Literature DB >> 27226594

Preferential Phosphorylation on Old Histones during Early Mitosis in Human Cells.

Shu Lin1, Zuo-Fei Yuan1, Yumiao Han1, Dylan M Marchione2, Benjamin A Garcia3.   

Abstract

How histone post-translational modifications (PTMs) are inherited through the cell cycle remains poorly understood. Canonical histones are made in the S phase of the cell cycle. Combining mass spectrometry-based technologies and stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, we question the distribution of multiple histone PTMs on old versus new histones in synchronized human cells. We show that histone PTMs can be grouped into three categories according to their distributions. Most lysine mono-methylation and acetylation PTMs are either symmetrically distributed on old and new histones or are enriched on new histones. In contrast, most di- and tri-methylation PTMs are enriched on old histones, suggesting that the inheritance of different PTMs is regulated distinctly. Intriguingly, old and new histones are distinct in their phosphorylation status during early mitosis in the following three human cell types: HeLa, 293T, and human foreskin fibroblast cells. The mitotic hallmark H3S10ph is predominantly associated with old H3 at early mitosis and becomes symmetric with the progression of mitosis. This same distribution was observed with other mitotic phosphorylation marks, including H3T3/T6ph, H3.1/2S28ph, and H1.4S26ph but not S28/S31ph on the H3 variant H3.3. Although H3S10ph often associates with the neighboring Lys-9 di- or tri-methylations, they are not required for the asymmetric distribution of Ser-10 phosphorylation on the same H3 tail. Inhibition of the kinase Aurora B does not change the distribution despite significant reduction of H3S10ph levels. However, K9me2 abundance on the new H3 is significantly reduced after Aurora B inhibition, suggesting a cross-talk between H3S10ph and H3K9me2.
© 2016 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chromatin; epigenetics; histone; mass spectrometry (MS); mitosis; post-translational modification (PTM); proteomics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27226594      PMCID: PMC4946945          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M116.726067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  72 in total

Review 1.  MAP kinase-mediated signalling to nucleosomes and immediate-early gene induction.

Authors:  S Thomson; L C Mahadevan; A L Clayton
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 7.727

Review 2.  Phosphorylation of serine 10 in histone H3, what for?

Authors:  Claude Prigent; Stefan Dimitrov
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 5.285

3.  A role for cell-cycle-regulated histone H3 lysine 56 acetylation in the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Hiroshi Masumoto; David Hawke; Ryuji Kobayashi; Alain Verreault
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Histone chaperone Asf1 is required for histone H3 lysine 56 acetylation, a modification associated with S phase in mitosis and meiosis.

Authors:  J Recht; T Tsubota; J C Tanny; R L Diaz; J M Berger; X Zhang; B A Garcia; J Shabanowitz; A L Burlingame; D F Hunt; P D Kaufman; C D Allis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  EpiProfile Quantifies Histone Peptides With Modifications by Extracting Retention Time and Intensity in High-resolution Mass Spectra.

Authors:  Zuo-Fei Yuan; Shu Lin; Rosalynn C Molden; Xing-Jun Cao; Natarajan V Bhanu; Xiaoshi Wang; Simone Sidoli; Shichong Liu; Benjamin A Garcia
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 5.911

6.  Aurora-B phosphorylates Histone H3 at serine28 with regard to the mitotic chromosome condensation.

Authors:  Hidemasa Goto; Yoshihiro Yasui; Erich A Nigg; Masaki Inagaki
Journal:  Genes Cells       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Methylation of H3-lysine 79 is mediated by a new family of HMTases without a SET domain.

Authors:  Qin Feng; Hengbin Wang; Huck Hui Ng; Hediye Erdjument-Bromage; Paul Tempst; Kevin Struhl; Yi Zhang
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2002-06-25       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Drosophila aurora B kinase is required for histone H3 phosphorylation and condensin recruitment during chromosome condensation and to organize the central spindle during cytokinesis.

Authors:  R Giet; D M Glover
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2001-02-19       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Mitotic phosphorylation of histone H3 threonine 80.

Authors:  Sharra L Hammond; Stephanie D Byrum; Sarita Namjoshi; Hillary K Graves; Briana K Dennehey; Alan J Tackett; Jessica K Tyler
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 4.534

10.  2016 update of the PRIDE database and its related tools.

Authors:  Juan Antonio Vizcaíno; Attila Csordas; Noemi del-Toro; José A Dianes; Johannes Griss; Ilias Lavidas; Gerhard Mayer; Yasset Perez-Riverol; Florian Reisinger; Tobias Ternent; Qing-Wei Xu; Rui Wang; Henning Hermjakob
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  15 in total

1.  EpiProfile 2.0: A Computational Platform for Processing Epi-Proteomics Mass Spectrometry Data.

Authors:  Zuo-Fei Yuan; Simone Sidoli; Dylan M Marchione; Johayra Simithy; Kevin A Janssen; Mary R Szurgot; Benjamin A Garcia
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 2.  Transmission of Metabolic Dysfunction Across Generations.

Authors:  Kathleen Jaeger; Jessica L Saben; Kelle H Moley
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2017-01

Review 3.  The Inherent Asymmetry of DNA Replication.

Authors:  Jonathan Snedeker; Matthew Wooten; Xin Chen
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 13.827

4.  Ankyrin repeat and single KH domain 1 (ANKHD1) drives renal cancer cell proliferation via binding to and altering a subset of miRNAs.

Authors:  Maria Fragiadaki; Martin P Zeidler
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  Epigenetically distinct sister chromatids and asymmetric generation of tumor initiating cells.

Authors:  Yongqing Liu; Laura Siles; Antonio Postigo; Douglas C Dean
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 4.534

6.  Symmetry from Asymmetry or Asymmetry from Symmetry?

Authors:  Elizabeth W Kahney; Rajesh Ranjan; Ryan J Gleason; Xin Chen
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  2018-01-18

7.  Superresolution imaging of chromatin fibers to visualize epigenetic information on replicative DNA.

Authors:  Yingying Li; Jonathan Snedeker; Matthew Wooten; Zehra F Nizami; Joseph G Gall; Xin Chen
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 8.  Choreography of parental histones in damaged chromatin.

Authors:  Juliette Dabin; Sophie E Polo
Journal:  Nucleus       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 4.197

9.  Combinatorial Histone H3 Modifications Are Dynamically Altered in Distinct Cell Cycle Phases.

Authors:  Congcong Lu; Mariel Coradin; Kevin A Janssen; Simone Sidoli; Benjamin A Garcia
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 10.  Epigenetic characteristics of the mitotic chromosome in 1D and 3D.

Authors:  Marlies E Oomen; Job Dekker
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 8.250

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.