Eshan U Patel1, Sunil S Solomon2, Allison M Mcfall3, Aylur K Srikrishnan4, Amrose Pradeep4, Paneerselvam Nandagopal4, Oliver Laeyendecker5, Aaron A R Tobian6, David L Thomas7, Mark S Sulkowski7, M Suresh Kumar4, Shruti H Mehta8. 1. Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 2. Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; YR Gaitonde Centre for AIDS Research and Education (YRGCARE), Chennai, India. 3. Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. 4. YR Gaitonde Centre for AIDS Research and Education (YRGCARE), Chennai, India. 5. Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Baltimore, MD, USA. 6. Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. 7. Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. 8. Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: smehta@jhu.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding barriers to hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment among people who inject drugs (PWID) in low-resource settings, particularly in the era of direct-acting antiviral therapies. METHODS: Between March, 2015-August, 2016, a cross-sectional survey was administered to community-based PWID in Chennai, India to examine the HCV care continuum and associated barriers. Adjusted prevalence ratios (APR) were estimated by multivariable Poisson regression with robust variance. RESULTS: All participants were male (n = 541); 152 participants had HCV mono-infection and 61 participants had HIV/HCV co-infection. Only one HCV mono-infected and one HIV/HCV co-infected participant was linked to HCV care. Overall, there was moderate knowledge of HCV disease but poor knowledge of HCV treatment. Higher total knowledge scores were negatively associated with HIV/HCV co-infection (vs. HCV mono-infection), though this was not statistically significant in adjusted analysis (APR = 0.71 [95%CI = 0.47-1.06]). Participants ≥45 years (APR = 0.73 [95%CI = 0.58-0.92]) and participants with HIV/HCV co-infection (APR = 0.64 [95%CI = 0.47-0.87]) were less willing to take weekly interferon injections for 12 weeks. Willingness to undergo HCV treatment improved with decreasing duration of therapy, higher perceived efficacy, and use of pills vs. interferon, though willingness to use interferon improved with decreasing duration of therapy. Most participants preferred daily visits to a clinic for HCV treatment versus receiving a month's supply. Participants ≥45 years (vs. <45 years; APR = 0.70 [95%CI = 0.56-0.88]) and participants with HIV/HCV co-infection (APR = 0.75 [95%CI = 0.57-0.98]) were less likely to intend on seeking HCV care. Common reasons for not having already seen a provider for HCV treatment differed by HIV status, and included low perceived need for treatment (HCV-mono-infected), competing money/health priorities and costs/fears about treatment (HIV/HCV-co-infected). CONCLUSION: Residual gaps in HCV knowledge and continuing negative perceptions related to interferon-based therapy highlight the need to scale-up educational initiatives. Readiness for HCV treatment was particularly low among HIV/HCV co-infected and older PWID, emphasizing the importance of tailored treatment strategies.
BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding barriers to hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment among people who inject drugs (PWID) in low-resource settings, particularly in the era of direct-acting antiviral therapies. METHODS: Between March, 2015-August, 2016, a cross-sectional survey was administered to community-based PWID in Chennai, India to examine the HCV care continuum and associated barriers. Adjusted prevalence ratios (APR) were estimated by multivariable Poisson regression with robust variance. RESULTS: All participants were male (n = 541); 152 participants had HCV mono-infection and 61 participants had HIV/HCV co-infection. Only one HCV mono-infected and one HIV/HCV co-infectedparticipant was linked to HCV care. Overall, there was moderate knowledge of HCV disease but poor knowledge of HCV treatment. Higher total knowledge scores were negatively associated with HIV/HCV co-infection (vs. HCV mono-infection), though this was not statistically significant in adjusted analysis (APR = 0.71 [95%CI = 0.47-1.06]). Participants ≥45 years (APR = 0.73 [95%CI = 0.58-0.92]) and participants with HIV/HCV co-infection (APR = 0.64 [95%CI = 0.47-0.87]) were less willing to take weekly interferon injections for 12 weeks. Willingness to undergo HCV treatment improved with decreasing duration of therapy, higher perceived efficacy, and use of pills vs. interferon, though willingness to use interferon improved with decreasing duration of therapy. Most participants preferred daily visits to a clinic for HCV treatment versus receiving a month's supply. Participants ≥45 years (vs. <45 years; APR = 0.70 [95%CI = 0.56-0.88]) and participants with HIV/HCV co-infection (APR = 0.75 [95%CI = 0.57-0.98]) were less likely to intend on seeking HCV care. Common reasons for not having already seen a provider for HCV treatment differed by HIV status, and included low perceived need for treatment (HCV-mono-infected), competing money/health priorities and costs/fears about treatment (HIV/HCV-co-infected). CONCLUSION: Residual gaps in HCV knowledge and continuing negative perceptions related to interferon-based therapy highlight the need to scale-up educational initiatives. Readiness for HCV treatment was particularly low among HIV/HCV co-infected and older PWID, emphasizing the importance of tailored treatment strategies.
Authors: W El-Akel; M H El-Sayed; M El Kassas; M El-Serafy; M Khairy; K Elsaeed; K Kabil; M Hassany; A Shawky; A Yosry; M K Shaker; Y ElShazly; I Waked; G Esmat; W Doss Journal: J Viral Hepat Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 3.728
Authors: Shruti H Mehta; Becky L Genberg; Jacquie Astemborski; Ravi Kavasery; Gregory D Kirk; David Vlahov; Steffanie A Strathdee; David L Thomas Journal: J Community Health Date: 2008-06
Authors: Jason Grebely; Krista Genoway; Milan Khara; Fiona Duncan; Mark Viljoen; Doug Elliott; Jesse D Raffa; Stanley DeVlaming; Brian Conway Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2007-04-27
Authors: Sunil S Solomon; David D Celentano; Aylur K Srikrishnan; Canjeevaram K Vasudevan; Santhanam Anand; Muniratnam S Kumar; Suniti Solomon; Gregory M Lucas; Shruti H Mehta Journal: AIDS Date: 2009-05-15 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Judith I Tsui; Claire M Miller; John D Scott; Maria A Corcorran; Julia C Dombrowski; Sara N Glick Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2018-12-26 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Eshan U Patel; Sunil S Solomon; Gregory M Lucas; Allison M McFall; Cecília Tomori; Aylur K Srikrishnan; Muniratnam S Kumar; Oliver Laeyendecker; David D Celentano; David L Thomas; Thomas C Quinn; Shruti H Mehta Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2021-07-08