| Literature DB >> 27230109 |
Huaizhu Xun1, Hu Li1, Shujuan Li2, Shujun Wei3, Lijuan Zhang4, Fan Song1, Pei Jiang1, Hailin Yang5, Fei Han6, Wanzhi Cai1.
Abstract
The plant bug, Nesidiocoris tenuis (Hemiptera: Miridae), is one of the most thermophilous dicyphines in agroecosystems and is widely distributed in China. Little is known regarding the genetic structure of N. tenuis and the effect of historical climatic fluctuations on N. tenuis populations. We analyzed partial sequences of three mitochondrial protein-coding genes (COI, ND2 and CytB) and nuclear genes (5.8S, ITS2 and 28S) for 516 specimens collected from 37 localities across China. Analyses of the combined mitochondrial dataset indicated that the Southwestern China group (SWC) was significantly differentiated from the remaining populations, other Chinese group (OC). Asymmetric migration and high level of gene flow across a long distance within the OC group was detected. The long-distance dispersal of N. tenuis might be affected by air currents and human interference. Both the neutrality tests and mismatch distributions revealed the occurrence of historical population expansion. Bayesian skyline plot analyses with two different substitution rates indicated that N. tenuis might follow the post-LGM (the Last Glacial Maximum) expansion pattern for temperate species. Pleistocene climatic fluctuation, complicated topography and anthropogenic factors, along with other ecological factors (e.g. temperature and air current) might have accounted for the current population structure of N. tenuis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27230109 PMCID: PMC4882614 DOI: 10.1038/srep26755
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Results of spatial clustering of the Nesidiocoris tenuis individuals analysis in the programs BAPS based on the combined mitochondrial dataset.
Pie chart with color indicates the proportion of three predicated clusters in each population. Upper-case letters are the abbreviation of 37 sampled locations. KM: Kunming, Yunnan; QJ: Qujing, Yunnan; XICH: Xichang, Sichuan; HNA: Danzhou, Hainan; YUX: Yuxi, Yunnan; DL: Dali, Yunnan; XAW: Xuanwei, Yunnan; YA: Yong’an, Fujian; HZ: Hezhou, Guangxi; XIX: Xinxiang, Henan; GY: Guiyang, Guizhou; ZY: Zunyi, Guizhou; ZHY: Zhenyuan, Guizhou; GM: Gaomi, Shandong; TS: Tangshan, Hebei; WEX: Wenxi, Shanxi; RY: Ruyuan, Guangdong; TX: Tongxiang, Zhejiang; SZ: Shengzhou, Zhejiang; JY: Jiangyin, Jiangsu; LX: Lanxi, Zhejiang; DZ: Dongzhi, Anhui; CHS: Changsha, Hunan; FC: Fengcheng, Jiangxi; BB: Bengbu, Anhui; NG: Ningguo, Anhui; XUC: Xuchang, Henan; DAC: Dancheng, Henan; DEZ: Dengzhou, Henan; XY: Xiangyang, Hubei; SL: Shangluo, Shaanxi; SYA: Yan’an, Shaanxi; XXA: Xi’an, Shaanxi; GUY: Guangyuan, Sichuan; HX: Huixian, Gansu; LZ: Lanzhou, Gansu; LF: Langfang, Hebei. Map was generated with ArcGIS 10.0 (http://www.esri.com/software/arcgis/arcgis-for-desktop) and modified with Adobe Photoshop CS6 (http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop).
Figure 2The median-joining network and splits network for Nesidiocoris tenuis based on the combined mitochondrial dataset.
(A) Haplotype network with the median-joining algorithm. The circle size of haplotype denotes the number of observed individuals. White dots represent lost haplotypes. The shortest trees with median vectors were shown. (B) The splits network constructed by the neighbor-net method. The “H” with a number represents the haplotype shared by different populations.
Figure 3Scatter plots of genetic distance vs. geographic distance for pairwise population comparisons based on the combined mitochondrial dataset (A) and the nuclear data (B). Both analyses are calculated from 1,000 randomizations.
Figure 4Fixation indices correspond to the number of groups (K) defined by SAMOVA analysis based on the combined mitochondrial dataset.
Hierarchical analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) for Nesidiocoris tenuis based on the combined mitochondrial dataset and the nuclear data.
| Gene | Source of variation | d.f. | SS | Percentage | Fixation indx |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Two level | |||||
| Among populations | 36 | 148.376 | 1.81 | ||
| Within populations | 479 | 1571.002 | 98.19 | ΦST = 0.0181 | |
| Three levels | |||||
| Among groups | 1 | 36.723 | 12.97 | ΦCT = 0.1298 | |
| Among populations within groups | 35 | 111.653 | -0.17 | ΦSC = −0.0020 | |
| Within populations | 479 | 1571.002 | 87.20 | ΦST = 0.1280 | |
| Two level | |||||
| Among populations | 36 | 4.075 | 0.28 | ||
| Within populations | 472 | 51.442 | 99.72 | ΦST = 0.0028 | |
| Three levels | |||||
| Among groups | 1 | 0.178 | 0.77 | ΦCT = 0.0077 | |
| Among populations within groups | 35 | 3.896 | 0.15 | ΦSC = 0.0016 | |
| Within populations | 472 | 51.442 | 99.08 | ΦST = 0.0092 | |
*P < 0.05; **P < 0.02; ***P < 0.001. d.f., degree of freedom; SS, sum of squares.
Figure 5Estimates of the migration (M and θ) among four geographic districts of Nesidiocoris tenuis based on the combined mitochondrial dataset.
θ represents the mutation-scaled population size, and M indicates the mutation-scaled migration rate.
Genetic diversity and demographic analysis for two defined groups (SWC and OC groups) and all samples of Nesidiocoris tenuis based on the combined mitochondrial dataset.
| Parameter | SWC group | OC group | All samples |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hd | 0.976 | 0.904 | 0.912 |
| Pi | 0.0048 | 0.0028 | 0.0030 |
| Tajima’s D | −0.112 | −1.998 | −2.057 |
| Fu and Li’s D | −0.277 | −11.268 | −10.598 |
| Fu and Li’s F | −0.261 | −7.703 | −7.240 |
*P < 0.05; **P < 0.02. Hd, haplotype diversity; Pi, nucleotide diversity.
Figure 6Mismatch distributions of the combined mitochondrial dataset in the SWC group (A), OC group (B) and all samples of Nesidiocoris tenuis from China (C). X-axis represents the number of pairwise differences, and Y-axis represents the relative frequencies of pairwise comparisons.
Figure 7Demographic history of Nesidiocoris tenuis reconstructed using Bayesian skyline plots based on COI gene with substitution rate of 0.0177 (A) and the combined mitochondrial dataset with substitution rate of 0.0115 (B). X-axis is the timescale before present, and Y-axis is the estimated effective population size. Solid curves indicate median effective population size; the shaded range indicates 95% highest posterior density (HPD) intervals. LGM represents Last Glacial Maximum.