John L Pearce1, Brian Neelon2, Michael S Bloom3, Jessie P Buckley4, Cande V Ananth5, Frederica Perera6, John Vena2, Kelly Hunt2. 1. Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA. Electronic address: pearcejo@musc.edu. 2. Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA. 3. Department of Global and Community Health, College of Health and Human Services, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA. 4. Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. 5. Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA. 6. Columbia Center for Children's Environmental Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Improved understanding of how prenatal exposure to environmental mixtures influences birth weight or other adverse outcomes is essential in protecting child health. OBJECTIVE: We illustrate a novel exposure continuum mapping (ECM) framework that combines the self-organizing map (SOM) algorithm with generalized additive modeling (GAM) in order to integrate spatially-correlated learning into the study mixtures of environmental chemicals. We demonstrate our method using biomarker data on chemical mixtures collected from a diverse mother-child cohort. METHODS: We obtained biomarker concentrations for 16 prevalent endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) collected in the first-trimester from a large, ethnically/racially diverse cohort of healthy pregnant women (n = 604) during 2009-2012. This included 4 organochlorine pesticides (OCPs), 4 polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), 4 polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and 4 perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). We applied a two-stage exposure continuum mapping (ECM) approach to investigate the combined impact of the EDCs on birth weight. First, we analyzed our EDC data with SOM in order to reduce the dimensionality of our exposure matrix into a two-dimensional grid (i.e., map) where nodes depict the types of EDC mixture profiles observed within our data. We define this map as the 'exposure continuum map', as the gridded surface reflects a continuous sequence of exposure profiles where adjacent nodes are composed of similar mixtures and profiles at more distal nodes are more distinct. Lastly, we used GAM to estimate a joint-dose response based on the coordinates of our ECM in order to capture the relationship between participant location on the ECM and infant birth weight after adjusting for maternal age, race/ethnicity, pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), education, serum cotinine, total plasma lipids, and infant sex. Single chemical regression models were applied to facilitate comparison. RESULTS: We found that an ECM with 36 mixture profiles retained 70% of the total variation in the exposure data. Frequency analysis showed that the most common profiles included relatively low concentrations for most EDCs (~10%) and that profiles with relatively higher concentrations (for single or multiple EDCs) tended to be rarer (~1%) but more distinct. Estimation of a joint-dose response function revealed that lower birth weights mapped to locations where profile compositions were dominated by relatively high PBDEs and select OCPs. Higher birth weights mapped to locations where profiles consisted of higher PCBs. These findings agreed well with results from single chemical models. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from our study revealed a wide range of prenatal exposure scenarios and found that combinations exhibiting higher levels of PBDEs were associated with lower birth weight and combinations with higher levels of PCBs and PFAS were associated with increased birth weight. Our ECM approach provides a promising framework for supporting studies of other exposure mixtures.
BACKGROUND: Improved understanding of how prenatal exposure to environmental mixtures influences birth weight or other adverse outcomes is essential in protecting child health. OBJECTIVE: We illustrate a novel exposure continuum mapping (ECM) framework that combines the self-organizing map (SOM) algorithm with generalized additive modeling (GAM) in order to integrate spatially-correlated learning into the study mixtures of environmental chemicals. We demonstrate our method using biomarker data on chemical mixtures collected from a diverse mother-child cohort. METHODS: We obtained biomarker concentrations for 16 prevalent endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) collected in the first-trimester from a large, ethnically/racially diverse cohort of healthy pregnant women (n = 604) during 2009-2012. This included 4 organochlorine pesticides (OCPs), 4 polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), 4 polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and 4 perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). We applied a two-stage exposure continuum mapping (ECM) approach to investigate the combined impact of the EDCs on birth weight. First, we analyzed our EDC data with SOM in order to reduce the dimensionality of our exposure matrix into a two-dimensional grid (i.e., map) where nodes depict the types of EDC mixture profiles observed within our data. We define this map as the 'exposure continuum map', as the gridded surface reflects a continuous sequence of exposure profiles where adjacent nodes are composed of similar mixtures and profiles at more distal nodes are more distinct. Lastly, we used GAM to estimate a joint-dose response based on the coordinates of our ECM in order to capture the relationship between participant location on the ECM and infant birth weight after adjusting for maternal age, race/ethnicity, pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), education, serum cotinine, total plasma lipids, and infant sex. Single chemical regression models were applied to facilitate comparison. RESULTS: We found that an ECM with 36 mixture profiles retained 70% of the total variation in the exposure data. Frequency analysis showed that the most common profiles included relatively low concentrations for most EDCs (~10%) and that profiles with relatively higher concentrations (for single or multiple EDCs) tended to be rarer (~1%) but more distinct. Estimation of a joint-dose response function revealed that lower birth weights mapped to locations where profile compositions were dominated by relatively high PBDEs and select OCPs. Higher birth weights mapped to locations where profiles consisted of higher PCBs. These findings agreed well with results from single chemical models. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from our study revealed a wide range of prenatal exposure scenarios and found that combinations exhibiting higher levels of PBDEs were associated with lower birth weight and combinations with higher levels of PCBs and PFAS were associated with increased birth weight. Our ECM approach provides a promising framework for supporting studies of other exposure mixtures.
Authors: Jagteshwar Grewal; Katherine L Grantz; Cuilin Zhang; Anthony Sciscione; Deborah A Wing; William A Grobman; Roger B Newman; Ronald Wapner; Mary E D'Alton; Daniel Skupski; Michael P Nageotte; Angela C Ranzini; John Owen; Edward K Chien; Sabrina Craigo; Paul S Albert; Sungduk Kim; Mary L Hediger; Germaine M Buck Louis Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Janice M Y Hu; Tye E Arbuckle; Patricia Janssen; Bruce P Lanphear; Liheng H Zhuang; Joseph M Braun; Aimin Chen; Lawrence C McCandless Journal: Environ Res Date: 2021-01-17 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Ake Bergman; Jerrold J Heindel; Tim Kasten; Karen A Kidd; Susan Jobling; Maria Neira; R Thomas Zoeller; Georg Becher; Poul Bjerregaard; Riana Bornman; Ingvar Brandt; Andreas Kortenkamp; Derek Muir; Marie-Noël Brune Drisse; Roseline Ochieng; Niels E Skakkebaek; Agneta Sundén Byléhn; Taisen Iguchi; Jorma Toppari; Tracey J Woodruff Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Enrique F Schisterman; Brian W Whitcomb; Germaine M Buck Louis; Thomas A Louis Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Virissa Lenters; Lützen Portengen; Anna Rignell-Hydbom; Bo A G Jönsson; Christian H Lindh; Aldert H Piersma; Gunnar Toft; Jens Peter Bonde; Dick Heederik; Lars Rylander; Roel Vermeulen Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2015-06-26 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Pierre Gaudriault; Séverine Mazaud-Guittot; Vincent Lavoué; Isabelle Coiffec; Laurianne Lesné; Nathalie Dejucq-Rainsford; Martin Scholze; Andreas Kortenkamp; Bernard Jégou Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2017-08-04 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Yasmine K Serme-Gbedo; Nadia Abdelouahab; Jean-Charles Pasquier; Alan A Cohen; Larissa Takser Journal: Environ Health Date: 2016-04-12 Impact factor: 5.984
Authors: Vishal Singh; Javier Cortes-Ramirez; Leisa-Maree Toms; Thilakshika Sooriyagoda; Shamshad Karatela Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-25 Impact factor: 4.614