Samarthya Bhagia1, Wellington Muchero2, Rajeev Kumar3, Gerald A Tuskan2, Charles E Wyman1. 1. Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Bourns College of Engineering, University of California Riverside, 900 University Ave, Riverside, CA 92521 USA ; Center for Environmental Research and Technology, Bourns College of Engineering, University of California Riverside, 1084 Columbia Ave, Riverside, CA 92507 USA ; BioEnergy Science Center (BESC), Oak Ridge National Laboratory, PO Box 2008 MS6341, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA. 2. Biosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA ; BioEnergy Science Center (BESC), Oak Ridge National Laboratory, PO Box 2008 MS6341, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA. 3. Center for Environmental Research and Technology, Bourns College of Engineering, University of California Riverside, 1084 Columbia Ave, Riverside, CA 92507 USA ; BioEnergy Science Center (BESC), Oak Ridge National Laboratory, PO Box 2008 MS6341, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lignin content and structure are known to affect recalcitrance of lignocellulosic biomass to chemical/biochemical conversion. Previously, we identified rare Populus trichocarpa natural variants with significantly reduced lignin content. Because reduced lignin content may lower recalcitrance, 18 rare variants along with 4 comparators, and BESC standard Populus was analyzed for composition of structural carbohydrates and lignin. Sugar yields from these plants were measured at 5 process conditions: one for just enzymatic hydrolysis without pretreatment and four via our combined high-throughput hot water pretreatment and co-hydrolysis (HTPH) technique. RESULTS: Mean of glucan + xylan yields and the best glucan + xylan yield from rare natural poplar variants were 34 and 50 relative percent higher than the high lignin comparator (BESC-316) at the highest severity HTPH condition, respectively. The ability of HTPH to solubilize a large portion of xylan from solids led to small differences in xylan yields among poplar variants. However, HTPH showed large differences in glucan yields, and hence glucan + xylan yields, among the poplar variants. The high lignin comparator did not display lowest glucan + xylan yields with HTPH at moderate pretreatment severity compared to rare variants, but on the other hand, the low lignin comparator was a consistent top performer at all 5 process conditions. Furthermore, the low lignin comparator (GW-11012) showed a 15 absolute percent increase in glucan + xylan yield compared to the high lignin comparator at the most severe HTPH condition. Overall, relative variant rankings varied greatly with pretreatment severity, but poplar deconstruction was significantly enhanced when the pretreatment temperature was increased from 140 and 160 to 180 °C at the same pretreatment severity factor. CONCLUSIONS: Glucan yields from high severity HTPH of rare natural poplar variants with reduced lignin content were significantly higher than from the high lignin comparator. Because of the significant effect of processing conditions on the performance rankings, selection of the best performing biofuel feedstocks should be based on sugar yields tested at conditions that represent industrial practice. From a feedstock perspective, the most consistent variants, SKWE-24-2 and GW-11012, provide key insights into the genetic improvement of versatile lignocellulosic biofuels feedstock varieties.
BACKGROUND:Lignin content and structure are known to affect recalcitrance of lignocellulosic biomass to chemical/biochemical conversion. Previously, we identified rare Populus trichocarpa natural variants with significantly reduced lignin content. Because reduced lignin content may lower recalcitrance, 18 rare variants along with 4 comparators, and BESC standard Populus was analyzed for composition of structural carbohydrates and lignin. Sugar yields from these plants were measured at 5 process conditions: one for just enzymatic hydrolysis without pretreatment and four via our combined high-throughput hot water pretreatment and co-hydrolysis (HTPH) technique. RESULTS: Mean of glucan + xylan yields and the best glucan + xylan yield from rare natural poplar variants were 34 and 50 relative percent higher than the high lignin comparator (BESC-316) at the highest severity HTPH condition, respectively. The ability of HTPH to solubilize a large portion of xylan from solids led to small differences in xylan yields among poplar variants. However, HTPH showed large differences in glucan yields, and hence glucan + xylan yields, among the poplar variants. The high lignin comparator did not display lowest glucan + xylan yields with HTPH at moderate pretreatment severity compared to rare variants, but on the other hand, the low lignin comparator was a consistent top performer at all 5 process conditions. Furthermore, the low lignin comparator (GW-11012) showed a 15 absolute percent increase in glucan + xylan yield compared to the high lignin comparator at the most severe HTPH condition. Overall, relative variant rankings varied greatly with pretreatment severity, but poplar deconstruction was significantly enhanced when the pretreatment temperature was increased from 140 and 160 to 180 °C at the same pretreatment severity factor. CONCLUSIONS:Glucan yields from high severity HTPH of rare natural poplar variants with reduced lignin content were significantly higher than from the high lignin comparator. Because of the significant effect of processing conditions on the performance rankings, selection of the best performing biofuel feedstocks should be based on sugar yields tested at conditions that represent industrial practice. From a feedstock perspective, the most consistent variants, SKWE-24-2 and GW-11012, provide key insights into the genetic improvement of versatile lignocellulosic biofuels feedstock varieties.
Entities:
Keywords:
High-throughput pretreatment and co-hydrolysis; Lignin comparators; Liquid hot water pretreatment; Poplar ranks; Rare poplar variants
Authors: Michael H Studer; Jaclyn D DeMartini; Simone Brethauer; Heather L McKenzie; Charles E Wyman Journal: Biotechnol Bioeng Date: 2010-02-01 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Michael H Studer; Jaclyn D DeMartini; Mark F Davis; Robert W Sykes; Brian Davison; Martin Keller; Gerald A Tuskan; Charles E Wyman Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-03-28 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: P K Smith; R I Krohn; G T Hermanson; A K Mallia; F H Gartner; M D Provenzano; E K Fujimoto; N M Goeke; B J Olson; D C Klenk Journal: Anal Biochem Date: 1985-10 Impact factor: 3.365
Authors: Michael J Selig; Sridhar Viamajala; Stephen R Decker; Melvin P Tucker; Michael E Himmel; Todd B Vinzant Journal: Biotechnol Prog Date: 2007-10-31
Authors: Jeffrey V Zurawski; Piyum A Khatibi; Hannah O Akinosho; Christopher T Straub; Scott H Compton; Jonathan M Conway; Laura L Lee; Arthur J Ragauskas; Brian H Davison; Michael W W Adams; Robert M Kelly Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2017-08-17 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Jonathan M Conway; Bennett S McKinley; Nathaniel L Seals; Diana Hernandez; Piyum A Khatibi; Suresh Poudel; Richard J Giannone; Robert L Hettich; Amanda M Williams-Rhaesa; Gina L Lipscomb; Michael W W Adams; Robert M Kelly Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Jack P Wang; Megan L Matthews; Cranos M Williams; Rui Shi; Chenmin Yang; Sermsawat Tunlaya-Anukit; Hsi-Chuan Chen; Quanzi Li; Jie Liu; Chien-Yuan Lin; Punith Naik; Ying-Hsuan Sun; Philip L Loziuk; Ting-Feng Yeh; Hoon Kim; Erica Gjersing; Todd Shollenberger; Christopher M Shuford; Jina Song; Zachary Miller; Yung-Yun Huang; Charles W Edmunds; Baoguang Liu; Yi Sun; Ying-Chung Jimmy Lin; Wei Li; Hao Chen; Ilona Peszlen; Joel J Ducoste; John Ralph; Hou-Min Chang; David C Muddiman; Mark F Davis; Chris Smith; Fikret Isik; Ronald Sederoff; Vincent L Chiang Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2018-04-20 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Evert K Holwerda; Robert S Worthen; Ninad Kothari; Ronald C Lasky; Brian H Davison; Chunxiang Fu; Zeng-Yu Wang; Richard A Dixon; Ajaya K Biswal; Debra Mohnen; Richard S Nelson; Holly L Baxter; Mitra Mazarei; C Neal Stewart; Wellington Muchero; Gerald A Tuskan; Charles M Cai; Erica E Gjersing; Mark F Davis; Michael E Himmel; Charles E Wyman; Paul Gilna; Lee R Lynd Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels Date: 2019-01-17 Impact factor: 6.040
Authors: Samarthya Bhagia; Xianzhi Meng; Barbara R Evans; John R Dunlap; Garima Bali; Jihua Chen; Kimberly Shawn Reeves; Hoi Chun Ho; Brian H Davison; Yunqiao Pu; Arthur J Ragauskas Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-09-05 Impact factor: 4.379