Literature DB >> 27213913

Adaptive contrast weighted learning for multi-stage multi-treatment decision-making.

Yebin Tao1, Lu Wang1.   

Abstract

Dynamic treatment regimes (DTRs) are sequential decision rules that focus simultaneously on treatment individualization and adaptation over time. To directly identify the optimal DTR in a multi-stage multi-treatment setting, we propose a dynamic statistical learning method, adaptive contrast weighted learning. We develop semiparametric regression-based contrasts with the adaptation of treatment effect ordering for each patient at each stage, and the adaptive contrasts simplify the problem of optimization with multiple treatment comparisons to a weighted classification problem that can be solved by existing machine learning techniques. The algorithm is implemented recursively using backward induction. By combining doubly robust semiparametric regression estimators with machine learning algorithms, the proposed method is robust and efficient for the identification of the optimal DTR, as shown in the simulation studies. We illustrate our method using observational data on esophageal cancer.
© 2016, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Backward induction; Causal inference; Classification; Dynamic treatment regime; Personalized medicine

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27213913     DOI: 10.1111/biom.12539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  11 in total

1.  A general statistical framework for subgroup identification and comparative treatment scoring.

Authors:  Shuai Chen; Lu Tian; Tianxi Cai; Menggang Yu
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Quantile-Optimal Treatment Regimes.

Authors:  Lan Wang; Yu Zhou; Rui Song; Ben Sherwood
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 5.033

3.  Step-adjusted tree-based reinforcement learning for evaluating nested dynamic treatment regimes using test-and-treat observational data.

Authors:  Ming Tang; Lu Wang; Michael A Gorin; Jeremy M G Taylor
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  A parsimonious personalized dose-finding model via dimension reduction.

Authors:  Wenzhuo Zhou; Ruoqing Zhu; Donglin Zeng
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 3.028

5.  Self-matched learning to construct treatment decision rules from electronic health records.

Authors:  Tianchen Xu; Yuan Chen; Donglin Zeng; Yuanjia Wang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 2.497

6.  Optimal two-stage dynamic treatment regimes from a classification perspective with censored survival data.

Authors:  Rebecca Hager; Anastasios A Tsiatis; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Multi-Armed Angle-Based Direct Learning for Estimating Optimal Individualized Treatment Rules With Various Outcomes.

Authors:  Zhengling Qi; Dacheng Liu; Haoda Fu; Yufeng Liu
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 5.033

8.  Estimating the optimal individualized treatment rule from a cost-effectiveness perspective.

Authors:  Yizhe Xu; Tom H Greene; Adam P Bress; Brian C Sauer; Brandon K Bellows; Yue Zhang; William S Weintraub; Andrew E Moran; Jincheng Shen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Optimal dynamic treatment regime estimation using information extraction from unstructured clinical text.

Authors:  Nina Zhou; Robert D Brook; Ivo D Dinov; Lu Wang
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 1.715

10.  Optimal individualized decision rules from a multi-arm trial: A comparison of methods and an application to tailoring inter-donation intervals among blood donors in the UK.

Authors:  Yuejia Xu; Angela M Wood; Michael J Sweeting; David J Roberts; Brian Dm Tom
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 3.021

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.