Literature DB >> 27213027

Assessing Built Environment Walkability using Activity-Space Summary Measures.

Calvin P Tribby1, Harvey J Miller1, Barbara B Brown2, Carol M Werner3, Ken R Smith2.   

Abstract

There is increasing emphasis on active transportation, such as walking, in transportation planning as a sustainable form of mobility and in public health as a means of achieving recommended physical activity and better health outcomes. A research focus is the influence of the built environment on walking, with the ultimate goal of identifying environmental modifications that invite more walking. However, assessments of the built environment for walkability are typically at a spatially disaggregate level (such as street blocks) or at a spatially aggregate level (such as census block groups). A key issue is determining the spatial units for walkability measures so that they reflect potential walking behavior. This paper develops methods for assessing walkability within individual activity spaces: the geographic region accessible to an individual during a given walking trip. We first estimate street network-based activity spaces using the shortest path between known trip starting/ending points and a travel time budget that reflects potential alternative paths. Based on objective walkability measures of the street blocks, we use three summary measures for walkability within activity spaces: i) the average walkability score across block segments (representing the general level of walkability in the activity space); ii) the standard deviation (representing the walkability variation), and; iii) the network autocorrelation (representing the spatial coherence of the walkability pattern). We assess the method using data from an empirical study of built environment walkability and walking behavior in Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. We visualize and map these activity space summary measures to compare walkability among individuals' trips within their neighborhoods. We also compare summary measures for activity spaces versus census block groups, with the result that they agree less than half of the time.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27213027      PMCID: PMC4874199          DOI: 10.5198/jtlu.2015.625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Transp Land Use        ISSN: 1938-7849


  19 in total

1.  Mapping residents' perceptions of neighborhood boundaries: a methodological note.

Authors:  C J Coulton; J Korbin; T Chan; M Su
Journal:  Am J Community Psychol       Date:  2001-04

Review 2.  Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures.

Authors:  Brian E Saelens; James F Sallis; Lawrence D Frank
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2003

Review 3.  Walking and bicycling: an evaluation of environmental audit instruments.

Authors:  Anne Vernez Moudon; Chanam Lee
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct

4.  Relationships of land use mix with walking for transport: do land uses and geographical scale matter?

Authors:  Mitch J Duncan; Elisabeth Winkler; Takemi Sugiyama; Ester Cerin; Lorinne duToit; Eva Leslie; Neville Owen
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.671

5.  Built environment and behavior: spatial sampling using parcel data.

Authors:  Chanam Lee; Anne Vernez Moudon; Jean-Yves Pip Courbois
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 3.797

6.  Destinations that matter: associations with walking for transport.

Authors:  Ester Cerin; Eva Leslie; Lorinne du Toit; Neville Owen; Lawrence D Frank
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 4.078

7.  Mismatch between perceived and objectively assessed neighborhood walkability attributes: prospective relationships with walking and weight gain.

Authors:  Klaus Gebel; Adrian E Bauman; Takemi Sugiyama; Neville Owen
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 4.078

8.  Neighborhood design for walking and biking: physical activity and body mass index.

Authors:  Barbara B Brown; Ken R Smith; Heidi Hanson; Jessie X Fan; Lori Kowaleski-Jones; Cathleen D Zick
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Association of the built environment with physical activity and obesity in older persons.

Authors:  Ethan M Berke; Thomas D Koepsell; Anne Vernez Moudon; Richard E Hoskins; Eric B Larson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Creating and validating GIS measures of urban design for health research.

Authors:  Marnie Purciel; Kathryn M Neckerman; Gina S Lovasi; James W Quinn; Christopher Weiss; Michael D M Bader; Reid Ewing; Andrew Rundle
Journal:  J Environ Psychol       Date:  2009-12-01
View more
  8 in total

1.  Analyzing Walking Route Choice through Built Environments using Random Forests and Discrete Choice Techniques.

Authors:  Calvin P Tribby; Harvey J Miller; Barbara B Brown; Carol M Werner; Ken R Smith
Journal:  Environ Plan B Urban Anal City Sci       Date:  2016-07-20

Review 2.  "Contextualizing Context": Reconciling Environmental Exposures, Social Networks, and Location Preferences in Health Research.

Authors:  Yan Kestens; Rania Wasfi; Alexandre Naud; Basile Chaix
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2017-03

3.  Geographic regions for assessing built environmental correlates with walking trips: A comparison using different metrics and model designs.

Authors:  Calvin P Tribby; Harvey J Miller; Barbara B Brown; Ken R Smith; Carol M Werner
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 4.078

4.  Quantification of Free-Living Community Mobility in Healthy Older Adults Using Wearable Sensors.

Authors:  Patrick Boissy; Margaux Blamoutier; Simon Brière; Christian Duval
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2018-08-13

5.  Environmental, Individual and Personal Goal Influences on Older Adults' Walking in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area.

Authors:  Tiina E Laatikainen; Mohammad Haybatollahi; Marketta Kyttä
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Cross-sectional and prospective associations between active living environments and accelerometer-assessed physical activity in the EPIC-Norfolk cohort.

Authors:  Samantha Hajna; Soren Brage; Alice Dalton; Simon J Griffin; Andy P Jones; Kay-Tee Khaw; Robert Luben; Nicholas J Wareham; Jenna Panter
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2020-12-13       Impact factor: 4.078

7.  Built Environment and Childhood Weight Status: A Multi-Level Study Using Population-Based Data in the City of Hannover, Germany.

Authors:  Yusheng Zhou; Christoph Buck; Werner Maier; Thomas von Lengerke; Ulla Walter; Maren Dreier
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  An Interdisciplinary Mixed-Methods Approach to Analyzing Urban Spaces: The Case of Urban Walkability and Bikeability.

Authors:  Bernd Resch; Inga Puetz; Matthias Bluemke; Kalliopi Kyriakou; Jakob Miksch
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.