Literature DB >> 27212236

Coexisting Liquid Phases Underlie Nucleolar Subcompartments.

Marina Feric1, Nilesh Vaidya1, Tyler S Harmon2, Diana M Mitrea3, Lian Zhu1, Tiffany M Richardson1, Richard W Kriwacki3, Rohit V Pappu4, Clifford P Brangwynne5.   

Abstract

The nucleolus and other ribonucleoprotein (RNP) bodies are membrane-less organelles that appear to assemble through phase separation of their molecular components. However, many such RNP bodies contain internal subcompartments, and the mechanism of their formation remains unclear. Here, we combine in vivo and in vitro studies, together with computational modeling, to show that subcompartments within the nucleolus represent distinct, coexisting liquid phases. Consistent with their in vivo immiscibility, purified nucleolar proteins phase separate into droplets containing distinct non-coalescing phases that are remarkably similar to nucleoli in vivo. This layered droplet organization is caused by differences in the biophysical properties of the phases-particularly droplet surface tension-which arises from sequence-encoded features of their macromolecular components. These results suggest that phase separation can give rise to multilayered liquids that may facilitate sequential RNA processing reactions in a variety of RNP bodies. PAPERCLIP.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27212236      PMCID: PMC5127388          DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell        ISSN: 0092-8674            Impact factor:   41.582


  42 in total

Review 1.  Getting RNA and protein in phase.

Authors:  Stephanie C Weber; Clifford P Brangwynne
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  Birth of a nucleolus: the evolution of nucleolar compartments.

Authors:  Marc Thiry; Denis L J Lafontaine
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 20.808

3.  Inverse size scaling of the nucleolus by a concentration-dependent phase transition.

Authors:  Stephanie C Weber; Clifford P Brangwynne
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 4.  Eukaryotic stress granules: the ins and outs of translation.

Authors:  J Ross Buchan; Roy Parker
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2009-12-25       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  Nuclear domains.

Authors:  D L Spector
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.285

6.  Phase transitions in the assembly of multivalent signalling proteins.

Authors:  Pilong Li; Sudeep Banjade; Hui-Chun Cheng; Soyeon Kim; Baoyu Chen; Liang Guo; Marc Llaguno; Javoris V Hollingsworth; David S King; Salman F Banani; Paul S Russo; Qiu-Xing Jiang; B Tracy Nixon; Michael K Rosen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Stress granules and processing bodies are dynamically linked sites of mRNP remodeling.

Authors:  Nancy Kedersha; Georg Stoecklin; Maranatha Ayodele; Patrick Yacono; Jens Lykke-Andersen; Marvin J Fritzler; Donalyn Scheuner; Randal J Kaufman; David E Golan; Paul Anderson
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2005-06-20       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  A nuclear F-actin scaffold stabilizes ribonucleoprotein droplets against gravity in large cells.

Authors:  Marina Feric; Clifford P Brangwynne
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 28.824

9.  A cluster of methylations in the domain IV of 25S rRNA is required for ribosome stability.

Authors:  Andriana Gigova; Sujitha Duggimpudi; Tim Pollex; Matthias Schaefer; Martin Koš
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 4.942

10.  Prion-like domains in RNA binding proteins are essential for building subnuclear paraspeckles.

Authors:  Sven Hennig; Geraldine Kong; Taro Mannen; Agata Sadowska; Simon Kobelke; Amanda Blythe; Gavin J Knott; K Swaminathan Iyer; Diwei Ho; Estella A Newcombe; Kana Hosoki; Naoki Goshima; Tetsuya Kawaguchi; Danny Hatters; Laura Trinkle-Mulcahy; Tetsuro Hirose; Charles S Bond; Archa H Fox
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  489 in total

1.  Nuclear condensates of the Polycomb protein chromobox 2 (CBX2) assemble through phase separation.

Authors:  Roubina Tatavosian; Samantha Kent; Kyle Brown; Tingting Yao; Huy Nguyen Duc; Thao Ngoc Huynh; Chao Yu Zhen; Brian Ma; Haobin Wang; Xiaojun Ren
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Organizing the oocyte: RNA localization meets phase separation.

Authors:  Sarah E Cabral; Kimberly L Mowry
Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Determination of Aqueous Two-Phase System Binodals and Tie-Lines by Electrowetting-on-Dielectric Droplet Manipulation.

Authors:  Taisuke Kojima; Chu-Chi Lin; Shuichi Takayama; Shih-Kang Fan
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 3.164

4.  Tug of War between Condensate Phases in a Minimal Macromolecular System.

Authors:  Archishman Ghosh; Xiaojia Zhang; Huan-Xiang Zhou
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Liquid Nuclear Condensates Mechanically Sense and Restructure the Genome.

Authors:  Yongdae Shin; Yi-Che Chang; Daniel S W Lee; Joel Berry; David W Sanders; Pierre Ronceray; Ned S Wingreen; Mikko Haataja; Clifford P Brangwynne
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 6.  More than Just a Phase: Prions at the Crossroads of Epigenetic Inheritance and Evolutionary Change.

Authors:  Anupam K Chakravarty; Daniel F Jarosz
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 7.  The Cajal body and the nucleolus: "In a relationship" or "It's complicated"?

Authors:  Laura Trinkle-Mulcahy; Judith E Sleeman
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 4.652

Review 8.  The Role of RNA in Biological Phase Separations.

Authors:  Marta M Fay; Paul J Anderson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Point mutations in the N-terminal domain of transactive response DNA-binding protein 43 kDa (TDP-43) compromise its stability, dimerization, and functions.

Authors:  Miguel Mompeán; Valentina Romano; David Pantoja-Uceda; Cristiana Stuani; Francisco E Baralle; Emanuele Buratti; Douglas V Laurents
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 10.  SUMO-Mediated Regulation of Nuclear Functions and Signaling Processes.

Authors:  Xiaolan Zhao
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 17.970

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.