| Literature DB >> 27221472 |
Julie Lajoie1,2,3, Genevieve Boily-Larouche1, Kelsie Doering1, Juliana Cheruiyot4, Julius Oyugi1,3,4, Kristina Broliden5, Joshua Kimani1,3,4, Keith R Fowke1,2,3.
Abstract
PROBLEM: Cervical biopsies offer a unique opportunity for studying local immune response. To investigate hormonally induced immune fluctuations in cervical tissues of Kenyan female sex workers, we improved biopsy sampling protocol safety. Here, we report on steps taken to minimize exposure to HIV following two cervical biopsies. METHODS OF STUDY: Women were asked to abstain from vaginal intercourse to limit HIV exposure during wound healing with financial compensation. A comprehension tool for informed consent, on-site detection of prostate-specific antigens indicating unprotected intercourse within 48 hr, and bi-weekly text message reminders were implemented.Entities:
Keywords: Female genital tract; HIV; immunology; mucosal; prostate-specific antigens; safety
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27221472 PMCID: PMC5089664 DOI: 10.1111/aji.12520
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Reprod Immunol ISSN: 1046-7408 Impact factor: 3.886
Figure 1Schematic representation of the study visits. Participants were followed for 5 visits (1 month). The first biopsy sample was collected at visit 1, and a follow‐up visit to monitor the healing process took place 3–5 days post‐procedure (visit 2). The second biopsy (visit 3) was taken 2 weeks later, and healing was monitored 3–5 days later (visit 4). After the 31 days of sexual abstinence, participants came to the clinic for a final exam of the biopsy sites and a final follow‐up (visit 5).
Figure 2PSA‐semiquant cassette test serial dilutions to indicate PSA concentrations. Semens were diluted in PBS. A total of 120 ul of the semen dilutions were loaded on the immunochromatographic test strip cassette (Seratec PSA Semiquant, Germany). Negative test results were defined by the presence of bands in the control (C) and internal standard columns, but not in the test result column (T). A positive test showed bands in the control (C), the internal standard, and the test result columns (T). PSA concentration >1 ng/mL were detectable by the kit, which corresponded to a 10−6 semen dilution as tested by us.
Prostate‐Specific Antigen (PSA)‐Positive Detection in Cervicovaginal Lavages Among Female Sex Workers from Nairobi During the Period of Sexual Abstinence for Post‐Biopsy Healing Purposes; Comparison Between Phase I and Phase II of the Study
| Number of participants with PSA+ test | Phase I ( | Phase II ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| % ( | % ( | ||
| Any visit during the healing period | 63% (10) | 29% (18) | 0.013 |
| Visit 2 (3–5 days post biopsy) | 19% (3) | 10% (6) | 0.365 |
| Visit 3 (Biopsy 2) | 19% (3) | 7% (4) | 0.148 |
| Visit 4 (3–5 days post biopsy) | 25% (4) | 11% (7) | 0.212 |
| Visit 5 (Final follow up) | 25% (4) | 8% (5) | 0.087 |
*Chi‐Square †Fischer's Exact Test.
Baseline Characteristics of Prostate‐Specific Antigen‐Positive and Prostate‐Specific Antigen‐Negative Female Sex Workers During Phase I and Phase II of the Study
| Demographic and Behavioral Characteristics | Phase I | Phase II | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSA− | PSA− | |||
| ( | PSA+ | ( | PSA+ | |
| Median (IQR) | ( | Median (IQR) | ( | |
| Age, in years | 38 (36–44) | 38 (35–41) | 34 (31–39) | 36 (30–40) |
| Duration of sex work, years | 8 (7–10) | 8 (5–12) | 5 (2–10) | 6 (3–10) |
| Number of clients in the last 7 days | 18 (6–30) | 7 (5–14) | 5 (2–8) | 6 (3–8) |
| Reported frequency of condom use with clients& | 100 (100–100) | 100 (87.5–100) | 100 (100–100) | 100 (100–100) |
| Reported frequency of condom use with the regular partner& | 0 (0–100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0–100) |
| Schooling years | 9 (7–10) | 8 (7–14) | 10 (8–12) | 12 (10–13) |
| Number of pregnancies | 4 (3–6) | 2 (2–3) | 2 (2–4) | 3 (1–3) |
| % ( | % ( | |||
| Regular partner | 33% (2) | 70% (7) | 57% (25) | 78% (14) |
| Living with a man | 0% | 0% | 7% (3) | 11% (2) |
| Report consuming alcohol | 0% | 60% (6) | 71% (31) | 72% (13) |
| Sexually transmitted infections (chlamydia or gonorrhea) | 0% | 0% | 2% (1) | 0% |
| Syphilis | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| HIV positive | 33% (2) | 50% (5) | 5% (2) | 28% (5) |
Analysis was performed in the women who completed the 4 study visits. *P < 0.05 between PSA− and PSA+, Mann–Whitney U‐test, **P < 0.01, # P < 0.05 between PSA− and PSA, Fischer's Exact Test, and Frequency of condom use for each participant were calculated as follows : number of sexual intercourses reporting using condom/number of sexual intercourses in the last 7 days × 100.
Visual Inspection of Hyperaemia in HIV‐Uninfected and HIV‐Infected Female Sex Workers from Nairobi, Kenya. The Results from Phase I and Phase II were Merged
| HIV− | HIV+ | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSA− | PSA+ | Overall | PSA− | PSA+ | Overall° | |
| Visit 1 (Biopsy 1) | 2% (1/44) | 11% (2/18) | 5% (3/62) | 10% (1/10) | 0% (0/4) | 7% (1/14) |
| Visit 2 (3–5 days post‐biopsy) | 75% (47/63) | 40% (2/5) | 72% (49/68) | 46% (5/11) | 25% (1/4) | 40% (6/15) |
| Visit 3 (Biopsy 2) | 7% (4/55) | 17% (1/6) | 8% (5/61) | 23% (3/13) | 0% (0/1) | 21% (3/14) |
| Visit 4 (3–5 days post‐ biopsy) | 78% (43/55) | 50% (4/8) | 75% (47/63) | 50% (5/10) | 33% (1/3) | 46% (6/13) |
| Visit 5 (Final follow‐up) | 4% (2/55) | 0% (0/5) | 3% (2/60) | 0% (0/10) | 0% (0/4) | 0% (0/14) |
|
| <0.0001 | 0.0153 | ||||
aChi‐square to compare all visits, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.001, ***P < 0.0001 by Fishers Exact test when compared to visit 1.
bBased on the number of tests available, invalid tests were excluded.
Figure 3Concentration of pro‐inflammatory mediators in HIV‐uninfected and HIV‐infected FSW before and after biopsy sampling. Cervical concentrations of IL‐8, MIP1β, MIP3α, MIP1α, MCP‐1, MIG, IP‐10, IL‐1α, IL‐1β, and TNF‐α were measured by Milliplex (Millipore, Merck KGaA) in the cervicovaginal lavage collected at visit 1 (sampling), visit 3 (sampling), and visit 5 (final follow‐up). The difference in the cervical concentrations of inflammatory mediators at different visits was calculated using the nonparametric Friedman test for repeated measures. When significant, posthoc Dunn's multiple comparisons test was applied to compare between visits.
Proportion of HIV‐Uninfected and HIV‐Infected Female Sex Workers from Nairobi, Kenya, with Cervical Inflammation, Defined as at Least 5/10 CVL Concentrations of Pro‐inflammatory Cytokines above the 75th Percentile. The Results from Phase I and Phase II were Merged
| HIV− | HIV+ | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSA− | PSA+ | Overall | PSA− | PSA+ | Overall | |
| Visit 1 (Biopsy 1) | 16% (7/44) | 11% (2/18) | 15% (9/62) | 20% (2/10) | 25% (1/4) | 21% (3/14) |
| Visit 3 (Biopsy 2) | 9% (5/56) | 33% (2/6) | 11% (7/62) | 15% (2/13) | 0% (0/1) | 14% (2/14) |
| Visit 5 (Final follow‐up) | 15% (8/55) | 0% (0/5) | 13% (8/60) | 10% (1/10) | 25% (1/4) | 14% (2/14) |
|
| 0.8662 | 0.8425 | ||||
Based on the number of tests available, invalid tests were excluded.
Chi‐square to compare overall HIV uninfected and HIV infected for all visits.
Figure 4Proportion of cervical HIV T‐cell targets (CD4+CCR5+ T cells) in HIV‐uninfected and HIV‐infected FSWs before and after biopsy sampling. Cervical mononuclear cells were collected by endocervical cytobrush and ectocervical spatula scraping in PBS at visit 1 (sampling), visit 3 (sampling), and visit 5 (final follow‐up). Cells were stained for live cell discrimination and identification of HIV T‐cell targets (CD3, CD4, CCR5) by flow cytometry. The difference in the proportion of HIV T‐cell targets at different visits was calculated using the ordinary two‐way anova and the Sidak's multiple comparisons test.