Literature DB >> 27222440

Comparative Mitochondrial Genome Analysis of Eligma narcissus and other Lepidopteran Insects Reveals Conserved Mitochondrial Genome Organization and Phylogenetic Relationships.

Li-Shang Dai1, Bao-Jian Zhu1, Yue Zhao1, Cong-Fen Zhang1, Chao-Liang Liu1.   

Abstract

In this study, we sequenced the complete mitochondrial genome of Eligma narcissus and compared it with 18 other lepidopteran species. The mitochondrial genome (mitogenome) was a circular molecule of 15,376 bp containing 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs), 22 transfer RNA (tRNA) genes, two ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes and an adenine (A) + thymine (T) - rich region. The positive AT skew (0.007) indicated the occurrence of more As than Ts. The arrangement of 13 PCGs was similar to that of other sequenced lepidopterans. All PCGs were initiated by ATN codons, except for the cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (cox1) gene, which was initiated by the CGA sequence, as observed in other lepidopterans. The results of the codon usage analysis indicated that Asn, Ile, Leu, Tyr and Phe were the five most frequent amino acids. All tRNA genes were shown to be folded into the expected typical cloverleaf structure observed for mitochondrial tRNA genes. Phylogenetic relationships were analyzed based on the nucleotide sequences of 13 PCGs from other insect mitogenomes, which confirmed that E. narcissus is a member of the Noctuidae superfamily.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27222440      PMCID: PMC4879558          DOI: 10.1038/srep26387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


The Ailanthus defoliator Eligma narcissus is a member of the family Noctuidae (superfamily Noctuidae), which has spread all over China. This insect pest completes three or four generations every year. It is an important species that is harmful to many plants of economic importance, such as Ailanthus altissima, Amygdalus persica L., Toona sinensis, and others1. Many studies have been conducted on the biology and chemical pest control of E. narcissus12. However, no research has been conducted on its mitochondrial genome. Insect mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) has been widely used for species identification and for population genetics and molecular evolution studies due to the low or lack of sequence recombination and its maternal inheritance3. In most insects, mtDNA is composed of small, double strands: an L-strand, which is biased in favor of As and Cs, and an H-strand, which has an abundance of Ts and Gs4. Moreover, the mtDNA is a relatively conserved circular molecule of 14–19 kb in length5 and includes 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs: atp6, atp8, cox1, cox2, cox3, cob, nad1, nad2, nad3, nad4, nad5, nad6, and nad4L), large and small ribosomal RNA (rrnL and rrnS) genes, 22 transfer RNA (tRNA) genes and a large non-coding element called the A+T-rich region that contains sequences essential for the initiation of transcription and gene replication6. Lepidoptera (moths and butterflies) is the second largest order in Insecta, accounting for more than 155,000 insect species7. Although the superfamily Noctuidae is the largest superfamily in Lepidoptera, only few mitogenomes of Noctuidae are available in GenBank (Table 1). In the present study, we determined the complete mitogenome sequence of E. narcissus and compared the nucleotide composition, codon usage, tRNA secondary structure and A+T rich region with those of other lepidopteran species. Furthermore, the concatenated nucleotide sequence of 13 PCGs of E. narcissus was used to provide insight into the phylogenetic relationships among lepidopteran superfamilies.
Table 1

Lepidopteran mitogenomes used in this study.

SuperfamilyFamilySpeciesAcc. numberRefference
NoctuoideaNoctuidaeEligma narcissus This study
  Agrotis ipsilonKF16396532
  Helicoverpa armigeraGU18827312
  Helicoverpa assultaKR149448unpublished
  Sesamia inferensNC_015835unpublished
 ErebidaeHyphantria cuneaGU59204933
 NotodontidaePhalera flavescensJF44034234
 LymantriidaeLymantria disparNC_012893unpublished
BombycoideaBombycidaeBombyx moriNC_002355unpublished
 SaturniidaeActias seleneNC_0181339
 SphingidaeManduca sextaEU28678535
PyraloideaCrambidaeElophila interruptalisNC_02175636
 PyralidaeCorcyra cephalonicaNC_016866unpublished
TortricoideaTortricidaeAcleris fimbrianaNC_018754unpublished
  Adoxophyes oranaNC_02139637
GelechioideaOecophoridaePromalactis suzukiellaKM87554238
PapilionoideaPapilionidaePapilio syfaniusNC_02397839
  Teinopalpus aureusNC_014398unpublished
 NymphalidaePolyura nepenthesNC_026073unpublished

Results and Discussion

Genome organization and base composition

The complete mitogenome of E. narcissus is a circular molecule of 15,376 bp in size (Fig. 1), which is bigger than the genomes of A. selene (15,236 bp) and H. armigera (15,347 bp) but smaller than the genomes of P. flavescens (15,659 bp) and M. sexta (15,516 bp). The mitogenome of E. narcissus contains a remarkably conserved set of 37 genes, including 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs: atp6, atp8, cox1, cox2, cox3, cob, nad1, nad2, nad3, nad4, nad5, nad6, and nad4L), large and small ribosomal RNA (rrnL and rrnS) genes, 22 transfer RNA (tRNA) genes and a large non-coding element called the A+T-rich region. The gene order is the same as in other sequenced Noctuidae mitogenomes8910, with a trnM-trnI-trnQ order, which is different from the ancestral trnI-trnQ-trnM order11. The nucleotide composition (A: 40.78%, T: 40.21%, G: 7.68%, C: 11.33%) of the E. narcissus mitogenome is biased toward A+T nucleotides (80.99%), which is a higher percentage than that of six other lepidopterans but a lower percentage than that of M. sexta (81.79%) (Table 2). The positive AT skew (0.007) indicates the occurrence of more As than Ts, similar to some lepidopterans such as H. armigera (0.001)12, O. lunifer (0.030)13, and the Chinese B. mandarina (0.057)14.
Figure 1

Circular map of the mitogenome of E. narcissus. cox1, cox2 and cox3 refer to the cytochrome c oxidase subunits.

cob refers to cytochrome b. nad1-nad6 refer to NADH dehydrogenase components. rrnL and rrnS refer to ribosomal RNAs. tRNAs are denoted as a one-letter symbol according to the IUPAC-IUB single-letter amino acid codes. Gene names with lines indicate that these genes are located on L strand, whereas the others are located on H strand.

Table 2

Composition and skewness in the lepidopteran mitogenomes.

SpeciesSize (bp)A%G%T%C%A+T %ATskewnessGCskewness
Whole genome
 E. narcissus15,37640.787.6840.2111.3380.990.007−0.192
 H. armigera15,34740.547.6940.4311.3480.970.001−0.192
 O. lunifer15,59340.097.5637.7514.6077.840.030−0.318
 P. flavescens15,65940.077.8740.8011.2680.87−0.009−0.177
 B. mandarina15,68243.117.4038.4811.0181.590.057−0.196
 A. selene15,23638.548.0540.3713.0378.91−0.023−0.236
 M. sexta15,51640.677.4641.1110.7681.79−0.005−0.181
PCG
 E. narcissus11,19040.688.4037.7213.2078.420.038−0.222
 H. armigera11,20334.2510.6245.189.9579.43−0.1380.033
 O. lunifer11,26632.4712.0843.2612.1975.73−0.142−0.004
 P. flavescens11,20639.408.9039.5612.1578.96−0.002−0.154
 B. mandarina11,19642.838.2637.0411.8779.870.072−0.179
 A. selene11,23137.938.7439.4413.8977.37−0.020−0.228
 M. sexta11,17840.408.2239.8911.4980.290.006−0.166
tRNA
 E. narcissus145041.528.0040.4810.0082.000.013−0.111
 H. armigera147341.418.1540.3910.0581.810.012−0.104
 O. lunifer166641.787.3239.8611.0481.630.023−0.202
 P. flavescens147441.667.8040.649.9182.290.012−0.119
 B. mandarina147241.787.8139.9510.4681.730.022−0.145
 A. selene145940.378.1640.2311.2480.600.002−0.159
 M. sexta147041.098.1640.6810.0781.770.005−0.145
rRNAs
 E. narcissus212241.895.0042.6010.5184.50−0.008−0.355
 H. armigera218941.754.8943.409.9685.15−0.019−0.341
 O. lunifer215741.964.8240.1913.0382.150.022−0.460
 P. flavescens219841.314.7344.049.9285.35−0.032−0.354
 B. mandarina213443.864.7841.0510.3184.910.028−0.366
 A. selene212639.934.9943.7911.2983.73−0.046−0.387
 M. sexta216841.374.8444.059.7385.42−0.031−0.335
A+T-rich region
 E. narcissus43447.471.1549.082.3096.54−0.017−0.332
 H. armigera32844.511.2250.613.6695.12−0.064−0.500
 O. lunifer31944.51.648.95.093.4−0.047−0.524
 P. flavescens54142.142.2249.725.9191.87−0.083−0.454
 B. mandarina48446.492.6947.932.8994.42−0.015−0.036
 A. selene33943.075.9044.846.1987.91−0.020−0.024
 M. sexta32445.061.5450.313.0995.37−0.055−0.419
In the mitogenome of E. narcissus, there are a total of 34 bp that contain overlapping genes. The 34 bp gene overlap in 11 positions of the E. narcissus mitogenome ranges in size from 1 to 8 bp, and the longest overlapping region is present between trnW and trnC. A total of 192 bp of intergenic spacers are dispersed in 16 regions and range in size from 1 to 52 bp, with the longest spacer present between trnQ and nad2. The length of the intergenic spacers is considerably longer than that of A. selene (137 bp over 13 regions) but shorter than that of O. lunifer (371 bp over 20 regions)913.

Protein-coding genes and codon usage

The 13 PCGs of E. narcissus are 11,181 bp in length, accounting for 72.72% of the entire mitochondrial genome. Like other lepidopterans, all 13 PCGs in the E. narcissus mitogenome have ATN as their start codon, except for the cox1 gene, which uses CGA instead. The start codon of the cox1 is rare in insect mtDNA; the canonical codons TTG, ACG, TTA and TTAG are often reported as the cox1 start codons15161718. Ten of the 13 PCGs harbor the complete stop codon TAA, whereas the other three possess the incomplete termination codon T for cox1 and cox2, and TA for nad4 (Table 3). Incomplete stop codons are commonly observed in lepidopteran species919.
Table 3

Annotation and gene organization of the Eligma narcissus mitogenome.

GeneDirectionLocationSizeAnticodonStart codonStop codonIntergenic nucleotides*
trnMF1–6767CAT0
trnIF68–13265GAT−3
trnQR130–19869TTG52
nad2F251–12641014ATTTAA1
trnWF1266–133469TCA−8
trnCR1327–139468GCA2
trnYR1397–146165GTA2
cox1F1464–29971534CGAT−1
trnL2(UUR)F2995–306167TAA0
cox2F3062–3743682ATGT0
trnKF3744–381471CTT7
trnDF3822–388766GTC0
atp8F3888–4052165ATCTAA−7
atp6F4046–4723678ATGTAA−1
cox3F4723–5511789ATGTAA2
trnGF5514–557865TCC0
nad3F5579–5932354ATTTAA42
trnAF5975–603965TGC2
trnRF6042–610463TCG6
trnNF6111–617565GTT5
trnS1(AGN)F6181–625171GCT−1
trnEF6251–631565TTC4
trnFR6320–638667GAA−2
nad5R6391–81321742ATTTAA−2
trnHR8131–819767GTG−2
nad4R8196–95311336ATATA−6
nad4LR9526–9812287ATTTAA23
trnTF9836–989964TGT0
trnPR9900–996364TGG7
nad6F9971–10,507537ATATAA−1
cobF10,507–11,6541148ATGTAA3
trnS2(UCN)F11,658–11,72366TGA30
nad1R11,754–12,683930ATTTAA4
trnL1(CUN)R12,688–12,75467TAG0
rrnLR12,755–14,08913350
trnVR14,090–14,15566TAC0
rrnSR14,156–14,9427870
CR 14,943–15,376434
The 13 PCGs of the E. narcissus mitogenome contain 3727 codons in total, which is within the range of 3687 in H. armigera and 3742 in Agrotis ipsilon. The complete nucleotide sequences of seven lepidopteran insects were downloaded from GenBank to investigate the codon usage among lepidopterans. These mitogenomes are divided into five superfamilies: four species belong to Noctuidae, and the others belong to Bombycoidea, Pyraloidea, Gelechioidea, and Papilionoidea (Fig. 2). We looked at the behavior of codon families in the PCGs and found that Asn, Ile, Leu, Phe, and Tyr are the most abundant amino acids in the E. narcissus mitogenome (Fig. 3). RSCU for Lepidoptera is shown in Fig. 4. All possible codons are present in the PCGs of the E. narcissus mitogenome, whereas some codons, such as GCG, GGC, GTG and CGC, are not found in four other species. Previous research indicates that codons with high G and C content are likely not to be favored, a phenomenon that is found in some lepidopteran insects720.
Figure 2

Comparison of codon usage in mitochondrial genomes in Lepidoptera.

Lowercase letters (a–e) above the species name represent the superfamily that the species belong to ((a) Noctuidae, (b) Bombycoidea, (c) Pyraloidea, (d) Gelechioidea, (e) Papilionoidea).

Figure 3

Codon distribution in Lepidoptera.

CDspT, codons per thousand codons.

Figure 4

The mitochondrial genome relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) across five superfamilies in Lepidoptera.

Codon families are provided on the X axis. Codons indicated above the bar are not present in the mitogenome.

Ribosomal RNA genes and transfer RNA genes

As with all other insect mitogenome sequences, there were two rRNAs in E. narcissus with a total length of 2122 bp. The large ribosomal gene (rrnL), located between trnL1(CUN) and trnV, had a length of 1335 bp, whereas the small one (rrnS), located between trnV and the A+T- rich region, had a length of 786 bp. The negative AT skew (−0.335) indicated the occurrence of more Ts than As. The A+T content of the two rRNA genes was 84.50%, which was within the range of 82.15% in O. lunifer and 85.42% in M. sexta (Table 2). The E. narcissus mitogenome contained 22 tRNAs interspersed throughout the entire genome and ranging in size from 63 to 71 bp, which comprised 1450 bp of the total mitogenome overall. Of these genes, 14 were encoded by the H-strand, and eight were encoded by the L-strand. The predicted structures of the tRNAs are shown in Fig. 5. The A+T content of the 22 tRNAs was 82.00%, with a positive AT skew (0.013). A total of 11 mismatched base pairs were identified in the tRNAs of E. narcissus, three of them being mismatched base pairs (1 A–A and 2 U-U) and eight being G-U wobble pairs. In many insect mitogenomes, the trnS1 (AGN) gene has an unusual secondary structure lacking a stable stem-loop structure in the DHU arm919; however, we found that all the tRNA genes in E. narcissus could be folded into the expected typical cloverleaf secondary structure observed in mitochondrial tRNA genes. All of the secondary structures were drawn using the RNA structure program.
Figure 5

Predicted secondary cloverleaf structures of E. narcissus tRNA genes.

The A+T-rich region

The A+T-rich region, known for the initiation of replication in vertebrates and invertebrates, is located between the rrnS and trnM genes in E. narcissus. This region is 434 bp in length, which is longer than the regions in A. selene (339 bp) and M. sexta (324 bp) but shorter than the regions in Chinese B. mandarina (484 bp) and P. flavescens (541 bp) (Table 2). The region contains the highest A+T content (96.54%) in the mitogenome. There are some conserved structures observed in the E. narcissus A+T-rich region, including the motif ‘ATAGA’ followed by an 19 bp poly-T stretch, the motif ‘ATTTA’ followed by a microsatellite-like (AT) motif 6 and a poly-A element upstream of the trnM gene (Fig. 6). The poly-T is located upstream of the rrnS 5′-end and is preceded by the ‘ATAGA’ motif, a structural feature that is found in the majority of lepidopteran insects (Fig. 7). Previous research indicates that the poly-T element may be involved in controlling transcription and replication initiation21. Two repeat elements are found in the A+T-rich region of the E. narcissus mitogenome. Some lepidopteran insects also have repeat elements in the A+T-rich region. The A+T-rich region of S. longistyla harbors two repeat elements22, whereas the C. medinalis and C. suppressalis mitogenomes contain a duplicated 25 bp repeat element and a duplicated 36 bp repeat element, respectively20.
Figure 6

Features present in the A+T-rich region of E. narcissus.

The motif, poly-T stretch, microsatellite T/A repeat sequences and poly-A stretch are colored in red, green, blue and purple, respectively.

Figure 7

Sequence alignment of the partial D-loop region of 10 moth species.

The boxed nucleotides indicate the ‘ATAGA’ conserved motif.

Phylogenetic analyses

In this study, the mitogenomes of 18 lepidopteran species representing six lepidopteran superfamilies (Noctuoidea, Bombycoidea, Pyraloidea, Tortricoidea, Geometroidea, Papilionoidea) were downloaded from GenBank. The phylogenetic relationships among the superfamilies of Lepidoptera were reconstructed based on concatenated nucleotide sequences of 13 PCGs by using the maximum likelihood (ML) method (Fig. 8). The phylogenetic analyses show that E. narcissus was within Noctuidae. Noctuidae is closely related to Bombycoidea. Although these results do not conflict with other published trees723, more studies of a variety of species are needed to provide further insights into the relationships among Noctuidae species.
Figure 8

Phylogenetic analysis of lepidopteran insects.

The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the maximum likelihood (ML) method, and bootstrap values (1000 repetitions) of the branches were indicated. D. incompta (NC_025936) and A. gambiae (NC_002084) were used as outgroups.

Materials and Methods

Sample collection and DNA extraction

No specific permits were required for the insect collection necessary for this study. E. narcissus larvae were collected in Hefei city, China. Specimens identified as E. narcissus were preserved in 100% ethanol and stored at −80 °C. Total genomic DNA was extracted with the Aidlab Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Aidlab Co., Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The DNA was examined using 1% agarose gels and was then used for PCR amplification of the complete mitogenome.

PCR amplification, cloning and sequencing

To amplify the entire mitogenome of E. narcissus, nine pairs of primers were designed based on the known mitogenomes of lepidopteran species (Beijing Sunbiotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) (Table 4). PCR reactions were carried out in a 50 μl reaction volume, including 5 μl of 10× long Taq buffer (Mg2+ plus), 5 μl of dNTP (20 mM), 1.5 μl of DNA template from a single specimen, 2 μl of each primer (10 μM), 35 μl of sterilized distilled water and 0.5 μl (1 unit) of long Taq (Aidlab Co., Beijing, China). The conditions for PCR amplification were as follows: an initial denaturation for 4 min at 94 °C, followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 40 s at 46–57 °C (depending on primer combination) and 1–3 min (depending on putative length of the fragments) at 72 °C, as well as a final extension step of 72 °C for 10 min. All PCR reactions were performed in a BIO-RAD thermal cycler.
Table 4

List of primers used to amplify the mitogenome of Eligma narcissus.

PrimerSequence (5′ → 3′)
F1ATAGAATTAAACTATATCCTATA
R1ATCTAAGAGATGTTCCTACTAT
F2TACAATTTATCGCTTATAACTCA
R2TATTAGGAGTTATATATGAGTC
F3TGAAGTTATGAATATTCAGATT
R3ATTATTTAGGTGTCGAATTAAA
F4AGCTGCTAACTTAATTTTTAGT
R4CTGTTTCAGCTTTAGTTCATTCA
F5TTACCATTAAAATTATAACATCT
R5AGATTAATTAATAGATTAATTAG
F6TCAAATTATTCTAAAATCAATCT
R6CAAATCAAAGAATAGTTTAATA
F7CGAAACTAACTCTCTCTCACTC
R7ATATGTACATATTGCCCGTCGCT
F8TAGAAACACTTTCCAGTACCTC
R8ATTTTAAATTATTAGGTGAAATT
F9ATGAACTAAAATACCGCCAAAT
R9ATTAATATTGATGAGTTGATTAT
The above PCR products were resolved by agarose gel electrophoresis (1% w/v) and purified using a DNA gel extraction kit (TaKaRa Co., Dalian, China). The purified PCR fragments were ligated into the T-vector (TaKaRa Co., Dalian, China) and then transformed into competent Escherichia coli DH5α. The positive recombinant clone with an insert was sequenced at least three times (Invitrogen Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China).

Genome assembly and gene annotation

The E. narcissus final consensus mtDNA sequence was performed using the Lasergene software package (DNASTAR Inc. Madison, USA). Sequence annotation was performed using the Online Blast Tool of the NCBI web site (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast). The overlapping regions and intergenic spacers between genes were counted manually. The base composition of nucleotide sequences was described by skewness and was measured according to the following formulas: AT skew = [A − T]/[A+T]), GC skew = [G − C]/[G+C]. The A+T content and relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) values were calculated using MEGA 5.024. Transfer RNA genes were identified using the tRNAscan-SE program software available online at http://lowelab.ucsc.edu/tRNAscan-SE/25. The secondary structures of tRNA genes were analyzed by comparison with the nucleotide sequences of other insect tRNA sequences. The nucleotide sequences of the PCGs were translated on the basis of the invertebrate mtDNA genetic code. Alignments of PCGs from other lepidopteran mitogenome sequences were performed using ClustalX software26. The entire A+T-rich region was subjected to a search for tandem repeats using the Tandem Repeats Finder program (http://tandem.bu.edu/trf/trf.html)27.

Phylogenetic analysis

Along with the E. narcissus mitochondrial genome, 21 available insect mitogenomes were downloaded from GenBank to illustrate the phylogenetic relationships among lepidopteran insects. The mitogenomes of Drosophila incompta (NC_025936)28 and Anopheles gambiae (NC_002084)29 were downloaded and used as outgroups. The nucleotide and putative amino acid regions for each of the 13 PCGs were aligned using ClustalW, as implemented in the program MEGA. To select the conserved regions of the putative amino acids, all alignments were analyzed with the program Gblock 0.91b using default settings30. Phylogenetic analysis was conducted using the maximum likelihood (ML) method, as implemented in the MEGA 5.0 program31. This method was used to infer phylogenetic trees with 1000 bootstrap replicates. Substitution model selection was also conducted based on the lowest BIC scores (Bayesian Information Criterion) using MEGA 5.0. The mtREV24 + G + F model was the appropriate models for the amino acid sequence dataset.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Dai, L.-S. et al. Comparative Mitochondrial Genome Analysis of Eligma narcissus and other Lepidopteran Insects Reveals Conserved Mitochondrial Genome Organization and Phylogenetic Relationships. Sci. Rep. 6, 26387; doi: 10.1038/srep26387 (2016).
  36 in total

1.  Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  J Castresana
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Evidence for multiple reversals of asymmetric mutational constraints during the evolution of the mitochondrial genome of metazoa, and consequences for phylogenetic inferences.

Authors:  Alexandre Hassanin; Nelly Léger; Jean Deutsch
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 15.683

3.  MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods.

Authors:  Koichiro Tamura; Daniel Peterson; Nicholas Peterson; Glen Stecher; Masatoshi Nei; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Mitochondrial genome of the cotton bollworm Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and comparison with other Lepidopterans.

Authors:  Jiao Yin; Gui-Yun Hong; Ai-Min Wang; Ya-Zhong Cao; Zhao-Jun Wei
Journal:  Mitochondrial DNA       Date:  2010-10

5.  Characterization of mitochondrial genome of Chinese wild mulberry silkworm, Bomyx mandarina (Lepidoptera: Bombycidae).

Authors:  Minhui Pan; Quanyou Yu; Yuling Xia; Fangyin Dai; Yanqun Liu; Cheng Lu; Ze Zhang; Zhonghuai Xiang
Journal:  Sci China C Life Sci       Date:  2008-08-03

6.  The complete mitochondrial genome of the fall webworm, Hyphantria cunea (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae).

Authors:  Fang Liao; Lin Wang; Song Wu; Yu-Ping Li; Lei Zhao; Guo-Ming Huang; Chun-Jing Niu; Yan-Qun Liu; Ming-Gang Li
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 6.580

7.  Characterization of the complete mitochondrial genome of Diaphania pyloalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralididae).

Authors:  Bao-Jian Zhu; Qiu-Ning Liu; Li-Shang Dai; Lei Wang; Yu Sun; Kun-Zhang Lin; Guo-Qing Wei; Chao-Liang Liu
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.688

8.  Complete mitochondrial DNA sequence of the sea-firefly, Vargula hilgendorfii (Crustacea, Ostracoda) with duplicate control regions.

Authors:  Katsunori Ogoh; Yoshihiro Ohmiya
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2004-02-18       Impact factor: 3.688

9.  Characterization of the complete mitochondrial genome of the giant silkworm moth, Eriogyna pyretorum (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae).

Authors:  Shao-Tong Jiang; Gui-Yun Hong; Miao Yu; Na Li; Ying Yang; Yan-Qun Liu; Zhao-Jun Wei
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 6.580

10.  The complete mitochondrial genome of the bag-shelter moth Ochrogaster lunifer (Lepidoptera, Notodontidae).

Authors:  Paola Salvato; Mauro Simonato; Andrea Battisti; Enrico Negrisolo
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  8 in total

1.  The complete mitochondrial genome of Damora sagana and phylogenetic analyses of the family Nymphalidae.

Authors:  Naiyi Liu; Na Li; Pengyu Yang; Chunqin Sun; Jie Fang; Shuyan Wang
Journal:  Genes Genomics       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 1.839

2.  The first complete mitochondrial genome for the subfamily Limacodidae and implications for the higher phylogeny of Lepidoptera.

Authors:  Qiu-Ning Liu; Zhao-Zhe Xin; Dan-Dan Bian; Xin-Yue Chai; Chun-Lin Zhou; Bo-Ping Tang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Assessing Genomic Admixture between Cryptic Plutella Moth Species following Secondary Contact.

Authors:  Christopher M Ward; Simon W Baxter
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.416

4.  The Complete Mitochondrial Genome and Expression Profile of Mitochondrial Protein-Coding Genes in the Bisexual and Parthenogenetic Haemaphysalis longicornis.

Authors:  Tianhong Wang; Shiqi Zhang; Tingwei Pei; Zhijun Yu; Jingze Liu
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Structural Features and Phylogenetic Implications of Four New Mitogenomes of Caliscelidae (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha).

Authors:  Nian Gong; Lin Yang; Xiang-Sheng Chen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Organization of the mitochondrial genome of Ramulus irregulatiter dentatus (Phasmatidae: Phasmatidae).

Authors:  Congfen Zhang; Xiaoqiang Guo
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Comparative analysis of mitochondrial genomes of geographic variants of the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar, reveals a previously undescribed genotypic entity.

Authors:  Abdelmadjid Djoumad; Audrey Nisole; Reza Zahiri; Luca Freschi; Sandrine Picq; Dawn E Gundersen-Rindal; Michael E Sparks; Ken Dewar; Don Stewart; Halim Maaroufi; Roger C Levesque; Richard C Hamelin; Michel Cusson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Comparative analysis of the Liriomyza chinensis mitochondrial genome with other Agromyzids reveals conserved genome features.

Authors:  Jing-Yun Chen; Ya-Wen Chang; Si-Zhu Zheng; Ming-Xing Lu; Yu-Zhou Du
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.