Literature DB >> 27226497

Perioperative management of antithrombotic treatment during implantation or revision of cardiac implantable electronic devices: the European Snapshot Survey on Procedural Routines for Electronic Device Implantation (ESS-PREDI).

Jean-Claude Deharo1, Elena Sciaraffia2, Christophe Leclercq3, Walid Amara4, Michael Doering5, Maria G Bongiorni6, Jian Chen7, Nicolaus Dagres5, Heidi Estner8, Torben B Larsen9, Jens B Johansen10, Tatjana S Potpara11, Alessandro Proclemer12, Laurent Pison13, Caroline Brunet14, Carina Blomström-Lundqvist2.   

Abstract

The European Snapshot Survey on Procedural Routines for Electronic Device Implantation (ESS-PREDI) was a prospective European survey of consecutive adults who had undergone implantation/surgical revision of a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) on chronic antithrombotic therapy (enrolment March-June 2015). The aim of the survey was to investigate perioperative treatment with oral anticoagulants and antiplatelets in CIED implantation or surgical revision and to determine the incidence of complications, including clinically significant pocket haematomas. Information on antithrombotic therapy before and after surgery and bleeding and thromboembolic complications occurring after the intervention was collected at first follow-up. The study population comprised 723 patients (66.7% men, 76.9% aged ≥66 years). Antithrombotic treatment was continued during surgery in 489 (67.6%) patients; 6 (0.8%) had their treatment definitively stopped; 46 (6.4%) were switched to another antithrombotic therapy. Heparin bridging was used in 55 out of 154 (35.8%) patients when interrupting vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment. Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant (NOAC) treatment was interrupted in 88.7% of patients, with heparin bridging in 25.6%, but accounted for only 25.3% of the oral anticoagulants used. A total of 108 complications were observed in 98 patients. No intracranial haemorrhage or embolic events were observed. Chronic NOAC treatment before surgery was associated with lower rates of minor pocket haematoma (1.4%; P= 0.042) vs. dual antiplatelet therapy (13.0%), VKA (11.4%), VKA + antiplatelet (9.2%), or NOAC + antiplatelet (7.7%). Similar results were observed for bleeding complications (P= 0.028). Perioperative management of patients undergoing CIED implantation/surgical revision while on chronic antithrombotic therapy varies, with evidence of a disparity between guideline recommendations and practice patterns in Europe. Haemorrhagic complications were significantly less frequent in patients treated with NOACs. Despite this, the incidence of severe pocket haematomas was low. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2016. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antiplatelet; Antithrombotic therapy; Bleeding; Cardiac implantable electronic device; EHRA survey; Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants; Pocket haematoma; Warfarin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27226497     DOI: 10.1093/europace/euw127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  7 in total

Review 1.  Safety of Anticoagulation Interruption in Patients Undergoing Surgery or Invasive Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials and Non-randomized Studies.

Authors:  Frédérique Hovaguimian; Sabrina Köppel; Donat R Spahn
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Interrupted versus uninterrupted anticoagulation therapy for catheter ablation in adults with arrhythmias.

Authors:  Ghada A Bawazeer; Hadeel A Alkofide; Aya A Alsharafi; Nada O Babakr; Arwa M Altorkistani; Tarek S Kashour; Michael Miligkos; Khalid M AlFaleh; Lubna A Al-Ansary
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-10-21

3.  Oral anticoagulation management in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device implantation.

Authors:  Eric Black-Maier; Sunghee Kim; Benjamin A Steinberg; Gregg C Fonarow; James V Freeman; Peter R Kowey; Jack Ansell; Bernard J Gersh; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Gerald Naccarelli; Elaine M Hylek; Alan S Go; Eric D Peterson; Jonathan P Piccini
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 2.882

4.  Cost of incorrect application of antithrombotic prophylaxis prior to invasive procedures.

Authors:  Ma Victoria Cuevas; Ignacio Martínez-Sancho; Jana Arribas; Covadonga García-Díaz; Beatriz Cuevas
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Cardiac implantable electronic device surgery with interruption of warfarin forgoing post-operative bridging therapy in patients with moderate or high thromboembolic risks.

Authors:  Andrew Kei-Yan Ng; Pauline Yeung Ng; Eva Wai-Ying Tam; Chung-Wah Siu; Katherine Fan
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2021-04-29

6.  Pocket hematoma after pacemaker or defibrillator surgery: Direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists.

Authors:  John de Heide; Marisa van der Graaf; Marijn J Holl; Rohit E Bhagwandien; Dominic A M J Theuns; André de Wit; Felix Zijlstra; Tamas Szili-Torok; Mattie J Lenzen; Sing-Chien Yap
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2022-03-16

7.  Nine-Year Trends in Prevention of Thromboembolic Complications in Elderly Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Treated with NOACs.

Authors:  Bernadetta Bielecka; Iwona Gorczyca-Głowacka; Beata Wożakowska-Kapłon
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 4.614

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.