenpol
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Opposing effects of Runx2 and estradiol on breast cancer cell proliferation: in vitro identification of reciprocally regulated gene signature related to clinical letrozole responsiveness.

Authors:  Nyam-Osor Chimge; Sanjeev K Baniwal; Jingqin Luo; Simon Coetzee; Omar Khalid; Benjamin P Berman; Debu Tripathy; Matthew J Ellis; Baruch Frenkel
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  TopBP1 mediates mutant p53 gain of function through NF-Y and p63/p73.

Authors:  Kang Liu; Shiyun Ling; Weei-Chin Lin
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Metabolite profiling identifies a key role for glycine in rapid cancer cell proliferation.

Authors:  Mohit Jain; Roland Nilsson; Sonia Sharma; Nikhil Madhusudhan; Toshimori Kitami; Amanda L Souza; Ran Kafri; Marc W Kirschner; Clary B Clish; Vamsi K Mootha
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Biomarkers and surrogate end points--the challenge of statistical validation.

Authors:  Marc Buyse; Daniel J Sargent; Axel Grothey; Alastair Matheson; Aimery de Gramont
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 66.675

6.  ANCCA/ATAD2 overexpression identifies breast cancer patients with poor prognosis, acting to drive proliferation and survival of triple-negative cells through control of B-Myb and EZH2.

Authors:  Ekaterina V Kalashnikova; Alexey S Revenko; Abigael T Gemo; Nicolas P Andrews; Clifford G Tepper; June X Zou; Robert D Cardiff; Alexander D Borowsky; Hong-Wu Chen
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Node-Negative Breast Cancer: Which Patients Should Be Treated?

Authors:  Marcus Schmidt
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Overexpression of the EMT driver brachyury in breast carcinomas: association with poor prognosis.

Authors:  Claudia Palena; Mario Roselli; Mary T Litzinger; Patrizia Ferroni; Leopoldo Costarelli; Antonella Spila; Francesco Cavaliere; Bruce Huang; Romaine I Fernando; Duane H Hamilton; Caroline Jochems; Kwong-Yok Tsang; Qing Cheng; H Kim Lyerly; Jeffrey Schlom; Fiorella Guadagni
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Human CST abundance determines recovery from diverse forms of DNA damage and replication stress.

Authors:  Feng Wang; Jason Stewart; Carolyn M Price
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.534

10.  The cyclin D1-CDK4 oncogenic interactome enables identification of potential novel oncogenes and clinical prognosis.

Authors:  Siwanon Jirawatnotai; Samanta Sharma; Wojciech Michowski; Bhoom Suktitipat; Yan Geng; John Quackenbush; Joshua E Elias; Steven P Gygi; Yaoyu E Wang; Piotr Sicinski
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.534

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.