Literature DB >> 27209781

Restoring forest structure and process stabilizes forest carbon in wildfire-prone southwestern ponderosa pine forests.

Matthew D Hurteau, Shuang Liang, Katherine L Martin, Malcolm P North, George W Koch, Bruce A Hungate.   

Abstract

Changing climate and a legacy of fire-exclusion have increased the probability of high-severity wildfire, leading to an increased risk of forest carbon loss in ponderosa pine forests in the southwestern USA. Efforts to reduce high-severity fire risk through forest thinning and prescribed burning require both the removal and emission of carbon from these forests, and any potential carbon benefits from treatment may depend on the occurrence of wildfire. We sought to determine how forest treatments alter the effects of stochastic wildfire events on the forest carbon balance. We modeled three treatments (control, thin-only, and thin and burn) with and without the occurrence of wildfire. We evaluated how two different probabilities of wildfire occurrence, 1% and 2% per year, might alter the carbon balance of treatments. In the absence of wildfire, we found that thinning and burning treatments initially reduced total ecosystem carbon (TEC) and increased net ecosystem carbon balance (NECB). In the presence of wildfire, the thin and burn treatment TEC surpassed that of the control in year 40 at 2%/yr wildfire probability, and in year 51 at 1%/yr wildfire probability. NECB in the presence of wildfire showed a similar response to the no-wildfire scenarios: both thin-only and thin and burn treatments increased the C sink. Treatments increased TEC by reducing both mean wildfire severity and its variability. While the carbon balance of treatments may differ in more productive forest types, the carbon balance benefits from restoring forest structure and fire in southwestern ponderosa pine forests are clear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27209781     DOI: 10.1890/15-0337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  4 in total

1.  Potential greenhouse gas reductions from Natural Climate Solutions in Oregon, USA.

Authors:  Rose A Graves; Ryan D Haugo; Andrés Holz; Max Nielsen-Pincus; Aaron Jones; Bryce Kellogg; Cathy Macdonald; Kenneth Popper; Michael Schindel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Quantifying the Carbon Balance of Forest Restoration and Wildfire under Projected Climate in the Fire-Prone Southwestern US.

Authors:  Matthew D Hurteau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Large-scale forest restoration stabilizes carbon under climate change in Southwest United States.

Authors:  Lisa A McCauley; Marcos D Robles; Travis Woolley; Robert M Marshall; Alec Kretchun; David F Gori
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 6.105

4.  Still standing: Recent patterns of post-fire conifer refugia in ponderosa pine-dominated forests of the Colorado Front Range.

Authors:  Teresa B Chapman; Tania Schoennagel; Thomas T Veblen; Kyle C Rodman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.