Literature DB >> 27215570

Patients with cancer and change of general practice: a Danish population-based cohort study.

Kasper Grooss1, Peter Hjertholm1, Anders H Carlsen1, Peter Vedsted1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: General practice plays an important role in the cancer care pathway. Patient dissatisfaction with the diagnostic process may be expressed by changing to another general practice. AIM: To compare the frequency of change of practice (COP) in patients with cancer (n = 150 216) with a matched cancer-free control cohort (n = 1 502 114) and to analyse associations with cancer type and patient characteristics. DESIGN AND
SETTING: A population-based matched cohort study using historical and prospectively collected data from Danish nationwide registers.
METHOD: COP was defined as a change of practice list, unrelated to change of address or reorganisation of the practice. Data were analysed monthly in the year before and after a cancer diagnosis.
RESULTS: More patients with cancer than controls changed general practice (4.1% versus 2.6%) from 7 months before and until 12 months after diagnosis. The COP rate varied by cancer type (rectal cancer served as reference). Before the diagnosis, COP was most often seen among patients with ovarian cancer (risk ratio [RR] 1.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.10 to 2.08) and multiple myeloma (RR 1.89, 95% CI = 1.34 to 2.67). After the diagnosis, COP was most frequent among patients with brain cancer (RR 1.38, 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.82) and ovarian cancer (RR 1.51, 95% CI = 1.21 to 1.88).
CONCLUSION: Patients with cancer changed general practice more frequently than the cancer-free controls. COP variations between cancer types may be attributed to lack of diagnostic timeliness due to clinical complexity of the diagnosis and the role of the GP in the diagnostic process. © British Journal of General Practice 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Denmark; continuity of patient care; early detection of cancer; general practice; neoplasms; primary health care

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27215570      PMCID: PMC4917052          DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X685633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  27 in total

1.  General practice and primary health care in Denmark.

Authors:  Kjeld Møller Pedersen; John Sahl Andersen; Jens Søndergaard
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.657

2.  Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries.

Authors:  Hude Quan; Bing Li; Chantal M Couris; Kiyohide Fushimi; Patrick Graham; Phil Hider; Jean-Marie Januel; Vijaya Sundararajan
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  The Danish Pathology Register.

Authors:  Beth Bjerregaard; Ole B Larsen
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.021

4.  Beyond the examination room: primary care performance and the patient-physician relationship for low-income women.

Authors:  Ann S O'Malley; Christopher B Forrest
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Agreement between patients and general practitioners on quality deviations during the cancer diagnostic pathway and associations with time to diagnosis.

Authors:  Henry Jensen; Cecilie Sperling; Mette Sandager; Peter Vedsted
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 2.267

6.  Time intervals from first symptom to treatment of cancer: a cohort study of 2,212 newly diagnosed cancer patients.

Authors:  Rikke P Hansen; Peter Vedsted; Ineta Sokolowski; Jens Søndergaard; Frede Olesen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  The Danish Civil Registration System.

Authors:  Carsten Bøcker Pedersen
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.021

8.  Five misconceptions in cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  William Hamilton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  The predictive value of ICD-10 diagnostic coding used to assess Charlson comorbidity index conditions in the population-based Danish National Registry of Patients.

Authors:  Sandra K Thygesen; Christian F Christiansen; Steffen Christensen; Timothy L Lash; Henrik T Sørensen
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-05-28       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Risk factors for delayed presentation and referral of symptomatic cancer: evidence for common cancers.

Authors:  U Macleod; E D Mitchell; C Burgess; S Macdonald; A J Ramirez
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  3 in total

1.  Interventions to reduce the time to diagnosis of brain tumours.

Authors:  Robin Grant; Therese Dowswell; Eve Tomlinson; Paul M Brennan; Fiona M Walter; Yoav Ben-Shlomo; David William Hunt; Helen Bulbeck; Ashleigh Kernohan; Tomos Robinson; Theresa A Lawrie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-09-04

2.  The diagnostic pathway of Parkinson's disease: a cross-sectional survey study of factors influencing patient dissatisfaction.

Authors:  Annette O A Plouvier; Tim C Olde Hartman; Olga A de Bont; Sjoerd Maandag; Bastiaan R Bloem; Chris van Weel; Antoine L M Lagro-Janssen
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 2.497

3.  Mental well-being and job satisfaction in general practitioners in Denmark and their patients' change of general practitioner: a cohort study combining survey data and register data.

Authors:  Karen Busk Nørøxe; Peter Vedsted; Flemming Bro; Anders Helles Carlsen; Anette Fischer Pedersen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.