Literature DB >> 27228964

Intensity-dependent timing and precision of startle response latency in larval zebrafish.

Eileen L Troconis1, Alexander J Ordoobadi2, Thomas F Sommers2, Razina Aziz-Bose2, Ashley R Carter3, Josef G Trapani1,2.   

Abstract

KEY POINTS: Using high-speed videos time-locked with whole-animal electrical recordings, simultaneous measurement of behavioural kinematics and field potential parameters of C-start startle responses allowed for discrimination between short-latency and long-latency C-starts (SLCs vs. LLCs) in larval zebrafish. Apart from their latencies, SLC kinematics and SLC field potential parameters were intensity independent. Increasing stimulus intensity increased the probability of evoking an SLC and decreased mean SLC latencies while increasing their precision; subtraction of field potential latencies from SLC latencies revealed a fixed time delay between the two measurements that was intensity independent. The latency and the precision in the latency of the SLC field potentials were linearly correlated to the latencies and precision of the first evoked action potentials (spikes) in hair-cell afferent neurons of the lateral line. Together, these findings indicate that first spike latency (FSL) is a fast encoding mechanism that can serve to precisely initiate startle responses when speed is critical for survival. ABSTRACT: Vertebrates rely on fast sensory encoding for rapid and precise initiation of startle responses. In afferent sensory neurons, trains of action potentials (spikes) encode stimulus intensity within the onset time of the first evoked spike (first spike latency; FSL) and the number of evoked spikes. For speed of initiation of startle responses, FSL would be the more advantageous mechanism to encode the intensity of a threat. However, the intensity dependence of FSL and spike number and whether either determines the precision of startle response initiation is not known. Here, we examined short-latency startle responses (SLCs) in larval zebrafish and tested the hypothesis that first spike latencies and their precision (jitter) determine the onset time and precision of SLCs. We evoked startle responses via activation of Channelrhodopsin (ChR2) expressed in ear and lateral line hair cells and acquired high-speed videos of head-fixed larvae while simultaneously recording underlying field potentials. This method allowed for discrimination between primary SLCs and less frequent, long-latency startle responses (LLCs). Quantification of SLC kinematics and field potential parameters revealed that, apart from their latencies, they were intensity independent. We found that increasing stimulus intensity decreased SLC latencies while increasing their precision, which was significantly correlated with corresponding changes in field potential latencies and their precision. Single afferent neuron recordings from the lateral line revealed a similar intensity-dependent decrease in first spike latencies and their jitter, which could account for the intensity-dependent changes in timing and precision of startle response latencies.
© 2016 The Authors. The Journal of Physiology © 2016 The Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27228964      PMCID: PMC5199724          DOI: 10.1113/JP272466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  70 in total

1.  Physiological recordings from zebrafish lateral-line hair cells and afferent neurons.

Authors:  Josef G Trapani; Teresa Nicolson
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.441

Review 2.  The Mauthner cell half a century later: a neurobiological model for decision-making?

Authors:  Henri Korn; Donald S Faber
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Spontaneous activity of auditory-nerve fibers: insights into stochastic processes at ribbon synapses.

Authors:  Peter Heil; Heinrich Neubauer; Dexter R F Irvine; Mel Brown
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Basic response properties of auditory nerve fibers: a review.

Authors:  Peter Heil; Adam J Peterson
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 5.249

5.  Recording field potentials from zebrafish larvae during escape responses.

Authors:  Bryan D Monesson-Olson; Eileen L Troconis; Josef G Trapani
Journal:  J Undergrad Neurosci Educ       Date:  2014-10-15

6.  Coding of information in single auditory-nerve fibers of the goldfish.

Authors:  R R Fay
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  The auditory hair cell ribbon synapse: from assembly to function.

Authors:  Saaid Safieddine; Aziz El-Amraoui; Christine Petit
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 12.449

8.  Auditory sensitivity of larval zebrafish (Danio rerio) measured using a behavioral prepulse inhibition assay.

Authors:  Ashwin A Bhandiwad; David G Zeddies; David W Raible; Edwin W Rubel; Joseph A Sisneros
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-09-15       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Patch-clamp recordings from lateral line neuromast hair cells of the living zebrafish.

Authors:  Anthony J Ricci; Jun-Ping Bai; Lei Song; Caixia Lv; David Zenisek; Joseph Santos-Sacchi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Structure and function of the hair cell ribbon synapse.

Authors:  R Nouvian; D Beutner; T D Parsons; T Moser
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 1.843

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  The Brilliance of the Zebrafish Model: Perception on Behavior and Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Avinash Shenoy; Meheli Banerjee; Archana Upadhya; Siddhi Bagwe-Parab; Ginpreet Kaur
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 3.617

Review 2.  Encoding sound in the cochlea: from receptor potential to afferent discharge.

Authors:  Mark A Rutherford; Henrique von Gersdorff; Juan D Goutman
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Enlargement of Ribbons in Zebrafish Hair Cells Increases Calcium Currents But Disrupts Afferent Spontaneous Activity and Timing of Stimulus Onset.

Authors:  Lavinia Sheets; Xinyi J He; Jennifer Olt; Mary Schreck; Ronald S Petralia; Ya-Xian Wang; Qiuxiang Zhang; Alisha Beirl; Teresa Nicolson; Walter Marcotti; Josef G Trapani; Katie S Kindt
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The neuropeptide Pth2 modulates social behavior and anxiety in zebrafish.

Authors:  Lukas Anneser; Anja Gemmer; Tim Eilers; Ivan C Alcantara; Anett-Yvonn Loos; Soojin Ryu; Erin M Schuman
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-02-04

5.  Developmental Exposure to Domoic Acid Disrupts Startle Response Behavior and Circuitry in Zebrafish.

Authors:  Jennifer M Panlilio; Ian T Jones; Matthew C Salanga; Neelakanteswar Aluru; Mark E Hahn
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 4.109

6.  Emergence of consistent intra-individual locomotor patterns during zebrafish development.

Authors:  Jennifer A Fitzgerald; Krishna Tulasi Kirla; Carl P Zinner; Colette M Vom Berg
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Loss of IRF2BPL impairs neuronal maintenance through excess Wnt signaling.

Authors:  Paul C Marcogliese; Debdeep Dutta; Shrestha Sinha Ray; Nghi D P Dang; Zhongyuan Zuo; Yuchun Wang; Di Lu; Fatima Fazal; Thomas A Ravenscroft; Hyunglok Chung; Oguz Kanca; JiJun Wan; Emilie D Douine; Undiagnosed Diseases Network; Loren D M Pena; Shinya Yamamoto; Stanley F Nelson; Matthew Might; Kathrin C Meyer; Nan Cher Yeo; Hugo J Bellen
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 14.136

8.  Developmental exposure to non-dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls promotes sensory deficits and disrupts dopaminergic and GABAergic signaling in zebrafish.

Authors:  Nadja R Brun; Jennifer M Panlilio; Kun Zhang; Yanbin Zhao; Evgeny Ivashkin; John J Stegeman; Jared V Goldstone
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-09-24
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.