| Literature DB >> 27219111 |
Vivian Berg1, Therese Haugdahl Nøst, Rolf Dagfinn Pettersen, Solrunn Hansen, Anna-Sofia Veyhe, Rolf Jorde, Jon Øyvind Odland, Torkjel Manning Sandanger.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Disruption of thyroid homeostasis has been indicated in human studies targeting effects of persistent organic pollutants (POPs). Influence on the maternal thyroid system by POPs is of special interest during pregnancy because such effects could impair infant thyroid homeostasis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27219111 PMCID: PMC5226691 DOI: 10.1289/EHP152
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health Perspect ISSN: 0091-6765 Impact factor: 9.031
Maternal concentrations of THs, TH-BPs, thyroxine-binding capacity, and maternal characteristics (n = 370).
| Variable | Median (range) | Mean ± SD | Study population reference range |
|---|---|---|---|
| TSH (mlU/L) | 1.55 (0.06, 10.2) | 1.76 ± 1.04 | 0.44, 4.48 |
| T3 (nmol/L) | 2.71 (1.47, 4.75) | 2.75 ± 0.46 | 1.97, 3.73 |
| T4 (nmol/L) | 145 (92.00, 215) | 146 ± 21.1 | 111, 190 |
| FT3 (pmol/L) | 4.59 (2.99, 7.08) | 4.62 ± 0.53 | 3.66, 5.79 |
| FT4 (pmol/L) | 13.0 (9.00, 20.0) | 13.4 ± 1.62 | 10.0, 17.0 |
| Thyroxine-binding capacity | 1.26 (0.84, 1.50) | 1.26 ± 0.09 | 1.07, 1.43 |
| TBG (mg/L) | 36.7 (23.2, 69.6) | 37.2 ± 6.74 | 26.2, 53.3 |
| TTR (g/L) | 0.19 (0.09, 0.27) | 0.19 ± 0.03 | 0.15, 0.25 |
| Albumin (g/L) | 40.0 (33.9, 47.4) | 40.2 ± 2.42 | 36.0, 46.0 |
| Total lipid (mg/dL) | 672 (344, 1,072) | 672 ± 126 | 442, 943 |
| Age | 31 (18, 43) | 31 ± 5.0 | |
| Parity | 1 (0, 4) | 1± 1.0 | |
| Prepregnancy body mass index | 23 (17, 40) | 24.0 ± 4.3 | |
| Body mass index, second trimester | 25 (18, 43) | 26.0 ± 4.4 | |
| Gestational week at blood sampling | 18 (10, 34) | 18.0 ± 3.4 | |
| Physical activity (prepregnancy) | 6.3 (1, 10) | 6.0 ± 1.7 | |
| Pregnancy vector | –0.01 (–2.5, 3.2) | –0.03 ± 0.9 | |
Infant TSH concentrations, infant characteristics and study population specific reference range (n = 370).
| Characteristic | Boys/girls | Median (range) | AM | Study population reference range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | 196/174 | |||
| TSH (mlU/L) | 1.20 (0.07, 7.50) | 1.32 (0.94) | 0.13, 3.90 | |
| Gestational length (days) | 282 (212, 299) | 280 (10.5) | ||
| Age at sampling (hr) | 72 (48, 364) | 74 (23.7) | ||
| Birth weight (g) | 3,595 (1,330, 4,930) | 3,626 (505) | ||
| Head circumference (cm) | 36 (27, 40) | 35.6 (1.46) | ||
| Length (cm) | 50 (41, 57) | 50.3 (2.10) | ||
Figure 1Partial least squares loading plot for TSH and TH concentrations. The plot describes the linear relationship between the independent variables (contaminants and covariates) and the dependent variables (TSH and THs) and how the variables load onto the principal components. POPs circled with a dashed orange line were positively associated with TSH concentrations (marked with a solid orange circle). POPs boxed with a blue solid line were negatively associated with concentrations of T3, FT3, T4, and FT4 (marked with blue squares).
Associations between serum concentrations of POPs with TSH and TH concentrations in pregnant women.
| Predictors | TSH (mlU/L) | T3 (nmol/L) | T4 (nmol/L) | FT4 (pmol/L) | FT3 (pmol/L) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1: SumOCs | ||||||
| Quartile 1: 0.18–0.63 | 90 | — | Reference | Reference | Reference | — |
| Quartile 2: 0.64–0.83 | 90 | — | –0.01 (–0.03, 0.01) | 0.001 (–0.02, 0.02) | 0.001 (–0.01, 0.02) | — |
| Quartile 3: 0.84–1.12 | 91 | — | –0.01 (–0.03, 0.01) | –0.004 (–0.02, 0.02) | –0.01 (–0.02, 0.01) | — |
| Quartile 4: 1.13–4.65 | 90 | — | –0.03 (–0.06, –0.01)* | –0.02 (–0.04, –0.003)* | –0.02 (–0.03, –0.001)* | — |
| Model 2: SumPFASs | ||||||
| Quartile 1: 1.01–8.32 | 90 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Quartile 2: 8.33–11.7 | 90 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Quartile 3: 11.8–15.2 | 91 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Quartile 4: 15.3–45.4 | 90 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Model 3: SumPOPs | ||||||
| Quartile 1: 1.77–9.00 | 90 | Reference | — | — | — | — |
| Quartile 2: 9.01–12.5 | 90 | 0.04 (–0.03, 0.11) | — | — | — | — |
| Quartile 3: 12.6–16.5 | 91 | 0.06 (–0.02, 0.14) | — | — | — | — |
| Quartile 4: 16.6–46.7 | 90 | 0.08 (0.001, 0.16)* | — | — | — | — |
| Model 4: PFDA | ||||||
| Quartile 1: 0.05–0.17 | 90 | — | Reference | — | — | — |
| Quartile 2: 0.18–2.3 | 90 | — | –0.01 (–0.030. 0.007) | — | — | — |
| Quartile 3: 0.24–0.31 | 91 | — | –0.01 (–0.032, 0.005) | — | — | — |
| Quartile 4: 0.32–2.34 | 90 | — | –0.02 (–0.044, –0.005)* | — | — | — |
| Model 5: PFUnDA | ||||||
| Quartile 1: 0.02–0.16 | 90 | — | — | — | — | Reference |
| Quartile 2: 0.17–0.26 | 90 | — | — | — | — | –0.01 (–0.024, 0.004) |
| Quartile 3: 0.27–0.38 | 91 | — | — | — | — | –0.01 (–0.024, 0.004) |
| Quartile 4: 0.39–1.46 | 90 | — | — | — | — | –0.02 (–0.033, –0.003)* |