Literature DB >> 27224637

Failed Intussusception Reduction in Children: Correlation Between Radiologic, Surgical, and Pathologic Findings.

Aikaterini Ntoulia1, Sasha J Tharakan1, Janet R Reid1, Soroosh Mahboubi1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify causes of irreducible intussusception after contrast enema and to correlate imaging findings with surgical and histopathologic findings.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2005 and 2013, a total of 543 children underwent reduction of intussusception with the use of an enema technique (hereafter referred to as "enema reduction"). The medical records of 72 children (56 boys [mean age, 24.8 months; range, 3.8 months to 10.9 years] and 16 girls [mean age, 14.2 months; range, 1.5 months to 6.9 years) who underwent unsuccessful reduction and were treated surgically were retrospectively analyzed. The data collected included information on the cause of intussusception, the risk factors noted on ultrasound, operative management, outcome, and the length of the hospital stay. The imaging findings for these patients were compared with findings for statistically similar age-matched control subjects.
RESULTS: Ultrasound detected 56 of 57 cases of intussusception, but it failed to detect the lead point in three cases and failed to detect ischemic necrosis in seven cases. Positive predictors of failed enema reduction were the presence of a distal mass and observation of the dissecting sign. Of the 72 patients who underwent surgical treatment of intussusception, 26 (36.1%) underwent laparoscopy, 38 (52.8%) underwent laparotomy, and eight (11.1%) underwent conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy. Surgical reduction was performed in 61.1% of cases, small bowel resection in 19.4%, ileocecectomy in 12.5%, and self-reduction in 69%. Pathologic lead points (noted in 25% of cases) included lymphoid hyperplasia (n = 7), Meckel diverticulum (n = 3), Burkitt lymphoma (n = 3), enteric duplication cyst (n = 2), juvenile polyp (n = 2), and adenovirus appendicitis (n = 1). The length of the hospital stay was significantly longer after laparotomy.
CONCLUSION: The distalmost location of the intussusception mass and presence of the dissecting sign on images obtained during contrast enema have a higher positive predictive value for failed reduction. Screening ultrasound decreases the number of unnecessary contrast enemas performed; however, classic pathologic lead points, such as Burkitt lymphoma and Meckel diverticulum, may be difficult to diagnose with the use of ultrasound. Laparotomy and laparoscopy are equally safe and efficacious in reducing intussusception, with the length of the hospital stay after laparoscopy significantly shorter than that noted after laparotomy. Most failed enema reductions are idiopathic, and pathologic lead points are noted in 25% of cases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  air enema; failed reduction; fluoroscopic reduction; fluoroscopy; intussusception; laparoscopy; laparotomy; ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27224637     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.15.15659

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  18 in total

1.  Intussusception in children: lessons learned from intestinal lymphoma as a rare lead-point.

Authors:  H R Bussell; S Kroiss; S J Tharakan; M Meuli; U Moehrlen
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Predictors of failed enema reduction in children with intussusception: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pyeong Hwa Kim; Jisun Hwang; Hee Mang Yoon; Jeong-Yong Lee; Ah Young Jung; Jin Seong Lee; Young Ah Cho
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Intussusception: past, present and future.

Authors:  Emily A Edwards; Nicholas Pigg; Jesse Courtier; Matthew A Zapala; John D MacKenzie; Andrew S Phelps
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-08-04

4.  Fluoroscopic criteria for on-site evaluation of failed intussusception reduction during air enema technique.

Authors:  Tae Yeon Jeon; Sung-Hoon Moon; Hae Won Kim; Kyunga Kim; So-Young Yoo; Yon Ho Choe; Sanghoon Lee; Jeong-Meen Seo; Ji Hye Kim
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-07

5.  A case of colonic-colonic intussusception in a dog secondary to lymphoma treated with colonic resection and anastomosis.

Authors:  Brian J Thomsen; Emily H Ulfelder
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 1.075

6.  Intussusception and COVID19, Successful Mechanic Reduction, Case Report.

Authors:  Nicolás Guerrón; Luis Mauricio Figueroa
Journal:  Glob Pediatr Health       Date:  2021-05-27

Review 7.  Small Bowel Obstruction.

Authors:  Allison A Aka; Jesse P Wright; Teresa DeBeche-Adams
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2021-07-20

Review 8.  Management of intussusception in children: A systematic review.

Authors:  Lorraine I Kelley-Quon; L Grier Arthur; Regan F Williams; Adam B Goldin; Shawn D St Peter; Alana L Beres; Yue-Yung Hu; Elizabeth J Renaud; Robert Ricca; Mark B Slidell; Amy Taylor; Caitlin A Smith; Doug Miniati; Juan E Sola; Patricia Valusek; Loren Berman; Mehul V Raval; Ankush Gosain; Matthew B Dellinger; Stig Sømme; Cynthia D Downard; Jarod P McAteer; Akemi Kawaguchi
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 2.545

9.  Intussusception in Adults: A Retrospective Review from a Single Institution.

Authors:  Ki Hoon Kim
Journal:  Open Access Emerg Med       Date:  2021-06-14

10.  Clinical prediction rules for failed nonoperative reduction of intussusception.

Authors:  Jiraporn Khorana; Jayanton Patumanond; Nuthapong Ukarapol; Mongkol Laohapensang; Pannee Visrutaratna; Jesda Singhavejsakul
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 2.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.