Alice K Asher1,2, Carmen J Portillo1, Bruce A Cooper1, Carol Dawson-Rose1, David Vlahov1, Kimberly A Page3. 1. a School of Nursing , University of California, San Francisco , San Francisco , California , USA. 2. b Institute for Global Health , University of California, San Francisco , San Francisco , California , USA. 3. c Biostatistics & Preventive Medicine , University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center , Albuquerque , New Mexico , USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are curative in most persons with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. However, high cost and concerns about adherence and reinfection may present continued barriers to treatment, particularly for people who inject drugs (PWID). OBJECTIVE: To understand changes in assessments of treatment candidacy, given advances in treatment. METHODS: Clinicians attending the Liver Meeting® in 2014 who reported prescribing HCV treatment in the past three years were invited to complete a survey regarding HCV treatment decisions. Participants assessed their likelihood to treat HCV in PWID in association with time of abstinence from injection drug use and what impacts their decision to provide treatment using interferon and DAAs. RESULTS: 108 clinicians completed the survey; 10% were willing to treat an active PWID (last injection within 30 days) using interferon-containing regimens, and 15% with all-oral regimens. For each increasing time interval of injection abstinence, there was an increase in the odds of a clinician reporting willingness to treat with DAAs (Odds Ratio (OR) 2.57, 95% CI 2.18, 3.03) and with interferon-based treatment (OR 2.22 (95% CI 1.90, 2.61), Reinfection and medication cost were cited as most important concerns when determining candidacy. CONCLUSIONS: A cure is now the norm in HCV treatment, and there is an increasing need to address the barriers to treating PWID, the population with the highest burden of infection. Understanding treatment candidacy assessments is essential to improving uptake. This study provides insight into how clinicians view treatment candidacy in this era of DAAs and can help identify supportive treatment environments and concurrent programs.
BACKGROUND: Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are curative in most persons with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. However, high cost and concerns about adherence and reinfection may present continued barriers to treatment, particularly for people who inject drugs (PWID). OBJECTIVE: To understand changes in assessments of treatment candidacy, given advances in treatment. METHODS: Clinicians attending the Liver Meeting® in 2014 who reported prescribing HCV treatment in the past three years were invited to complete a survey regarding HCV treatment decisions. Participants assessed their likelihood to treat HCV in PWID in association with time of abstinence from injection drug use and what impacts their decision to provide treatment using interferon and DAAs. RESULTS: 108 clinicians completed the survey; 10% were willing to treat an active PWID (last injection within 30 days) using interferon-containing regimens, and 15% with all-oral regimens. For each increasing time interval of injection abstinence, there was an increase in the odds of a clinician reporting willingness to treat with DAAs (Odds Ratio (OR) 2.57, 95% CI 2.18, 3.03) and with interferon-based treatment (OR 2.22 (95% CI 1.90, 2.61), Reinfection and medication cost were cited as most important concerns when determining candidacy. CONCLUSIONS: A cure is now the norm in HCV treatment, and there is an increasing need to address the barriers to treating PWID, the population with the highest burden of infection. Understanding treatment candidacy assessments is essential to improving uptake. This study provides insight into how clinicians view treatment candidacy in this era of DAAs and can help identify supportive treatment environments and concurrent programs.
Entities:
Keywords:
Hepatitis C treatment; abstinence; direct-acting antiviral hepatitis treatment candidacy; hepatitis C cure; injection drug use; people who inject drugs (PWID); providers
Authors: Steffanie A Strathdee; M Latka; J Campbell; P T O'Driscoll; E T Golub; F Kapadia; R A Pollini; R S Garfein; D L Thomas; H Hagan Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2005-04-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Kris V Kowdley; Eric Lawitz; Israel Crespo; Tarek Hassanein; Mitchell N Davis; Michael DeMicco; David E Bernstein; Nezam Afdhal; John M Vierling; Stuart C Gordon; Jane K Anderson; Robert H Hyland; Hadas Dvory-Sobol; Di An; Robert G Hindes; Efsevia Albanis; William T Symonds; M Michelle Berrey; David R Nelson; Ira M Jacobson Journal: Lancet Date: 2013-03-15 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Asher J Schranz; Jessica Barrett; Christopher B Hurt; Carlos Malvestutto; William C Miller Journal: Curr HIV/AIDS Rep Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 5.071
Authors: Oluwaseun Falade-Nwulia; Risha Irvin; Alana Merkow; Mark Sulkowski; Alexander Niculescu; Yngvild Olsen; Kenneth Stoller; David L Thomas; Carl Latkin; Shruti H Mehta Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2019-01-30
Authors: Eshan U Patel; Sunil S Solomon; Allison M Mcfall; Aylur K Srikrishnan; Amrose Pradeep; Paneerselvam Nandagopal; Oliver Laeyendecker; Aaron A R Tobian; David L Thomas; Mark S Sulkowski; M Suresh Kumar; Shruti H Mehta Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2018-04-19
Authors: Judith I Tsui; Claire M Miller; John D Scott; Maria A Corcorran; Julia C Dombrowski; Sara N Glick Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2018-12-26 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Xinyi Jiang; Hyun Jin Song; Wei Wang; Linda Henry; Lindsey M Childs-Kean; Vincent Lo Re; Haesuk Park Journal: J Manag Care Spec Pharm Date: 2021-07