| Literature DB >> 27220287 |
Jie Zeng1, Jun-Min Gao1, You-Peng Chen2, Peng Yan2, Yang Dong2, Yu Shen2, Jin-Song Guo2, Ni Zeng1, Peng Zhang1.
Abstract
As important constituents of activated sludge flocs, extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) play significant roles in pollutants adsorption, the formation and maintenance of microbial aggregates, and the protection of microbes from external environmental stresses. In this work, EPS in activated sludge from a municipal wastewater treatment plant (M-WWTP) with anaerobic/anoxic/oxic (A(2)/O) process and a hyperhaline wastewater treatment plant (H-WWTP) with anaerobic/oxic (A/O) process were extracted by ultrasound method. The proteins and polysaccharides contents in EPS were determined by using a modified Lowry method and anthrone colorimetry respectively to analyze the detail differences in two types of WWTPs. Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy and three-dimensional excitation-emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy demonstrated proteins and polysaccharides were the dominant components of the two types of EPS, and the aromatic protein-like substances accounted for a larger proportion in EPS proteins. The results of the aggregation test indicated that EPS were good for the sludge aggregation, and the EPS in oxic sludge were more beneficial to sludge aggregation than that in anoxic sludge. Anoxic sludge EPS in H-WWTP showed a negligible effect on sludge aggregation. Comparative study on EPS of different tanks in the M-WWTP and H-WWTP was valuable for understanding the characteristics of EPS isolated from two typical wastewater treatment processes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27220287 PMCID: PMC4879546 DOI: 10.1038/srep26721
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Contents of the dominant components in EPS from M-WWTP (M) and H-WWTP (H).
| Sludge | EPS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PN(mg/g VSS) | PS(mg/g VSS) | PN/PS | |
| M-anaerobic tank | 42.26 | 43.93 | 0.96 |
| M-anoxic tank | 36.86 | 40.51 | 0.91 |
| M-oxic tank | 34.94 | 35.52 | 0.98 |
| M-secondary sedimentation tank | 41.09 | 38.65 | 1.06 |
| H-anaerobic tank | 56.75 | 59.74 | 0.95 |
| H-oxic tank | 68.63 | 48.41 | 1.01 |
| H-secondary sedimentation tank | 46.77 | 54.38 | 0.86 |
Figure 1IR bands of the EPS from M-WWTP (A) and H-WWTP (B).
Figure 23D-EEM fluorescence spectra of the EPS from M-WWTP and H-WWTP (a) anaerobic tank in M-WWTP; (b) anoxic tank in M-WWTP; (c) oxic tank in M-WWTP; (d) secondary sedimentation tank in M-WWTP; (e) anaerobic tank in H-WWTP; (f) oxic tank in H-WWTP; (g) secondary sedimentation tank in H-WWTP).
Fluorescence spectra parameters of the EPS from M-WWTP and H-WWTP.
| Samples | Peak A | Peak B | Peak C | A/B | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ex/Em | Intensity | Ex/Em | Intensity | Ex/Em | Intensity | ||
| M-anaerobic tank | 275/335 | 983.3 | 225/325 | 1192 | – | – | 0.82 |
| M-anoxic tank | 275/345 | 289.6 | 220/345 | 518.7 | – | – | 0.56 |
| M-oxic tank | 275/330 | 1122 | 225/355 | 1399 | – | – | 0.80 |
| M-secondary sedimentation tank | 275/330 | 600 | 225/335 | 744.3 | – | – | 0.81 |
| H-anaerobic tank | 275/340 | 2716 | 220/345 | 2605 | 270/425 | 1449 | 0.84 |
| H-oxic tank | 280/330 | 1523 | 225/330 | 1588 | – | – | 0.96 |
| H-secondary sedimentation tank | 280/330 | 1412 | 225/325 | 1587 | – | – | 0.89 |
FRI volumetric (values (×107 AU nm2 (mg/L)−1) for 3D-EEM of EPS samples from M-WWTP and H-WWTP.
| Samples | F1,n | F2,n | F3,n | F4,n | F5,n | Summation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M-anaerobic tank | 1.33 | 1.70 | 0.64 | 1.68 | 0.40 | 5.75 |
| M-anoxic tank | 0.40 | 0.80 | 0.23 | 0.48 | 0.11 | 2.02 |
| M-oxic tank | 1.80 | 2.09 | 0.88 | 2.01 | 0.53 | 7.31 |
| M-secondary sedimentation tank | 8.71 | 1.15 | 5.83 | 1.11 | 3.57 | 20.37 |
| H-anaerobic tank | 2.27 | 3.75 | 1.32 | 4.47 | 1.29 | 13.10 |
| H-oxic tank | 1.79 | 1.75 | 0.48 | 2.24 | 0.28 | 6.54 |
| H-secondary sedimentation tank | 1.68 | 1.67 | 0.50 | 2.12 | 0.30 | 6.27 |
Figure 3FRI percentage (Pi,n) values for 3D-EEM analysis of EPS samples from different tanks (M, M-WWTP; H, H-WWTP).
Figure 4Aggregation ability of microbial cells suspension before and after EPS extraction from M-WWTP and H-WWTP (a) anaerobic tank in M-WWTP; (b) anoxic tank in M-WWTP; (c) oxic tank in M-WWTP; (d) secondary sedimentation tank in M-WWTP; (e) anaerobic tank in H-WWTP; (f) oxic tank in H-WWTP; (g) secondary sedimentation tank in H-WWTP).
Kinetic parameters of microbial cells aggregation before and after EPS extractions (M, M-WWTP; H, H-WWTP).
| Sludge M-anaerobic tank | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| With EPS | Without EPS | With EPS | Without EPS | With EPS | Without EPS | ||
| M-anaerobic tank | 2.9 | 3.1 | 89.6 | 86.3 | 3.3 | 0.999 | 0.999 |
| M-anoxic tank | 2.2 | 2.6 | 88.6 | 84.4 | 4.2 | 0.999 | 0.995 |
| M-oxic tank | 2.6 | 2.9 | 90.7 | 85.4 | 5.3 | 0.999 | 0.999 |
| M-secondary sedimentation tank | 5.5 | 5.1 | 87.7 | 85.8 | 1.9 | 0.995 | 0.997 |
| H-anaerobic tank | 2.0 | 1.9 | 84.8 | 84.0 | 0.8 | 0.996 | 0.994 |
| H-oxic tank | 1.8 | 1.8 | 85.3 | 83.1 | 2.2 | 0.999 | 0.995 |
| H-secondary sedimentation tank | 1.9 | 2.2 | 83.7 | 80.7 | 3.0 | 0.996 | 0.994 |