Literature DB >> 27208318

Benefits for Type 2 Diabetes of Interrupting Prolonged Sitting With Brief Bouts of Light Walking or Simple Resistance Activities.

Paddy C Dempsey1, Robyn N Larsen2, Parneet Sethi2, Julian W Sacre2, Nora E Straznicky2, Neale D Cohen2, Ester Cerin3, Gavin W Lambert4, Neville Owen2, Bronwyn A Kingwell2, David W Dunstan5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether interrupting prolonged sitting with brief bouts of light-intensity walking (LW) or simple resistance activities (SRA) improves postprandial cardiometabolic risk markers in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In a randomized crossover trial, 24 inactive overweight/obese adults with T2D (14 men 62 ± 6 years old) underwent the following 8-h conditions on three separate days (with 6-14 days washout): uninterrupted sitting (control) (SIT), sitting plus 3-min bouts of LW (3.2 km · h(-1)) every 30 min, and sitting plus 3-min bouts of SRA (half-squats, calf raises, gluteal contractions, and knee raises) every 30 min. Standardized meals were consumed during each condition. Incremental areas under the curve (iAUCs) for glucose, insulin, C-peptide, and triglycerides were compared between conditions.
RESULTS: Compared with SIT, both activity-break conditions significantly attenuated iAUCs for glucose (SIT mean 24.2 mmol · h · L(-1) [95% CI 20.4-28.0] vs. LW 14.8 [11.0-18.6] and SRA 14.7 [10.9-18.5]), insulin (SIT 3,293 pmol · h · L(-1) [2,887-3,700] vs. LW 2,104 [1,696-2,511] and SRA 2,066 [1,660-2,473]), and C-peptide (SIT 15,641 pmol · h · L(-1) [14,353-16,929] vs. LW 11,504 [10,209-12,799] and SRA 11,012 [9,723-12,301]) (all P < 0.001). The iAUC for triglycerides was significantly attenuated for SRA (P < 0.001) but not for LW (SIT 4.8 mmol · h · L(-1) [3.6-6.0] vs. LW 4.0 [2.8-5.1] and SRA 2.9 [1.7-4.1]).
CONCLUSIONS: Interrupting prolonged sitting with brief bouts of LW or SRA attenuates acute postprandial glucose, insulin, C-peptide, and triglyceride responses in adults with T2D. With poor adherence to structured exercise, this approach is potentially beneficial and practical.
© 2016 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27208318     DOI: 10.2337/dc15-2336

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  78 in total

1.  Effect of frequent interruptions of sedentary time on nutrient metabolism in sedentary overweight male and female adults.

Authors:  Nathan P De Jong; Corey A Rynders; David A Goldstrohm; Zhaoxing Pan; Andrew H Lange; Carlos Mendez; Edward L Melanson; Daniel H Bessesen; Audrey Bergouignan
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2019-01-10

Review 2.  Sedentary Behavior and Body Weight and Composition in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies.

Authors:  Scott D I Campbell; Bradley J Brosnan; Anna K Y Chu; C Murray Skeaff; Nancy J Rehrer; Tracy L Perry; Meredith C Peddie
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Sedentary behaviour is a key determinant of metabolic inflexibility.

Authors:  Corey A Rynders; Stephane Blanc; Nathan DeJong; Daniel H Bessesen; Audrey Bergouignan
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Adding exercise or subtracting sitting time for glycaemic control: where do we stand?

Authors:  Paddy C Dempsey; Megan S Grace; David W Dunstan
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 5.  Targeting Reductions in Sitting Time to Increase Physical Activity and Improve Health.

Authors:  Sarah K Keadle; David E Conroy; Matthew P Buman; David W Dunstan; Charles E Matthews
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  Sedentary Behavior and Prevalent Diabetes in 6,166 Older Women: The Objective Physical Activity and Cardiovascular Health Study.

Authors:  John Bellettiere; Genevieve N Healy; Michael J LaMonte; Jacqueline Kerr; Kelly R Evenson; Eileen Rillamas-Sun; Chongzhi Di; David M Buchner; Melbourne F Hovell; Andrea Z LaCroix
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 6.053

7.  The Acute Metabolic and Vascular Impact of Interrupting Prolonged Sitting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Travis J Saunders; Hayden F Atkinson; Jamie Burr; Brittany MacEwen; C Murray Skeaff; Meredith C Peddie
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 8.  Sitting Less and Moving More: Improved Glycaemic Control for Type 2 Diabetes Prevention and Management.

Authors:  Paddy C Dempsey; Neville Owen; Thomas E Yates; Bronwyn A Kingwell; David W Dunstan
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.810

9.  Resistant Hypertension: Detection, Evaluation, and Management: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Robert M Carey; David A Calhoun; George L Bakris; Robert D Brook; Stacie L Daugherty; Cheryl R Dennison-Himmelfarb; Brent M Egan; John M Flack; Samuel S Gidding; Eric Judd; Daniel T Lackland; Cheryl L Laffer; Christopher Newton-Cheh; Steven M Smith; Sandra J Taler; Stephen C Textor; Tanya N Turan; William B White
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 10.190

10.  Interrupting prolonged sitting in type 2 diabetes: nocturnal persistence of improved glycaemic control.

Authors:  Paddy C Dempsey; Jennifer M Blankenship; Robyn N Larsen; Julian W Sacre; Parneet Sethi; Nora E Straznicky; Neale D Cohen; Ester Cerin; Gavin W Lambert; Neville Owen; Bronwyn A Kingwell; David W Dunstan
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 10.122

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.