Literature DB >> 27208133

Effects of Intertidal Harvest Practices on Levels of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus Bacteria in Oysters.

J L Jones1, T P Kinsey2, L W Johnson3, R Porso3, B Friedman4, M Curtis4, P Wesighan4, R Schuster4, J C Bowers5.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus can grow rapidly in shellfish subjected to ambient air conditions, such as during intertidal exposure. In this study, levels of total and pathogenic (tdh(+) and/or trh(+)) V. parahaemolyticus and total V. vulnificus were determined in oysters collected from two study locations where intertidal harvest practices are common. Samples were collected directly off intertidal flats, after exposure (ambient air [Washington State] or refrigerated [New Jersey]), and after reimmersion by natural tidal cycles. Samples were processed using a most-probable-number (MPN) real-time PCR method for total and pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus or V. vulnificus In Washington State, the mean levels of V. parahaemolyticus increased 1.38 log MPN/g following intertidal exposure and dropped 1.41 log MPN/g after reimmersion for 1 day, but the levels were dependent upon the container type utilized. Pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus levels followed a similar trend. However, V. vulnificus levels increased 0.10 log MPN/g during intertidal exposure in Washington but decreased by >1 log MPN/g after reimmersion. In New Jersey, initial levels of all vibrios studied were not significantly altered during the refrigerated sorting and containerizing process. However, there was an increase in levels after the first day of reimmersion by 0.79, 0.72, 0.92, and 0.71 log MPN/g for total, tdh(+) and trh(+) V. parahaemolyticus, and V. vulnificus, respectively. The levels of all targets decreased to those similar to background after a second day of reimmersion. These data indicate that the intertidal harvest and handling practices for oysters that were studied in Washington and New Jersey do not increase the risk of illness from V. parahaemolyticus or V. vulnificus IMPORTANCE: Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus are the leading causes of seafood-associated infectious morbidity and mortality in the United States. Vibrio spp. can grow rapidly in shellfish subjected to ambient air conditions, such as during periods of intertidal exposure. When oysters are submersed with the incoming tide, the vibrios can be purged. However, data on the rates of increase and purging during intertidal harvest are scarce, which limits the accuracy of risk assessments. The objective of this study was to help fill these data gaps by determining the levels of total and pathogenic (tdh(+) and/or trh(+)) V. parahaemolyticus and V. vulnificus in oysters from two locations where intertidal harvest practices are common, using the current industry practices. The data generated provide insight into the responses of Vibrio spp. to relevant practices of the industry and public health, which can be incorporated into risk management decisions.
Copyright © 2016, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27208133      PMCID: PMC4984298          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00721-16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  24 in total

1.  Molecular epidemiologic evidence for association of thermostable direct hemolysin (TDH) and TDH-related hemolysin of Vibrio parahaemolyticus with gastroenteritis.

Authors:  H Shirai; H Ito; T Hirayama; Y Nakamoto; N Nakabayashi; K Kumagai; Y Takeda; M Nishibuchi
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.441

2.  Genotype is correlated with but does not predict virulence of Vibrio vulnificus biotype 1 in subcutaneously inoculated, iron dextran-treated mice.

Authors:  Patrick C Thiaville; Keri L Bourdage; Anita C Wright; Melissa Farrell-Evans; Cynthia Wilson Garvan; Paul A Gulig
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2011-01-03       Impact factor: 3.441

3.  A rapid and simple PCR analysis indicates there are two subgroups of Vibrio vulnificus which correlate with clinical or environmental isolation.

Authors:  Thomas M Rosche; Yutaka Yano; James D Oliver
Journal:  Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.955

Review 4.  Diarrhea induced by infection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus.

Authors:  Takaaki Shimohata; Akira Takahashi
Journal:  J Med Invest       Date:  2010-08

5.  Development and validation of a predictive model for the growth of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in post-harvest shellstock oysters.

Authors:  Salina Parveen; Ligia DaSilva; Angelo DePaola; John Bowers; Chanelle White; Kumudini Apsara Munasinghe; Kathy Brohawn; Meshack Mudoh; Mark Tamplin
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 5.277

6.  Real-time PCR analysis of Vibrio vulnificus from oysters.

Authors:  Mark S Campbell; Anita C Wright
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Preliminary study of transplanting as a process for reducing levels of Vibrio vulnificus and Vibrio parahaemolyticus in shellstock oysters.

Authors:  William C Walton; Chris Nelson; Mona Hochman; John Schwarz
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.077

8.  Effects of temperature and salinity on the survival of Vibrio vulnificus in seawater and shellfish.

Authors:  C W Kaspar; M L Tamplin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Sequence polymorphism of the 16S rRNA gene of Vibrio vulnificus is a possible indicator of strain virulence.

Authors:  William B Nilsson; Rohinee N Paranjype; Angelo DePaola; Mark S Strom
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Foodborne illness acquired in the United States--major pathogens.

Authors:  Elaine Scallan; Robert M Hoekstra; Frederick J Angulo; Robert V Tauxe; Marc-Alain Widdowson; Sharon L Roy; Jeffery L Jones; Patricia M Griffin
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  4 in total

1.  Vibrio parahaemolyticus in the Chesapeake Bay: Operational In Situ Prediction and Forecast Models Can Benefit from Inclusion of Lagged Water Quality Measurements.

Authors:  Benjamin J K Davis; John M Jacobs; Benjamin Zaitchik; Angelo DePaola; Frank C Curriero
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Nested Spatial and Temporal Modeling of Environmental Conditions Associated With Genetic Markers of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Washington State Pacific Oysters.

Authors:  Brendan Fries; Benjamin J K Davis; Anne E Corrigan; Angelo DePaola; Frank C Curriero
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  The release of a distinct cell type from swarm colonies facilitates dissemination of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in the environment.

Authors:  Carolina Freitas; Timo Glatter; Simon Ringgaard
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 10.302

4.  Associations of Environmental Conditions and Vibrio parahaemolyticus Genetic Markers in Washington State Pacific Oysters.

Authors:  Aspen Flynn; Benjamin J K Davis; Erika Atherly; Gina Olson; John C Bowers; Angelo DePaola; Frank C Curriero
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 5.640

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.