| Literature DB >> 27229938 |
Mohamed Yousif Ibrahim1,2, Najihah Mohd Hashim1,3, Summaya M Dhiyaaldeen4, Mazen M Jamil Al-Obaidi5, Rashd M El-Ferjani6, Hoyam Adam7, Bassam Alkotaini8, Rami Al Batran5,9, Hapipah Mohd Ali2.
Abstract
Manganese is a crucial element for health. In this study, the gEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27229938 PMCID: PMC4882520 DOI: 10.1038/srep26819
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Chemical structure of MDLA [Mn L (H2O) 3(OH)].
Elemental analysis and spectral characterization for the ligand and its metal complex.
| Ligand Elemental Analysis | Analytical Calculated: C, 64.07; H, 6.79; N, 13.59. |
|---|---|
| Found: C, 64.02; H, 6.75; N, 13.53. | |
| IR (KBr)v | (OH), 3397; v(C = N), 1576; v(C OO-)1506. |
| UV-Vis (DMSO), λmax (€ Mol−1cm−1): | 280 nm (9333, ( |
| 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6) | 2.49 (s, 6H, CH3), 7.50–7.20 (4H, ArH), 7.94 (s, 1H, azomethine), 8.45 (s, 1H, OH) |
| Complex Elemental Analysis | Analytical Calculated: C, 39.88; H, 6.04; N, 8.46 |
| Found: C, 39.54; H, 5.95; N, 8.40. | |
| IR (ATR cm21) | v(OH), 3466; v(C = N), 1659; v(C OO-), 1603 v(M-N), 510 v(M-O)596. |
| UV-Vis (DMSO) | 295 ( |
| 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6)2.30 (s, 6 H, CH3), 7.30–6.76 (4 H, ArH), 8.5 (s, 1 H, azmthen) | |
Figure 2Effect of MDLA on histological sections of the liver and kidney in rats.
(A,B) Rats treated with vehicle. (C,D) Rats treated with 500 mg/kg of MDLA. (E,F) Rats treated with 1000 mg/kg of MDLA. There is no significant difference in the architecture of the livers and kidneys between the treated and control groups (H&E stain, 20× magnifications).
Serum biochemical data for male and female rats intragastrically administered. MDLA for 14 days.
| Parameter | Sex | Normal 0.5% CMC | MDLA 500 mg/kg | MDLA 1000 mg/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| sodium mmol/L | Male | 151.75 ± 0.48 | 150.00 ± 3.14 | 152.00 ± 3.7 |
| Female | 151.3 + 0.63 | 152.8 ± 2.3 | 153.8 ± 1.44 | |
| potassium mmol/L | Male | 4.91 ± 0.15 | 5.08 ± 0.43 | 5.45 ± 0.9 |
| Female | 5.34 + 0.10 | 5.7 ± 0.0.3 | 6.0 ± 0.4 | |
| chloride mmol/L | Male | 102.75 ± 0.75 | 101.50 ± 7.1 | 99.50 ± 6.7 |
| Female | 100.2 + 1.7 | 99.3 ± 9.76 | 101.8 ± 7.5 | |
| carbon dioxide mmol/L | Male | 14.52 ± 0.78 | 14.02 ± 0.83 | 15.05 ± 1.4 |
| Female | 13.6 + 0.87 | 14.7 ± 0.5 | 14.8 ± 1.3 | |
| anion gap mmol/L | Male | 25.00 ± 0.41 | 26.25 ± 2.25 | 27.50 ± 2.22 |
| Female | 28.8 + 0.48 | 27.8 ± 2.1 | 29.0 ± 2.7 | |
| urea nitrogen mmol/L | Male | 9.73 ± 0.55 | 10.52 ± 1.82 | 11.82 ± 1.67 |
| Female | 10.2 + 0.43 | 11.8 ± 1.4 | 12.3 ± 1.6 | |
| creatinine umol/L | Male | 30.50 ± 1.55 | 31.00 ± 1.63 | 32.50 ± 2.96 |
| Female | 28.3 + 1.3 | 28.5 ± 2.6 | 27.3 ± 2.95 | |
| total protein g/L | Male | 59.40 ± 2.5 | 60.00 ± 1.47 | 59.50 ± 2.8 |
| Female | 60.8 ± 1.75 | 60.3 ± 2.29 | 61.3 ± 1.44 | |
| albumin g/L | Male | 13.70 ± 0.41 | 13.75 ± 1.25 | 14.75 ± 0.75 |
| Female | 14.2 ± 0.41 | 15.0 ± 0.71 | 15.0 ± 1.1 | |
| globulin g/L | Male | 49.00 ± 1.96 | 50.00 ± 1.22 | 51.50 ± 3.1 |
| Female | 51.7 ± 2.48 | 52.3 ± 3.57 | 52.6 ± 1.92 | |
| total bilirubin umol/L | Male | 3.65 ± 0.25 | 3.25 ± 0.25 | 3.0 ± 0.0 |
| Female | 3.2 ± 0.29 | 3.0 ± 0.00 | 2.9 ± 0.25 | |
| alkaline phosphatase IU/L | Male | 87.50 ± 3.57 | 89.75 ± 5.2 | 88.75 ± 5.33 |
| female | 96.0 ± 1.87 | 95.3 ± 5.76 | 96.00 ± 4.16 | |
| alanine aminotransferase IU/L | Male | 58.75 ± 1.55 | 59.75 ± 1.18 | 60.00 ± 1.58 |
| Female | 61.3 ± 2.75 | 62.0 ± 1.35 | 62.3 ± 2.06 | |
| Ast IU/L | Male | 189.0 ± 5.51 | 194.8 ± 10.59 | 196.5 ± 12.6 |
| Female | 191.0 ± 4.26 | 193.0 ± 3.58 | 192.8 ± 11.21 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. There are no significant differences between groups significant value at P < 0.05.
Effect of MDLA on gastric ulcer area, inhibition percentage and changes in Alcian blue binding capacity in gastric mucosa of rats.
| Pre-treatment (5 ml/kg dose) | Ulcer area (mm)2 | Inhibition (%) | pH | Gastric volume | ABB (mg Alcian blue/g of tissue) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMC (Vehicle control)* | – | – | 7.03 ± 0.00 | 1.12 ± 0.00 | 723.76 ± 1.05 |
| CMC (Ulcer control) | 972.34 ± 0.97 | – | 3.02 ± 0.02 | 0.33 ± 0.00 | 321.10 ± 0.97 |
| Omeprazole (20 mg/kg) | 138.84 ± 0.71* | 85.72* | 5.62 ± 0.00* | 0.98 ± 0.01* | 743.52 ± 0.69* |
| MDLA (10 mg/kg) | 422.83 ± 0.72* | 56.51* | 4.94 ± 0.01* | 0.72 ± 0.00* | 674.70 ± 0.85* |
| MDLA (20 mg/kg) | 331.25 ± 0.58* | 65.93* | 5.52 ± 0.01* | 0.82 ± 0.00* | 705.94 ± 1.13* |
Ulcer area and Inhibition: ulcer induced by HCl/Ethanol. Gastric pH, gastric volume and Alcian blue bound (ABB): ulcer induced by Shay ulcer. Rats pre-treated with MDLA had significantly reduced areas of gastric ulcers and pH of gastric content for groups pre-treated with MDLA (10 and 20 mg/kg), respectively. All values are expressed as the mean ± standard error mean, the mean difference is significant at (*p < 0.001) level compared to CMC (Ulcer control). Data were analyzed using One Way ANOVA, using the statistics software and analytical solutions SPSS 18.
Figure 3Macroscopic appearance of the gastric mucosa in HCl/Ethanol induced gastric ulcer in rats.
(G1) Group 1 has no injury to the gastric mucosa. (G2) Group 2 have severe injuries in the gastric mucosa. HCl/Ethanol produced extensive visible hemorrhagic necrosis of the gastric mucosa. (G3) Rats in group 3 pretreated with omeprazole have mild injuries to the gastric mucosa, comparing to the injuries observed in group 2. (G4) Rats in group 4 have moderate injuries in the gastric mucosa. MDLA reduces the formation of gastric lesions induced by HCl/Ethanol. (G5) Rats in group 5 have mild injuries in the gastric mucosa. Black arrows show the location of the lesions inside the gastric mucosa.
Figure 4The effect of MDLA on MDA level (μmol/g protein), SOD activity (U/g protein) and PGE2 (pg/mg protein) in gastric mucosal homogenate in rats.
MDLA increased the PGE2 and SOD, and decreased the level of lipid peroxidation (MDA) in the pre-treated groups. All values are expressed as mean ± standard error mean, the mean difference is significant at (*p < 0.05) level compared to CMC (Control). Data were analyzed using one way ANOVA using SPSS 18.
Figure 5The histological effect of MDLA on gastric mucosal (H&E) and gastric tissue glycoprotein-PAS staining in HCl/Ethanol induced gastric ulcer in rats.
(G1) (Normal control group); Rats in group 1 have no disruption of the surface epithelium. (G2) (Ulcer control group); Rats in group 2 have severe disruption of the surface epithelium (red arrow) and necrotic lesions that penetrate deeply into the mucosa (white arrow). Extensive edema of the submucosal layer (yellow arrow) and leukocyte infiltration are present (yellow arrow). (G3) (omeprazole); Group 3 has mild disruption of the surface epithelium, and there is a submucosal edema and leucocyte infiltration (blue arrow). (G4) (MDLA 10 mg/kg); Group 4 has moderate disruption of the surface epithelium with edema and leucocytes infiltration of the submucosal layer (blue arrow). (G5) (MDLA 20 mg/kg); Rats in group 5 showed a mild disruption of the surface epithelium with edema and leucocyte infiltrationin submucosal layer (blue arrow) (H&E staining, 20×). The gastric mucosa in animals pretreated with MDLA or omeprazole (group 3–5) displayed increased PAS staining intensity compared to the rats in group 2, indicating an increase in the glycoprotein content of gastric mucosa in pretreated rats (blue arrows) (PAS stain 20×).
Figure 6Effects MDLA on the immunohistochemistry analysis of expression of Hsp70 and Bax proteins in HCl/Ethanol induced gastric ulcer in rats.
Normal control group (G1), ulcer control group (G2), omeprazole-treated group 20 mg/kg (G3), rats receiving 500 mg/kg of MDLA (G 4), and rats receiving 1000 mg/kg of MDLA (G5). Immunohistochemistry staining of Hsp70 shows over-expression of Hsp70 protein in the experimental groups (G3, G4 and G5). Meanwhile, Bax protein expression was downregulated in the experimental groups (G3, G4 and G5) (magnification 20×).