Literature DB >> 27217106

Does inhibitory control training transfer?: behavioral and neural effects on an untrained emotion regulation task.

Kathryn G Beauchamp1, Lauren E Kahn2, Elliot T Berkman2.   

Abstract

Inhibitory control (IC) is a critical neurocognitive skill for successfully navigating challenges across domains. Several studies have attempted to use training to improve neurocognitive skills such as IC, but few have found that training generalizes to performance on non-trained tasks. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate the effect of IC training on a related but untrained emotion regulation (ER) task with the goal of clarifying how training alters brain function and why its effects typically do not transfer across tasks. We suggest hypotheses for training-related changes in activation relevant to transfer effects: the strength model and several plausible alternatives (shifting priorities, stimulus-response automaticity, scaffolding). Sixty participants completed three weeks of IC training and underwent fMRI scanning before and after. The training produced pre- to post-training changes in neural activation during the ER task in the absence of behavioral changes. Specifically, individuals in the training group demonstrated reduced activation during ER in the left inferior frontal gyrus and supramarginal gyrus, key regions in the IC neural network. This result is less consistent with the strength model and more consistent with a motivational account. Implications for future work aiming to further pinpoint mechanisms of training transfer are discussed.
© The Author (2016). Published by Oxford University Press. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cognitive training; emotion regulation; functional neuroimaging; inhibitory control; strength (resource) model; training transfer

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27217106      PMCID: PMC5015810          DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsw061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci        ISSN: 1749-5016            Impact factor:   3.436


  42 in total

1.  Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans.

Authors:  Adam R Aron; Paul C Fletcher; Ed T Bullmore; Barbara J Sahakian; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Overlapping neural substrates between intentional and incidental down-regulation of negative emotions.

Authors:  Doris E Payer; Kate Baicy; Matthew D Lieberman; Edythe D London
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2012-04

Review 3.  The role of default network deactivation in cognition and disease.

Authors:  Alan Anticevic; Michael W Cole; John D Murray; Philip R Corlett; Xiao-Jing Wang; John H Krystal
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Anticipatory brain activity predicts the success or failure of subsequent emotion regulation.

Authors:  Bryan T Denny; Kevin N Ochsner; Jochen Weber; Tor D Wager
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 5.  Why self-control seems (but may not be) limited.

Authors:  Michael Inzlicht; Brandon J Schmeichel; C Neil Macrae
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual mechanisms framework.

Authors:  Todd S Braver
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Training-induced changes in inhibitory control network activity.

Authors:  Elliot T Berkman; Lauren E Kahn; Junaid S Merchant
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Common prefrontal regions activate during self-control of craving, emotion, and motor impulses in smokers.

Authors:  Golnaz Tabibnia; J David Creswell; Thomas Kraynak; Cecilia Westbrook; Erica Julson; Hilary A Tindle
Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-09

9.  The effects of lateralized frontal lesions on mood regulation.

Authors:  J Grafman; S C Vance; H Weingartner; A M Salazar; D Amin
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Fictitious inhibitory differences: how skewness and slowing distort the estimation of stopping latencies.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Christopher D Chambers; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-02-11
View more
  11 in total

1.  Brief, computerized inhibitory control training to leverage adolescent neural plasticity: A pilot effectiveness trial.

Authors:  Kathryn G Beauchamp; Kelsey A Shaffer; Philip A Fisher; Elliot T Berkman
Journal:  Appl Neuropsychol Child       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 1.493

2.  From Surviving to Thriving in the Face of Threats: The Emerging Science of Emotion Regulation Training.

Authors:  Noga Cohen; Kevin N Ochsner
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2018-10-12

3.  Cognitive control training for emotion-related impulsivity.

Authors:  Andrew D Peckham; Sheri L Johnson
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2018-03-27

4.  Executive control under stress: Relation to reappraisal ability and depressive symptoms.

Authors:  Meghan E Quinn; Jutta Joormann
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2020-04-28

5.  Associations Between Behavioral and Neural Correlates of Inhibitory Control and Amphetamine Reward Sensitivity.

Authors:  Jessica Weafer; Stephanie M Gorka; Donald Hedeker; Mario Dzemidzic; David A Kareken; K Luan Phan; Harriet de Wit
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 6.  Training Willpower: Reducing Costs and Valuing Effort.

Authors:  Michel Audiffren; Nathalie André; Roy F Baumeister
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 5.152

7.  The Neuroscience of Goals and Behavior Change.

Authors:  Elliot T Berkman
Journal:  Consult Psychol J       Date:  2018-03

8.  Training on Working Memory and Inhibitory Control in Young Adults.

Authors:  Maria J Maraver; M Teresa Bajo; Carlos J Gomez-Ariza
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Prefrontal Cortex Activity Is Associated with Biobehavioral Components of the Stress Response.

Authors:  Muriah D Wheelock; Nathaniel G Harnett; Kimberly H Wood; Tyler R Orem; Douglas A Granger; Sylvie Mrug; David C Knight
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Inhibitory control training reveals a common neurofunctional basis for generic executive functions and language switching in bilinguals.

Authors:  Yan Jing Wu; Mo Chen; Guillaume Thierry; Yongben Fu; Junjie Wu; Taomei Guo
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.