Andrew Kei-Yan Ng1, Pauline Yeung Ng2,3, Eva Wai-Ying Tam4, Chung-Wah Siu5, Katherine Fan4. 1. Cardiac Medical Unit, Grantham Hospital, 125 Wong Chuk Hang Road, Hong Kong SAR, China. drandrewkyng@gmail.com. 2. Department of Adult Intensive Care, Queen Mary Hospital, 102 Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong SAR, China. 3. Division of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China. 4. Cardiac Medical Unit, Grantham Hospital, 125 Wong Chuk Hang Road, Hong Kong SAR, China. 5. Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: For patients taking warfarin and undergoing pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator surgery, clinical evidence and guidelines support continuation of warfarin therapy, as opposed to interruption of warfarin therapy with heparin bridging. Interruption of warfarin without post-operative bridging therapy may be a feasible alternative but data is sparse. METHODS: This is a single-arm observational study including adults who had interruption of warfarin therapy without post-operative bridging therapy for cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) surgery performed between 2010 and 2019 in a tertiary referral hospital. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, arterial or venous thromboembolic events. The secondary outcomes were clinically significant device-pocket hematoma and other procedural complications. RESULTS: Of the 411 patients analysed including 257 patients (62.5%) who had mechanical heart valves, the primary outcome developed in 5 (1.2%) patients within 30 days after surgery, including death in 3 (0.7%) patients, transient ischemic attack in 1 (0.2%) patient and non-CNS embolism in 1 (0.2%) patient. Clinically significant hematomas occurred in 24 (5.8%) patients, including 15 (3.7%) requiring additional interruption of anti-coagulation and 6 (1.5%) requiring clot evacuation. Other procedural complications and bleeding events were rare (< 1%). CONCLUSIONS: Warfarin interruption without post-operative bridging therapy for CIED surgery was associated with low thromboembolic risks and acceptable bleeding risk. Randomized controlled trials are required to formulate an optimal approach to anti-coagulation management.
BACKGROUND: For patients taking warfarin and undergoing pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator surgery, clinical evidence and guidelines support continuation of warfarin therapy, as opposed to interruption of warfarin therapy with heparin bridging. Interruption of warfarin without post-operative bridging therapy may be a feasible alternative but data is sparse. METHODS: This is a single-arm observational study including adults who had interruption of warfarin therapy without post-operative bridging therapy for cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) surgery performed between 2010 and 2019 in a tertiary referral hospital. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, arterial or venous thromboembolic events. The secondary outcomes were clinically significant device-pocket hematoma and other procedural complications. RESULTS: Of the 411 patients analysed including 257 patients (62.5%) who had mechanical heart valves, the primary outcome developed in 5 (1.2%) patients within 30 days after surgery, including death in 3 (0.7%) patients, transient ischemic attack in 1 (0.2%) patient and non-CNS embolism in 1 (0.2%) patient. Clinically significant hematomas occurred in 24 (5.8%) patients, including 15 (3.7%) requiring additional interruption of anti-coagulation and 6 (1.5%) requiring clot evacuation. Other procedural complications and bleeding events were rare (< 1%). CONCLUSIONS:Warfarin interruption without post-operative bridging therapy for CIED surgery was associated with low thromboembolic risks and acceptable bleeding risk. Randomized controlled trials are required to formulate an optimal approach to anti-coagulation management.
Authors: Daniel Z Uslan; Marye J Gleva; David K Warren; Theofanie Mela; Mina K Chung; Venkateshwar Gottipaty; Richard Borge; Dan Dan; Timothy Shinn; Kevin Mitchell; Richard G Holcomb; Jeanne E Poole Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2011-11-11 Impact factor: 1.976
Authors: Anthony S L Tang; George A Wells; Mario Talajic; Malcolm O Arnold; Robert Sheldon; Stuart Connolly; Stefan H Hohnloser; Graham Nichol; David H Birnie; John L Sapp; Raymond Yee; Jeffrey S Healey; Jean L Rouleau Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-11-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: David H Birnie; Jeff S Healey; George A Wells; Atul Verma; Anthony S Tang; Andrew D Krahn; Christopher S Simpson; Felix Ayala-Paredes; Benoit Coutu; Tiago L L Leiria; Vidal Essebag Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-05-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Vidal Essebag; Atul Verma; Jeff S Healey; Andrew D Krahn; Eli Kalfon; Benoit Coutu; Felix Ayala-Paredes; Anthony S Tang; John Sapp; Marcio Sturmer; Arieh Keren; George A Wells; David H Birnie Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2016-03-22 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Roberto T Sant'anna; Tiago L Leiria; Thais Nascimento; João Ricardo M Sant'anna; Renato A K Kalil; Gustavo G Lima; Atul Verma; Jeff S Healey; David H Birnie; Vidal Essebag Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2014-12-26 Impact factor: 1.976
Authors: Jens Cosedis Nielsen; Poul Erik B Thomsen; Søren Højberg; Mogens Møller; Thomas Vesterlund; Dorthe Dalsgaard; Leif S Mortensen; Tonny Nielsen; Mogens Asklund; Elsebeth V Friis; Per D Christensen; Erik H Simonsen; Ulrik H Eriksen; Gunnar V H Jensen; Jesper H Svendsen; William D Toff; Jeffrey S Healey; Henning R Andersen Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2011-02-07 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Arnold J Greenspon; Robert G Hart; David Dawson; Anne S Hellkamp; Marc Silver; Greg C Flaker; Eleanor Schron; Lee Goldman; Kerry L Lee; Gervasio A Lamas Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2004-05-05 Impact factor: 24.094