Literature DB >> 20814757

Relationships of land use mix with walking for transport: do land uses and geographical scale matter?

Mitch J Duncan1, Elisabeth Winkler, Takemi Sugiyama, Ester Cerin, Lorinne duToit, Eva Leslie, Neville Owen.   

Abstract

Physical activity and public health recommendations now emphasize the creation of activity-friendly neighborhoods. Mixed land use in a neighborhood is important in this regard, as it reflects the availability of destinations to which residents can walk or ride bicycles, and thus is likely to contribute to residents' active lifestyles that in turn will influence their overall health. Relationships between land use mix (LUM) and physical activity have not been apparent in some studies, which may be because geographical scale and the specificity of hypothesized environment-behavior associations are not taken into account. We compared the strength of association of four Geographic Information Systems-derived LUM measures with walking for transport and perceived proximity to destinations. We assessed physical activity behaviors of 2,506 adults in 154 Census Collection Districts (CCDs) in Adelaide, Australia, for which ''original'' LUM measures were calculated, and then refined by either: accounting for the geographic scale of measurement; including only the most-relevant land uses; or, both. The refined (but not the ''original'') LUM measures had significant associations with the frequency of walking for transport (p < 0.05) and area-corrected measures had significant associations with the duration of walking for transport. All LUM measures had significant associations with perceived proximity to destinations, but stronger associations were seen when using the refined measures compared with the original LUM. Identifying the LUM attributes most strongly associated with walking for transport is a priority and can inform environmental and policy initiatives that are needed to promote health-enhancing physical activity.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20814757      PMCID: PMC2937129          DOI: 10.1007/s11524-010-9488-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urban Health        ISSN: 1099-3460            Impact factor:   3.671


  29 in total

1.  Socioeconomic status and perceptions of access and safety for physical activity.

Authors:  Dawn K Wilson; Karen A Kirtland; Barbara E Ainsworth; Cheryl L Addy
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2004-08

2.  Residents' perceptions of walkability attributes in objectively different neighbourhoods: a pilot study.

Authors:  Eva Leslie; Brian Saelens; Lawrence Frank; Neville Owen; Adrian Bauman; Neil Coffee; Graeme Hugo
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.078

3.  Walkability of local communities: using geographic information systems to objectively assess relevant environmental attributes.

Authors:  Eva Leslie; Neil Coffee; Lawrence Frank; Neville Owen; Adrian Bauman; Graeme Hugo
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 4.078

Review 4.  Understanding physical activity environmental correlates: increased specificity for ecological models.

Authors:  Billie Giles-Corti; Anna Timperio; Fiona Bull; Terri Pikora
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.230

5.  Destinations that matter: associations with walking for transport.

Authors:  Ester Cerin; Eva Leslie; Lorinne du Toit; Neville Owen; Lawrence D Frank
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 4.078

6.  Neighborhood walkability and the walking behavior of Australian adults.

Authors:  Neville Owen; Ester Cerin; Eva Leslie; Lorinne duToit; Neil Coffee; Lawrence D Frank; Adrian E Bauman; Graeme Hugo; Brian E Saelens; James F Sallis
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 7.  An ecological approach to creating active living communities.

Authors:  James F Sallis; Robert B Cervero; William Ascher; Karla A Henderson; M Katherine Kraft; Jacqueline Kerr
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 21.981

8.  Walking to work and the risk for hypertension in men: the Osaka Health Survey.

Authors:  T Hayashi; K Tsumura; C Suematsu; K Okada; S Fujii; G Endo
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-07-06       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 9.  Potential environmental determinants of physical activity in adults: a systematic review.

Authors:  W Wendel-Vos; M Droomers; S Kremers; J Brug; F van Lenthe
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 9.213

10.  Conceptualizing and operationalizing neighbourhoods: the conundrum of identifying territorial units.

Authors:  Lise Gauvin; Eric Robitaille; Mylène Riva; Lindsay McLaren; Clément Dassa; Louise Potvin
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug
View more
  34 in total

1.  A multilevel examination of factors of the school environment and time spent in moderate to vigorous physical activity among a sample of secondary school students in grades 9-12 in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Erin Hobin; Scott Leatherdale; Steve Manske; Joel Dubin; Susan Elliott; Paul Veugelers
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Do relationships between environmental attributes and recreational walking vary according to area-level socioeconomic status?

Authors:  Takemi Sugiyama; Natasha J Howard; Catherine Paquet; Neil T Coffee; Anne W Taylor; Mark Daniel
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.671

3.  Higher residential and employment densities are associated with more objectively measured walking in the home neighborhood.

Authors:  Ruizhu Huang; Anne V Moudon; Chuan Zhou; Brian E Saelens
Journal:  J Transp Health       Date:  2019-01-22

4.  Activity space environment and dietary and physical activity behaviors: a pilot study.

Authors:  Shannon N Zenk; Amy J Schulz; Stephen A Matthews; Angela Odoms-Young; JoEllen Wilbur; Lani Wegrzyn; Kevin Gibbs; Carol Braunschweig; Carmen Stokes
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 4.078

5.  Use of global positioning system for physical activity research in youth: ESPAÇOS Adolescentes, Brazil.

Authors:  Claudia Oliveira Alberico; Jasper Schipperijn; Rodrigo S Reis
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Secondary GIS built environment data for health research: guidance for data development.

Authors:  Orion T Stewart; Heather A Carlos; Chanam Lee; Ethan M Berke; Philip M Hurvitz; Li Li; Anne Vernez Moudon; Mark P Doescher
Journal:  J Transp Health       Date:  2016-01-22

7.  Association between the Built Environment and Active Transportation among U.S. Adolescents.

Authors:  Selam Tewahade; Kaigang Li; Risë B Goldstein; Denise Haynie; Ronald J Iannotti; Bruce Simons-Morton
Journal:  J Transp Health       Date:  2019-09-12

8.  Discrete land uses and transportation walking in two U.S. cities: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Jana A Hirsch; Ana V Diez Roux; Daniel A Rodriguez; Shannon J Brines; Kari A Moore
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 4.078

9.  Neighborhood characteristics and transport walking: Exploring multiple pathways of influence using a structural equation modeling approach.

Authors:  Jingjing Li; Amy H Auchincloss; Yong Yang; Daniel A Rodriguez; Brisa N Sánchez
Journal:  J Transp Geogr       Date:  2020-04-22

10.  Assessing Built Environment Walkability using Activity-Space Summary Measures.

Authors:  Calvin P Tribby; Harvey J Miller; Barbara B Brown; Carol M Werner; Ken R Smith
Journal:  J Transp Land Use       Date:  2016
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.