Literature DB >> 27209777

A sonic net excludes birds from an airfield: implications for reducing bird strike and crop losses.

John P Swaddle, Dana L Moseley, Mark K Hinders, Elizabeth P Smith.   

Abstract

Collisions between birds and aircraft cause billions of dollars of damages annually to civil, commercial, and military aviation. Yet technology to reduce bird strike is not generally effective, especially over longer time periods. Previous information from our lab indicated that filling an area with acoustic noise, which masks important communication channels for birds, can displace European Starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) from food sources. Here we deployed a spatially controlled noise (termed a "sonic net"), designed to overlap with the frequency range of bird vocalizations, at an airfield. By conducting point counts, we monitored the presence of birds for four weeks before deployment of our sonic net, and for four weeks during deployment. We found an 82% reduction in bird presence in the sonic net area compared with change in the reference areas. This effect was as strong in the fourth week of exposure as in the first week. We also calculated the potential costs avoided resulting from this exclusion. We propose that spatially controlled acoustic manipulations that mask auditory communication for birds may be an effective long term and fairly benign way of excluding problem birds from areas of socioeconomic importance, such as airfields, agricultural sites, and commercial properties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27209777     DOI: 10.1890/15-0829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  5 in total

1.  Demonstration of a length limited parametric array.

Authors:  Elizabeth Skinner; Matthew Groves; Mark K Hinders
Journal:  Appl Acoust       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.639

2.  Automatic counting of birds in a bird deterrence field trial.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Simons; Mark K Hinders
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-10-06       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  Comparing acoustic and radar deterrence methods as mitigation measures to reduce human-bat impacts and conservation conflicts.

Authors:  Lia R V Gilmour; Marc W Holderied; Simon P C Pickering; Gareth Jones
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Exploiting common senses: sensory ecology meets wildlife conservation and management.

Authors:  Laura K Elmer; Christine L Madliger; Daniel T Blumstein; Chris K Elvidge; Esteban Fernández-Juricic; Andrij Z Horodysky; Nicholas S Johnson; Liam P McGuire; Ronald R Swaisgood; Steven J Cooke
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 3.079

5.  Aircraft sound exposure leads to song frequency decline and elevated aggression in wild chiffchaffs.

Authors:  Andrew D Wolfenden; Hans Slabbekoorn; Karolina Kluk; Selvino R de Kort
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 5.091

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.