| Literature DB >> 31866972 |
Aspen Flynn1, Benjamin J K Davis1,2, Erika Atherly3, Gina Olson4, John C Bowers5, Angelo DePaola6, Frank C Curriero1,2.
Abstract
Vibrio parahaemolyticus is a naturally occurring bacterium in estuarine waters and is a major cause of seafood-borne illness. The bacterium has been consistently identified in Pacific Northwest waters and elevated illness rates of vibriosis in Washington State have raised concerns among growers, risk managers, and consumers of Pacific oysters (Crassostrea gigas). In order to better understand pre-harvest variation of V. parahaemolyticus in the region, abundance of total and potentially pathogenic strains of the bacterium in a large number of Washington State Pacific oyster samples were compared with environmental conditions at the time of sampling. The Washington Department of Health regularly sampled oysters between June and September at over 21 locations from 2014 to 2018, resulting in over 946 samples. V. parahaemolyticus strains carrying three genetic markers, tlh, trh, and tdh, were enumerated in oyster tissue using a most probable number-PCR analysis. Tobit regressions and seemingly unrelated estimations were used to formally assess relationships between environmental measures and genetic markers. All genetic markers were found to be positively associated with temperature, independent of the abundance of other genetic markers. Surface water temperature displayed a non-linear relationship, with no association observed between any genetic marker in the warmest waters. There were also stark differences between surface and shore water temperature models. Salinity was not found to be substantially associated with any of the genetic variables. The relative abundance of tdh+ strains given total V. parahaemolyticus abundance (pathogenic ratio tdh:tlh) was negatively associated with water temperature in colder waters and decreased exponentially as total V. parahaemolyticus abundance increased. Strains carrying the trh gene had a pronounced positive association with strains carrying the tdh gene but was also negatively associated with the tdh:tlh pathogenic ratio. These results suggest that there are ecological relationships of competition, growth, and survival for V. parahaemolyticus strains in the oyster tissue matrix. This work also improves the overall understanding of environmental associations with V. parahaemolyticus in Washington State Pacific oysters, laying the groundwork for future risk mitigation efforts in the region.Entities:
Keywords: Crassostrea gigas; Pacific oysters; Vibrio parahaemolyticus; Washington; genetic markers; seafood-borne illness; temperature
Year: 2019 PMID: 31866972 PMCID: PMC6904363 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02797
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1Map of Washington State shellfish sampling sites between 2014 and 2018. Panel A displays the coastal bays, panel B (main map) includes South Puget Sound and Hood Canal, and panel C displays Samish Bay in the northern waters. Basemap attributed to ESRI (2019b).
Descriptive characteristics of environmental and genetic variables, as well as their variation across sampling regions.
| Ambient air temperature (°C) | 18.4(15.7,21.7) | 18.2(15.7,21.8) | 19.0(16.0,22.0) | 17.2(15.9,18.6) | 18.0(15.7,19.1) |
| Surface water temperature (°C) | 19.0(17.4,21.0) | 19.4(17.3,21.4) | 18.8(18.0,20.6) | 18.5(17.5,19.2) | 20.4(16.5,23.6) |
| Tissue temperature (°C) | 21.6(18.0,26.0) | 21.7(17.7,26.3) | 22.0(18.4,26.2) | 19.3(17.1,21.0) | 20.4(16.7,23.0) |
| Salinity (‰) | 26.7(24.3,28.5) | 25.2(21.4,27.0) | 27.3(26.0,29.0) | 28.0(26.0,29.5) | 28.7(26.3,29.8) |
| 150(23,930) | 430(43,2300) | 93(9.3,430) | 4.3(3.1,22.5) | 23(9.3,75) | |
| 4.3(0.9,23) | 4.3(0.7,23) | 4.3(0.9,24) | 4.3(2.3,19.0) | 0.4(0.4,0.9) | |
| 0.2(0.2,0.9) | 0.2(0.2,0.9) | 0.2(0.2,0.9) | 0.2(0.2,0.6) | 0.2(0.2,0.2) | |
| 0.3(0.1,2.1) | 0.2(0.0,1.0) | 0.7(0.1,3.5) | 4.0(1.9,8.4) | 0.7(0.2,1.6) | |
FIGURE 2Boxplots of genetic markers by year for (A) tlh, (B) trh, (C) tdh, and (D) the tdh:tlh pathogenic ratio.
Pearson correlation matrix of all environmental and V. parahaemolyticus genetic variables.
| Ambient air temperature (°C) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Surface water temperature (°C) | 0.64 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Tissue temperature (°C) | 0.83 | 0.68 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Salinity (‰) | –0.08 | –0.12 | –0.12 | – | – | – | – | – |
| Log10- | 0.38 | 0.51 | 0.38 | –0.11 | – | – | – | – |
| Log10- | 0.44 | 0.46 | 0.45 | –0.05 | 0.68 | – | – | – |
| Log10- | 0.35 | 0.28 | 0.33 | –0.05 | 0.45 | 0.60 | – | – |
| Log10- | –0.19 | –0.38 | –0.21 | 0.09 | –0.82 | –0.37 | 0.15 | – |
FIGURE 3Scatter plots and fitted LOESS lines comparing the association of log-transformed tlh to (A) the tdh:tlh ratio and (B) the log-transformed tdh:tlh ratio.
Univariate and multivariate Tobit regression models of tlh, trh, and tdh and environmental/genetic covariates.
| Ambient air | 1.27 (1.22, 1.32) | 1.06 (0.99, 1.13) | 1.28 (1.24, 1.32) | 1.08 (1.01, 1.14) | 1.01 (0.97, 1.05) | 1.25 (1.19, 1.30) | 1.12 (1.03, 1.21) | 1.04 (0.99, 1.10) |
| temperature (°C) | ||||||||
| Surface water | ||||||||
| temperature (°C) | ||||||||
| 12.5–22 | 1.98 (1.81, 2.16) | 1.91 (1.73, 2.10) | 1.81 (1.66, 1.97) | 1.52 (1.38, 1.67) | 1.05 (0.97, 1.13) | 1.53 (1.36, 1.72) | 1.27 (1.12, 1.45) | 0.92 (0.83, 1.07) |
| 22–35.4 | 1.02 (0.84, 1.23) | 1.00 (0.83, 1.21) | 0.92 (0.77, 1.11) | 0.92 (0.77, 1.11) | 0.92 (0.81, 1.05) | 0.99 (0.78, 1.25) | 1.01 (0.78, 1.30) | 1.00 (0.79, 1.26) |
| Tissue | 1.22 (1.18, 1.26) | 0.96 (0.91, 1.02) | 1.23 (1.20, 1.27) | 1.05 (1.01, 1.10) | 1.06 (1.02, 1.10) | 1.19 (1.15, 1.24) | 1.04 (1.01, 1.07) | 1.05 (1.01, 1.10) |
| temperature (°C) | ||||||||
| Salinity (‰) | 0.95 (0.91, 0.98) | 1.03 (0.99, 1.06) | 0.98 (0.95, 0.99) | 0.99 (0.97, 1.03) | 0.98 (0.96, 1.00) | 0.97 (0.95, 0.99) | 1.00 (0.96, 1.04) | 0.99 (0.96, 1.02) |
| Log10- | – | – | 4.20 (3.79, 4.68) | – | 3.20 (2.84, 3.60) | 3.26 (2.76, 3.85) | – | 3.16 (2.61, 3.84) |
| Log10- | – | – | – | – | – | 5.54 (4.66, 6.58) | – | – |
| Log10- | – | – | 7.78 (6.43, 9.39) | – | 2.79 (2.38, 3.60) | – | – | – |
FIGURE 4Comparison of univariate regressions for shore versus surface water temperature and total V. parahaemolyticus.
Representative example of interaction (effect modification) between tissue temperature and air temperature on genetic marker abundance.
| Ambient air temperature (°C) | 0.91 (0.78, 1.06) | 1.12 (1.02, 1.22) |
| Tissue temperature (°C) | 1.09 (0.95, 1.25) | 1.15 (1.05, 1.25) |
Relative change in geometric mean with corresponding 95% confidence intervals of surface water temperature (<22°C) conditioned on water salinity.
| Surface water temperature (°C) | 3‰ | 1.48 (1.18, 1.86) | 0.85 (0.70, 0.99) |
| Surface water temperature (°C) | 35‰ | 2.16 (1.87, 2.51) | 0.59 (0.54, 0.67) |
Univariate and multivariate associations between the tdh:tlh ratio and environmental/genetic covariates based on linear combinations of seemingly unrelated estimations.
| Ambient air | 0.94 (0.89, 0.99) | 1.05 (0.97, 1.14) | 1.04 (0.97, 1.13) |
| temperature (°C) | |||
| Surface water | |||
| temperature (°C) | |||
| 12.5–22 | 0.79 (0.71, 0.88) | 0.67 (0.59, 0.77) | 0.66 (0.58, 0.75) |
| 22–35.4 | 0.97 (0.78, 1.21) | 0.99 (0.77, 1.28) | 0.98 (0.77, 1.24) |
| Tissue temperature (°C) | 0.95 (0.91, 0.99) | 1.07 (1.01, 1.15) | 1.06 (1.01, 1.15) |
| Salinity (‰) | 1.02 (0.99, 1.06) | 0.96 (0.93, 1.00) | 0.97 (0.94, 1.00) |
| Log10- | 0.71 (0.56, 0.88) | – | 0.85 (0.72, 0.98) |