Literature DB >> 27211289

Comparative Effectiveness of a Patient Centered Pathology Report for Bladder Cancer Care.

Matthew Mossanen1, Liam C Macleod2, Alice Chu2, Jonathan L Wright2, Bruce Dalkin2, Daniel W Lin2, Lawrence True2, John L Gore2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patients have unprecedented access to their medical records. However, many documents, such as pathology reports, may be beyond the health literacy of most patients. We compared the effectiveness of bladder biopsy patient centered pathology reports with standard reports.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Local bladder cancer experts reached consensus on the important elements of a bladder biopsy pathology report to inform prognosis and counseling. Patient focus groups identified the patient centered formats and language to convey these elements and constructed a pilot patient centered pathology report. A total of 40 patients undergoing bladder biopsy were block randomized to receive the standard report with or without the patient centered report. We assessed patient self-efficacy, and provider communication and empathy, and tested bladder cancer knowledge at pathology disclosure and 1 month later. We compared study groups with descriptive statistics.
RESULTS: Experts identified stage, grade and histology as the most important elements of a bladder biopsy pathology report. Patients prioritized 3 themes, including narrative format, tumor stage illustration and risk stratification for recurrence. A total of 39 patients completed initial and followup assessments. Patients with the patient centered pathology report had improved ability to identify cancer stage compared to those with the standard report. Initially 58% of patients with the standard report vs 20% with the patient centered report were unable to describe stage but at followup this incidence was 47% vs 15% (p = 0.02 and 0.03, respectively). Those with the patient centered report also trended toward improved identification of cancer grade. Provider communication trended toward improvement for the patient centered report. Ratings of patient self-efficacy did not differ by report.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient centered pathology reports are associated with greater patient knowledge about the bladder cancer diagnosis. The reports may aid patient-provider communication. This pilot study may serve as a model for the development of patient centered pathology reports for other cancers.
Copyright © 2016 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision making; health communication; pathology; patient education as topic; urinary bladder neoplasms

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27211289     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  5 in total

1.  Prospective randomised controlled trial of written supplement to verbal communication of results to patients at the time of flexible cystoscopy.

Authors:  Frank D'Arcy; Chew Lin Yip; Kiran Manya; Paul McGivern; Rustom P Manecksha; Damien Bolton; Shomik Sengupta
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Creating patient-centered radiology reports to empower patients undergoing prostate magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Nathan Perlis; Antonio Finelli; Mike Lovas; Alejandro Berlin; Janet Papadakos; Sangeet Ghai; Vasiliki Bakas; Shabbir Alibhai; Odelia Lee; Adam Badzynski; David Wiljer; Alexis Lund; Amelia Di Meo; Joseph Cafazzo; Masoom Haider
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Inferring bladder cancer research prioritization from patient-generated online content.

Authors:  Matthew Mossanen; Alice Chu; Angela B Smith; John L Gore
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Nanotechnology in Bladder Cancer: Diagnosis and Treatment.

Authors:  Mahmood Barani; Seyedeh Maryam Hosseinikhah; Abbas Rahdar; Leila Farhoudi; Rabia Arshad; Magali Cucchiarini; Sadanand Pandey
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  A "Pathology Explanation Clinic (PEC)" for Patient-Centered Laboratory Medicine Test Results.

Authors:  Blake Gibson; Erika Bracamonte; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Margaret M Briehl; Gail P Barker; John B Weinstein; Ronald S Weinstein
Journal:  Acad Pathol       Date:  2018-03-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.