Literature DB >> 27225388

Lymphovascular invasion is an independent predictor of survival in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Ying L Liu1, Anurag Saraf2, Shing M Lee3, Xiaobo Zhong3, Hanina Hibshoosh4, Kevin Kalinsky5, Eileen P Connolly6.   

Abstract

Various prognostic indicators have been investigated in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC)-treated invasive breast cancer (BC). Our study examines if lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is an independent predictor of survival in women receiving NAC. We performed a retrospective analysis in 166 women with operable invasive BC who underwent adriamycin- and taxane-based NAC between 2000 and 2013. The presence of LVI was noted in breast excisions following NAC. Associations between progression-free and overall survival and LVI and other clinicopathologic variables were assessed. Median follow-up was 31 months (range 1.4-153 months) with a total of 56 events and 24 deaths from any cause. LVI was found in 74 of 166 patients (45 %). In univariate analysis, the presence of LVI was associated with worse progression-free survival (HR 3.37, 95 % CI 1.87-6.06, p < 0.01) and overall survival (HR 4.35, 95 % CI 1.61-11.79, p < 0.01). In multivariate models adjusting for breast cancer subtype, LVI was significantly associated with a decrease in progression-free survival (HR 3.76, 95 % CI 2.07-6.83, p < 0.01) and overall survival (HR 5.70, 95 % CI 2.08-15.64, p < 0.01). When stratified by subtype, those with hormone receptor or HER2-positive BCs with no LVI had the most favorable progression-free and overall survival. Those with both LVI and triple-negative BC had the worst progression-free and overall survival. LVI is an important prognostic marker and is associated with worse clinical outcome in breast cancer patients receiving NAC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Lymphovascular invasion; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Survival

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27225388      PMCID: PMC5337480          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-3837-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  39 in total

1.  Gene expression profiling of breast cancer patients treated with docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide within the GEPARTRIO trial: HER-2, but not topoisomerase II alpha and microtubule-associated protein tau, is highly predictive of tumor response.

Authors:  A Rody; T Karn; R Gätje; A Ahr; C Solbach; K Kourtis; M Munnes; S Loibl; S Kissler; E Ruckhäberle; U Holtrich; G von Minckwitz; M Kaufmann
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2006-09-28       Impact factor: 4.380

2.  Chemotherapy response of breast cancer depends on HER-2 status and anthracycline dose intensity in the neoadjuvant setting.

Authors:  T Petit; C Borel; J P Ghnassia; J F Rodier; A Escande; R Mors; P Haegelé
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Preoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (neoadjuvant) for carcinoma of the breast: rationale and safety report.

Authors:  J Ragaz; R Baird; P Rebbeck; A Goldie; A Coldman; J Spinelli
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  1985

4.  Pathological tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using anthracycline and taxanes in patients with triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Kaori Sakuma; Masafumi Kurosumi; Hanako Oba; Yasuhito Kobayashi; Hiroyuki Takei; Kenichi Inoue; Toshio Tabei; Tetsunari Oyama
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Lymphangiogenesis assessed using three methods is related to tumour grade, breast cancer subtype and expression of basal marker.

Authors:  Joanna Niemiec; Agnieszka Adamczyk; Aleksandra Ambicka; Anna Mucha-Małecka; Wojciech Wysocki; Jerzy Mituś; Janusz Ryś
Journal:  Pol J Pathol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.072

6.  Prognostic value of lymphangiogenesis and lymphovascular invasion in invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Sebastian F Schoppmann; Guenther Bayer; Klaus Aumayr; Susanne Taucher; Silvana Geleff; Margaretha Rudas; Ernst Kubista; Hubert Hausmaninger; Hellmut Samonigg; Michael Gnant; Raimund Jakesz; Reinhard Horvat
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  W Fraser Symmans; Florentia Peintinger; Christos Hatzis; Radhika Rajan; Henry Kuerer; Vicente Valero; Lina Assad; Anna Poniecka; Bryan Hennessy; Marjorie Green; Aman U Buzdar; S Eva Singletary; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. III. Vascular invasion: relationship with recurrence and survival in a large study with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  S E Pinder; I O Ellis; M Galea; S O'Rouke; R W Blamey; C W Elston
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 5.087

9.  Local-regional control according to surrogate markers of breast cancer subtypes and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients undergoing breast conserving therapy.

Authors:  Abigail S Caudle; Tse-Kuan Yu; Susan L Tucker; Isabelle Bedrosian; Jennifer K Litton; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Karen Hoffman; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Kelly K Hunt; Thomas A Buchholz; Elizabeth A Mittendorf
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Prognostic significance of a complete pathological response after induction chemotherapy in operable breast cancer.

Authors:  P Chollet; S Amat; H Cure; M de Latour; G Le Bouedec; M-A Mouret-Reynier; J-P Ferriere; J-L Achard; J Dauplat; F Penault-Llorca
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-04-08       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  12 in total

1.  Concurrent use of capecitabine with radiation therapy and survival in breast cancer (BC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Y L Liu; C Chin; B Catanese; S M Lee; S Zhan; K Kalinsky; E P Connolly
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Lymphovascular invasion as a negative prognostic factor for triple-negative breast cancer after surgery.

Authors:  Ki Jung Ahn; Jisun Park; Yunseon Choi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol J       Date:  2017-12-15

3.  Prediction model of lymphovascular invasion based on clinicopathological factors in Chinese patients with invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Sandi Shen; Guihua Wu; Gaofang Xiao; Richang Du; Ningdong Hu; Xu Xia; Haibo Zhou
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  The Benefit of Post-Mastectomy Radiotherapy in ypN0 Patients after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy According to Molecular Subtypes.

Authors:  Won Kyung Cho; Won Park; Doo Ho Choi; Yong Bae Kim; Jin Ho Kim; Su Ssan Kim; Kyubo Kim; Jin Hee Kim; Sung-Ja Ahn; Sun Young Lee; Jeongshim Lee; Sang-Won Kim; Jeanny Kwon; Ki Jung Ahn
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 3.588

5.  Assessment of ERBB2 and TOP2α gene status and expression profile in feline mammary tumors: findings and guidelines.

Authors:  Fernando Ferreira; Raquel Chaves; Daniela Ferreira; Maria Soares; Jorge Correia; Filomena Adega
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 5.682

6.  The prognostic significance of wild-type isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2) in breast cancer.

Authors:  Abrar I Aljohani; Michael S Toss; Sasagu Kurozumi; Chitra Joseph; Mohammed A Aleskandarany; Islam M Miligy; Rokaya El Ansari; Nigel P Mongan; Ian O Ellis; Andrew R Green; Emad A Rakha
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 4.624

7.  Addition of carboplatin-gemcitabine as second-line neoadjuvant chemotherapy in non-responsive locally advanced breast cancer patients to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy and evaluation of factors affecting response: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Dena Firouzabadi; Amirreza Dehghanian; Alireza Rezvani; Laleh Mahmoudi; Abdolrasoul Talei
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Predictors of Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Iranian Breast Cancer Patients

Authors:  Pegah Sasanpour; Saleh Sandoughdaran; Alireza Mosavi-Jarrahi; Mona Malekzadeh
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2018-09-26

9.  Lymphovascular invasion can be better than pathologic complete response to predict prognosis in breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Young Jae Ryu; Shin Jae Kang; Jin Seong Cho; Jung Han Yoon; Min Ho Park
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 10.  Predictive and Prognostic Roles of Pathological Indicators for Patients with Breast Cancer on Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Xinyan Li; Mozhi Wang; Mengshen Wang; Xueting Yu; Jingyi Guo; Tie Sun; Litong Yao; Qiang Zhang; Yingying Xu
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 3.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.