Literature DB >> 22985878

Comparative in vitro and in vivo efficacies of human simulated doses of ceftazidime and ceftazidime-avibactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Jared L Crandon1, Virna J Schuck, Mary Anne Banevicius, Marie-Eve Beaudoin, Wright W Nichols, M Angela Tanudra, David P Nicolau.   

Abstract

The combination of ceftazidime and avibactam possesses potent activity against resistant Gram-negative pathogens, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa. We compared the efficacies of human simulated doses of ceftazidime and ceftazidime-avibactam using a hollow-fiber system and neutropenic and immunocompetent murine thigh infection models. Twenty-seven clinical P. aeruginosa isolates with ceftazidime MICs of 8 to 128 mg/liter and ceftazidime-avibactam MICs of 4 to 32 mg/liter were utilized in neutropenic mouse studies; 15 of the isolates were also evaluated in immunocompetent mice. Six isolates were studied in both the hollow-fiber system and the neutropenic mouse. In both systems, the free drug concentration-time profile seen in humans given 2 g of ceftazidime every 8 h (2-h infusion), with or without avibactam at 500 mg every 8 h (2-h infusion), was evaluated. In vivo activity was pharmacodynamically predictable based on the MIC. Ceftazidime decreased bacterial densities by ≥0.5 log unit for 10/27 isolates, while ceftazidime-avibactam did so for 22/27 isolates. In immunocompetent animals, enhancements in activity were seen for both drugs, with ceftazidime achieving reductions of ≥0.3 log unit for 10/15 isolates, whereas ceftazidime-avibactam did so against all 15 isolates. In vitro, ceftazidime resulted in regrowth by 24 h against all isolates, while ceftazidime-avibactam achieved stasis or better against 4/7 isolates. Mutants with elevated ceftazidime-avibactam MICs appeared after 24 h from 3/7 isolates studied in vitro; however, no resistant mutants were detected in vivo. Against this highly ceftazidime-nonsusceptible population of P. aeruginosa, treatment with human simulated doses of ceftazidime-avibactam resulted in pharmacodynamically predictable activity, particularly in vivo, against isolates with MICs of ≤16 mg/liter, and this represents a potential new option to combat these difficult-to-treat pathogens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22985878      PMCID: PMC3497209          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00851-12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  25 in total

1.  Mechanistic studies of the inactivation of TEM-1 and P99 by NXL104, a novel non-beta-lactam beta-lactamase inhibitor.

Authors:  Thérèse Stachyra; Marie-Claude Péchereau; Jean-Michel Bruneau; Monique Claudon; Jean-Marie Frère; Christine Miossec; Kenneth Coleman; Michael T Black
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  In vitro activity of ceftazidime combined with NXL104 versus Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates obtained from patients in Canadian hospitals (CANWARD 2009 study).

Authors:  A Walkty; M DeCorby; P R S Lagacé-Wiens; J A Karlowsky; D J Hoban; G G Zhanel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Two compartment kinetic model with multiple artificial capillary units.

Authors:  J Blaser; B B Stone; S H Zinner
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  Comparative study with enoxacin and netilmicin in a pharmacodynamic model to determine importance of ratio of antibiotic peak concentration to MIC for bactericidal activity and emergence of resistance.

Authors:  J Blaser; B B Stone; M C Groner; S H Zinner
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Use of preclinical data for selection of a phase II/III dose for evernimicin and identification of a preclinical MIC breakpoint.

Authors:  G L Drusano; S L Preston; C Hardalo; R Hare; C Banfield; D Andes; O Vesga; W A Craig
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  In vitro activity of ceftazidime+NXL104 against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other non-fermenters.

Authors:  Shazad Mushtaq; Marina Warner; David M Livermore
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  Resistance development profiling of piperacillin in combination with the novel {beta}-lactamase inhibitor BLI-489.

Authors:  Alexey Ruzin; Peter J Petersen; C Hal Jones
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  In vivo pharmacodynamic profiling of doripenem against Pseudomonas aeruginosa by simulating human exposures.

Authors:  Aryun Kim; Mary Anne Banevicius; David P Nicolau
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-05-05       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Pharmacodynamics of cidofovir for vaccinia virus infection in an in vitro hollow-fiber infection model system.

Authors:  James J McSharry; Mark R Deziel; Kris Zager; Qingmei Weng; George L Drusano
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-10-13       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Effect of 2',3'-didehydro-3'-deoxythymidine in an in vitro hollow-fiber pharmacodynamic model system correlates with results of dose-ranging clinical studies.

Authors:  J A Bilello; G Bauer; M N Dudley; G A Cole; G L Drusano
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  47 in total

Review 1.  Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections: The Old Antimicrobials and the New Players.

Authors:  Young R Lee; Danni McMahan; Catherine McCall; Gregory K Perry
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Activities of ceftazidime and avibactam against β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in a hollow-fiber pharmacodynamic model.

Authors:  Ken Coleman; Premavathy Levasseur; Anne-Marie Girard; Monica Borgonovi; Christine Miossec; Henri Merdjan; George Drusano; David Shlaes; Wright W Nichols
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Pharmacodynamics of Cefepime Combined with Tazobactam against Clinically Relevant Enterobacteriaceae in a Neutropenic Mouse Thigh Model.

Authors:  Maria J Melchers; Anita C van Mil; Claudia Lagarde; Jan den Hartigh; Johan W Mouton
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Pharmacokinetics and penetration of ceftazidime and avibactam into epithelial lining fluid in thigh- and lung-infected mice.

Authors:  Johanna Berkhout; Maria J Melchers; Anita C van Mil; Seyedmojtaba Seyedmousavi; Claudia M Lagarde; Wright W Nichols; Johan W Mouton
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Bactericidal activity, absence of serum effect, and time-kill kinetics of ceftazidime-avibactam against β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Tiffany R Keepers; Marcela Gomez; Chris Celeri; Wright W Nichols; Kevin M Krause
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Human simulated studies of aztreonam and aztreonam-avibactam to evaluate activity against challenging gram-negative organisms, including metallo-β-lactamase producers.

Authors:  Jared L Crandon; David P Nicolau
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  What Antibiotic Exposures Are Required to Suppress the Emergence of Resistance for Gram-Negative Bacteria? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Chandra Datta Sumi; Aaron J Heffernan; Jeffrey Lipman; Jason A Roberts; Fekade B Sime
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Safety and pharmacokinetics of single and multiple ascending doses of avibactam alone and in combination with ceftazidime in healthy male volunteers: results of two randomized, placebo-controlled studies.

Authors:  Henri Merdjan; Manickam Rangaraju; Antoine Tarral
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.859

9.  Impact of MIC range for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Streptococcus pneumoniae on the ceftolozane in vivo pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target.

Authors:  A J Lepak; A Reda; K Marchillo; J Van Hecker; W A Craig; D Andes
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  The β-Lactams Strike Back: Ceftazidime-Avibactam.

Authors:  Evan J Zasowski; Jeffrey M Rybak; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.705

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.