Literature DB >> 20215623

A pilot qualitative analysis of the psychosocial factors which drive young people to decline chlamydia testing in the UK: implications for health promotion and screening.

D Richardson1, K Maple, N Perry, E Ambler, C Jurd, M Fisher.   

Abstract

The main objectives of this study are to investigate the psychosocial issues for young people who decline chlamydia testing as part of the national chlamydia screening programme in the UK and to consider the implications for future opportunistic screening. Transcripts of qualitative semi-structured interviews were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis to identify themes. The study involved 14 young people aged 16-24 years who declined chlamydia tests in non-health-care settings as part of the chlamydia screening programme. The study was conducted in educational settings where chlamydia screening is available. Four interlinked themes were identified: stigmatization of young people with chlamydia and who take a test, the feeling of embarrassment, their perception of risk and their beliefs of what the test involves. These beliefs and feelings were pervasive and negatively affected their personal decisions of having a test. In conclusion, understanding psychosocial cultural phenomena in the context of screening programmes for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in young people are important for their success. Chlamydia and STIs remain stigmatized; testing is poorly understood and embarrassing for young people, which impacts the poor uptake for opportunistic screening. Strategies are needed to normalize and de-stigmatize chlamydia and the chlamydia test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20215623     DOI: 10.1258/ijsa.2009.009053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J STD AIDS        ISSN: 0956-4624            Impact factor:   1.359


  11 in total

1.  Vouchers versus Lotteries: What works best in promoting Chlamydia screening? A cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Claudia Niza; Caroline Rudisill; Paul Dolan
Journal:  Appl Econ Perspect Policy       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 4.083

2.  Adapting the Get Yourself Tested Campaign to Reach Black and Latino Sexual-Minority Youth.

Authors:  Samantha Garbers; Allison Friedman; Omar Martinez; Roberta Scheinmann; Dayana Bermudez; Manel Silva; Jen Silverman; Mary Ann Chiasson
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2016-05-24

3.  Knowledge of Chlamydia trachomatis among men and women approached to participate in community-based screening, Scotland, UK.

Authors:  Karen Lorimer; Graham J Hart
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  The SPORTSMART study: a pilot randomised controlled trial of sexually transmitted infection screening interventions targeting men in football club settings.

Authors:  Sebastian S Fuller; Catherine H Mercer; Andrew J Copas; John Saunders; Lorna J Sutcliffe; Jackie A Cassell; Graham Hart; Anne M Johnson; Tracy E Roberts; Louise J Jackson; Pamela Muniina; Claudia S Estcourt
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 3.519

5.  Young People's Views and Experiences of a Mobile Phone Texting Intervention to Promote Safer Sex Behavior.

Authors:  Rebecca Sophia French; Ona McCarthy; Paula Baraitser; Kaye Wellings; Julia V Bailey; Caroline Free
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 4.773

6.  Perceptions of Self-Testing for Chlamydia: Understanding and Predicting Self-Test Use.

Authors:  Rachael Powell; Helen M Pattison; John F Marriott
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2016-05-10

7.  Barriers to sexually transmitted infection testing in New Zealand: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Hayley J Denison; Collette Bromhead; Rebecca Grainger; Elaine M Dennison; Annemarie Jutel
Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 2.939

8.  Young men's views toward the barriers and facilitators of Internet-based Chlamydia trachomatis screening: qualitative study.

Authors:  Karen Lorimer; Lisa McDaid
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Understanding the role of embarrassment in gynaecological screening: a qualitative study from the ASPIRE cervical cancer screening project in Uganda.

Authors:  Flora F Teng; Sheona M Mitchell; Musa Sekikubo; Christine Biryabarema; Josaphat K Byamugisha; Malcolm Steinberg; Deborah M Money; Gina S Ogilvie
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Young people's perceptions of smartphone-enabled self-testing and online care for sexually transmitted infections: qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Catherine R H Aicken; Sebastian S Fuller; Lorna J Sutcliffe; Claudia S Estcourt; Voula Gkatzidou; Pippa Oakeshott; Kate Hone; S Tariq Sadiq; Pam Sonnenberg; Maryam Shahmanesh
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.