Literature DB >> 27225386

Bond strengths of brackets bonded to enamel surfaces conditioned with femtosecond and Er:YAG laser systems.

Cahide Aglarci1, Necla Demir2, Sertac Aksakalli3, Erhan Dilber2, Ozlem Akinci Sozer4, Hamdi Sukur Kilic5.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare femtosecond and Er:YAG laser systems with regard to enamel demineralization and bracket bond strength. Human-extracted premolars were randomized to three groups (n = 17) depending on the conditioning treatment used for the buccal surfaces: 37 % orthophosphoric acid, Er:YAG laser etching (MSP mode 120 mJ, 10 Hz, 1.2 W), and femtosecond laser etching (0.4 W, 800 nm, 90 fs/pulse, 1 kHz). Metal brackets were bonded with Transbond XT to the conditioned surfaces and light cured for 20 s. The samples were thermocycled (5000 cycles, 5-55 °C) and subjected to shear bond strength (SBS) testing using a universal testing machine. Failure types were analyzed under an optical stereomicroscope and SEM. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) was evaluated to assess residual adhesive on the enamel surface. The results revealed no significant differences in SBS between the Er:YAG laser (7.2 ± 3.3 MPa) and acid etching groups (7.3 ± 2.7 MPa; p < 0.05), whereas a significant difference was observed between the femtosecond laser etching group (3.3 ± 1.2 MPa) and the other two groups (p < 0.01). ARI scores were significantly different among the three groups. The results of our study suggest that laser conditioning with an Er:YAG system results in successful etching, similar to that obtained with acid. The sole use of a femtosecond laser system may not provide an adequate bond strength at the bracket-enamel interface.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Enamel demineralization; Enamel surface conditioning; Er:Yag laser; Femtosecond laser; Shear bond strength

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27225386     DOI: 10.1007/s10103-016-1961-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Med Sci        ISSN: 0268-8921            Impact factor:   3.161


  24 in total

1.  Comparison of shear bond strength of three bonding agents with metal and ceramic brackets.

Authors:  B Haydar; S Sarikaya; Z C Cehreli
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Effect of thermocycling on the shear bond strength of a cyanoacrylate orthodontic adhesive.

Authors:  Samir E Bishara; Raed Ajlouni; John F Laffoon
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces.

Authors:  M G BUONOCORE
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1955-12       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 4.  Dentin- and enamel-bonding agents.

Authors:  B Van Meerbeek; G Vanherle; P Lambrechts; M Braem
Journal:  Curr Opin Dent       Date:  1992-03

5.  SEM-evaluation of enamel surfaces after removal of fixed orthodontic appliances.

Authors:  Felix Stephan Schuler; Hubertus van Waes
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.522

6.  Depth of resin penetration into enamel with 3 types of enamel conditioning methods: a confocal microscopic study.

Authors:  K R Ramesh Kumar; K K Shanta Sundari; A Venkatesan; Shymalaa Chandrasekar
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Enamel demineralization and bracket bond strength when etching with acid and /or Er:YAG laser.

Authors:  M F Lasmar; V G S Reher; R Lalloo; P Reher
Journal:  Aust Dent J       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 2.291

8.  Effectiveness of an Er:YAG laser in etching the enamel surface for orthodontic bracket retention.

Authors:  Jung-Ho Kim; Oh-Won Kwon; Hyung-Il Kim; Yong Hoon Kwon
Journal:  Dent Mater J       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Acid resistance of erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser-treated and phosphoric acid-etched enamels.

Authors:  Jung-Ho Kim; Oh-Won Kwon; Hyung-Il Kim; Yong Hoon Kwon
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Helicobacter pylori and refractory duodenal ulcers: cross-over comparison of continued cimetidine with cimetidine plus antimicrobials.

Authors:  H K Boyd; S Zaterka; J N Eisig; D Chinzon; K Iriya; A A Laudanna; E J Boyd
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of bond strength of resin cement to Er:YAG laser-etched enamel and dentin after cementation of ceramic discs.

Authors:  Artur Ismatullaev; Simge Taşın; Aslihan Usumez
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Shear bond strength of a self-adhesive resin cement to dentin surface treated with Nd:YAG and femtosecond lasers.

Authors:  Mahmut Sertaç Özdoğan; Işıl Karaokutan; Mesut Yıldırım; Kübra Aybüke Aydemir; Ahmet Karatay; Filiz Aykent
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Bond Strength of Metal and Ceramic Brackets on Resin Nanoceramic Material With Different Surface Treatments.

Authors:  Mehmet Kara; Özgür Demir; Mehmet Doğru
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2020-06-01

Review 4.  High-intensity laser application in Orthodontics.

Authors:  Eduardo Franzotti Sant'Anna; Mônica Tirre de Souza Araújo; Lincoln Issamu Nojima; Amanda Carneiro da Cunha; Bruno Lopes da Silveira; Mariana Marquezan
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec

Review 5.  Relevance of Micro-leakage to Orthodontic Bonding - a Review.

Authors:  Karandish M
Journal:  J Dent Biomater       Date:  2016-09

6.  Effect of erbium family laser etching on shear bond strength of enamel surfaces: A meta-analysis-PRISMA.

Authors:  Tao Jiang; Qi Gong; Ying Liu; Pan-Pan Zhang; Li Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Effect of Er: YAG laser etching on shear bond strength of orthodontic bracket.

Authors:  Radwa A Sallam; Eman A Arnout
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.484

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.