Literature DB >> 27227411

Lack of Significant Effects of Chlamydia trachomatis Infection on Cervical Adenocarcinoma Risk: Nested Case-Control Study.

Vitaly Smelov1,2,3, Tarik Gheit1, Karin Sundström3, Alexander Ploner4, Sandrine McKay-Chopin1, Carina Eklund3, Massimo Tommasino1, Joakim Dillner3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A role of Chlamydia trachomatis in HPV-induced cervical carcinogenesis has been reported for cervical cancer but studies on cervical adenocarcinoma are limited.
METHODS: A total of 1,553 cervical smears taken up to 26 years before diagnosis in a large population-based nested case-control study of cervical adenocarcinoma (AC, 132 cases with matched controls), and adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS, 159 cases with matched controls) were tested for C. trachomatis and HPV DNA by a type-specific PCR bead-based multiplex genotyping (TS-MPG) assay.
RESULTS: Only 1.7% of samples were positive for C. trachomatis, with no significant differences between AC/AIS cases and controls. HPV-positivity was detected in 49.3% of C. trachomatis-negative and 65.4% C. trachomatis-positive samples, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: A large prospective study did not find any risk for cervical adenocarcinoma and/or AIS conferred by C. trachomatis infection. IMPACT: C. trachomatis appears not to be involved in cervical adenocarcinomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27227411      PMCID: PMC4881944          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Persistent infection with human papillomavirus (HPV) is a virtually necessary cause of cervical cancer [1]. One of the most common curable sexually transmitted infections (STI) worldwide Chlamydia trachomatis has been associated with an increased risk of cervical cancer [2-4]. While the most of the studies are focused on squamous cervical carcinoma, there was more limited power to study cervical adenocarcinoma, but no association was found [3,5], which is surprising as C. trachomatis primarily infects glandular cells [2]. Some studies relied on seroepidemiology, where it is difficult to rule out residual confounding completely [1]. One study reported no detection of C. trachomatis DNA in 71 archived formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues of cervical adenocarcinoma (5), but cross-sectional studies are less informative than longitudinal studies [1] and C. trachomatis has only been detected in samples taken many years before the cancer, not close to the diagnosis [2]. We previously reported a large prospective study of cervical adenocarcinoma that established a strong association with HPV present many years before cancer diagnosis (6). We now wished to use this large prospective study to investigate possible associations between C. trachomatis and cervical adenocarcinoma.

Materials and Methods

Detailed characteristics of the study have been reported previously [6]. A total of 1,553 β-globin-positive cervical smears collected during the pre-HPV vaccine era (1969–2002) in Sweden before the development of adenocarcinoma in-situ (AIS, 133 cases; mean age at entry and diagnosis: 28 and 37 years, respectively) or invasive cervical adenocarcinoma (AC, 170 cases; 37/43 years) and matched controls (128 and 169; 29/37 and 37/43 years, respectively) were tested for the presence of C. trachomatis and 19 mucosal HPV types (HPV-6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66, 68a and 68b, 70, 73 and 82), using a validated type-specific PCR bead-based multiplex genotyping (TS-MPG, IARC, Lyon, France) assay that combines multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and bead-based Luminex technology (Luminex Corp., Austin, TX, USA), as described elsewhere [7,8].

Results

In total, 1.7% (26/1553) of samples were positive for C. trachomatis (Table 1). The 26 samples corresponded to only 21 distinct subjects. No major difference in C. trachomatis-positivity was observed between the outcomes and case-control status; the odds-ratios (ORs) for the association between chlamydia infection in the first collected smear and subsequent adenocarcinoma were 1.25 for AIS (95% CI 0.34–4.65) and 3.0 for AC (95%CI 0.31–28.84); ORs associated with chlamydia infection in the last smear before diagnosis were not estimable due to the lack of exposed cases (AIS) and controls (AC), respectively (Table 2). The full data set is available as Supplementary Information (S1 Table).
Table 1

Study population and distribution of C. trachomatis positive smears between cases and controls, for all β-globin-positive smears collected in the study.

Adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS)Invasive adenocarcinoma (AC)
CasesControlsCasesControls
Subjects133128170169
Age at first smeara28 (17–71)29 (16–71)37 (17–82)37 (17–82)
Age at last smeara33 (17–72)34 (17–71)41 (20–82)39 (20–82)
Age at diagnosisa37 (20–75)37 (20–75)43 (25–88)43 (25–89)
Time in studya7.4 (0.1–27.0)8.0 (0.2–25.9)6.1 (0.0–21.1)6.0 (0.1–22.2)
Smearsb425 (100)332 (100)422 (100)374 (100)
HPV positiveb323 (76)93 (28)267 (63)87 (23)
CT positiveb10 (2.4)7 (2.1)7 (1.7)2 (0.5)

a Reported in years: median (minimum-maximum)

b Reported as count (percentage)

CT–C. trachomatis HPV–Human papillomavirus (any strain)

Table 2

Risk of cervical adenocarcinoma given by C. trachomatis infection in the first and last smear, calculated as odds ratio via conditional logistic regression where possible.

SmearMatched cases/controlsExposed cases/controlsaOdds ratio95% Conf.int.
AISFirst1285/41.250.34–4.65
Last1280/2NAbNAb
ACFirst1583/13.000.31–28.84
Last1582/0NAbNAb

a Matched case/control pairs that differ in exposure and contribute to the OR estimation, reported as exposed cases/exposed controls

b Could not be calculated due to perfect separation (no exposed cases or controls)

Footnote: AIS–adenocarcinoma in situ, AC–adenocarcinoma

a Reported in years: median (minimum-maximum) b Reported as count (percentage) CT–C. trachomatis HPVHuman papillomavirus (any strain) a Matched case/control pairs that differ in exposure and contribute to the OR estimation, reported as exposed cases/exposed controls b Could not be calculated due to perfect separation (no exposed cases or controls) Footnote: AIS–adenocarcinoma in situ, AC–adenocarcinoma HPV-positivity was detected in 49.3% (n = 753) of C. trachomatis-negative and 65.4% (n = 17) C. trachomatis-positive samples. Because of the overall low numbers, a further analysis of possible interaction between C. trachomatis and HPV status was not feasible.

Discussion

In the current largest prospective study to date of C. trachomatis and cervical adenocarcinoma, with a follow-up period of up to 26 years, C. trachomatis was not associated with increased risks of subsequent invasive adenocarcinoma (AC) and its precursor, adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS). The average age of participants in this study was above 30 years, and it is possible that co-infections/interactions between C. trachomatis and HPV, or other STI, may be of more relevance at earlier age and this may require further studying. A higher prevalence of HPV infections have been found in younger Italian women affected with a C. trachomatis chronic infection from a STI centre than in the ones from an assisted reproductive technology clinic [9]. HPV genotype distribution showed that mostly uncommon low risk genotypes were associated with C. trachomatis [10]. However, while Danish women who reported more than one Chlamydia infection had a statistically significantly increased risk of CIN3+, no association was found between C. trachomatis DNA and subsequent risk of CIN3+ among the ones who were HPV-positive or had a persistent HPV infection at baseline [11]. No association between C. trachomatis status, as assessed by DNA or IgG, and risk of cervical premalignancy, after controlling for carcinogenic HPV-positive status was found in a previous study from the United States [12], which suggested that positive associations between C. trachomatis and cervical premalignancy could have been caused, in part, by an increased susceptibility to HPV infection [12]. However, no studies have been done among the women with cervical adenocarcinoma and the present study is the first of this kind. Moreover, the reports of an interaction between C. trachomatis and HPV in squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix are mechanistically unexplained [1] and further studies on the co-factor role of genital microbiota in promoting malignancies, in particular in high-risk and younger populations, may be warranted.

The analysis dataset on the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and human papillomavirus (HPV) infections in women with cervical adenocarcinoma.

SubjectID–unique subject identifier, RisksetID–unique risk set identifier, CaseStatus–case-control status (1 = case), AgeAtDiag–age at the time of diagnosis, HPVpos–HPV-positivity (1 = HPV-positive), CTpos–Chlamydia trachomatis-positivity (1 = Chlamydia-positive), AgeAtSmear–age at the time of collecting cervial smear). (ODS) Click here for additional data file.
  11 in total

1.  Chlamydia trachomatis and risk of prevalent and incident cervical premalignancy in a population-based cohort.

Authors:  Mahboobeh Safaeian; Koen Quint; Mark Schiffman; Ana Cecilia Rodriguez; Sholom Wacholder; Rolando Herrero; Allan Hildesheim; Raphael P Viscidi; Wim Quint; Robert D Burk
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Prospective study of human papillomavirus and risk of cervical adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Lisen Arnheim Dahlström; Nathalie Ylitalo; Karin Sundström; Juni Palmgren; Alexander Ploner; Sandra Eloranta; Carani B Sanjeevi; Sonia Andersson; Thomas Rohan; Joakim Dillner; Hans-Olov Adami; Pär Sparén
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  HPV and Chlamydia trachomatis co-detection in young asymptomatic women from high incidence area for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Serena Bellaminutti; Silva Seraceni; Francesco De Seta; Tarik Gheit; Massimo Tommasino; Manola Comar
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 2.327

4.  Prospective seroepidemiologic study of human papillomavirus and other risk factors in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Lisen Arnheim Dahlström; Kristin Andersson; Tapio Luostarinen; Steinar Thoresen; Helga Ögmundsdottír; Laufey Tryggvadottír; Fredrik Wiklund; Gry B Skare; Carina Eklund; Kia Sjölin; Egil Jellum; Pentti Koskela; Göran Wadell; Matti Lehtinen; Joakim Dillner
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Abundance of multiple high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infections found in cervical cells analyzed by use of an ultrasensitive HPV genotyping assay.

Authors:  Markus Schmitt; Bolormaa Dondog; Tim Waterboer; Michael Pawlita; Massimo Tommasino; Tarik Gheit
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Chlamydia trachomatis and invasive cervical cancer: a pooled analysis of the IARC multicentric case-control study.

Authors:  Jennifer S Smith; Cristina Bosetti; Nubia Muñoz; Rolando Herrero; F Xavier Bosch; José Eluf-Neto; Chris J L M Meijer; Adriaan J C Van Den Brule; Silvia Franceschi; Rosanna W Peeling
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Chlamydia trachomatis and risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse in women with persistent human papillomavirus infection: a cohort study.

Authors:  Kirsten E Jensen; Louise T Thomsen; Sven Schmiedel; Kirsten Frederiksen; Bodil Norrild; Adriaan van den Brule; Thomas Iftner; Susanne K Kjær
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 3.519

8.  HPV genotypes distribution in Chlamydia trachomatis co-infection in a large cohort of women from north-east Italy.

Authors:  Silva Seraceni; Giuseppina Campisciano; Carlo Contini; Manola Comar
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 2.472

9.  Comprehensive analysis of Human Papillomavirus and Chlamydia trachomatis in in-situ and invasive cervical adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Koen D Quint; Maurits N C de Koning; Daan T Geraets; Wim G V Quint; Edyta C Pirog
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  High prevalence of hpv multiple genotypes in women with persistent chlamydia trachomatis infection.

Authors:  Silva Seraceni; Manola Comar; Francesco De Seta; Claudia Colli; Rossella Del Savio; Giuliano Pesel; Valentina Zanin; Pierlanfranco D'Agaro; Carlo Contini
Journal:  Infect Agent Cancer       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 2.965

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Cervical Cancer Induction Enhancement Potential of Chlamydia Trachomatis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Safae Karim; Tiatou Souho; Mohamed Benlemlih; Bahia Bennani
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 2.  Chlamydia Infection as a Risk Factor for Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Anaanthan Bhuvanendran Pillai; Chin Mun Wong; Noor Dalila Inche Zainal Abidin; Sharifah Fazlinda Syed Nor; Mohd Fathulzhafran Mohamed Hanan; Siti Rasidah Abd Ghani; Nurul Afzan Aminuddin; Nazarudin Safian
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.479

Review 3.  Vaginal microbiomes and ovarian cancer: a review.

Authors:  Jinyun Xu; Jing-Jie Peng; Wenqing Yang; Kun Fu; Yu Zhang
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 4.  The Role of Chlamydia Trachomatis in the Pathogenesis of Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Ana P Arcia Franchini; Beshoy Iskander; Fatima Anwer; Federico Oliveri; Kakargias Fotios; Priyanka Panday; Pousette Hamid
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-01-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.