Literature DB >> 27207659

Carcinogen-specific mutations in preferred Ras-Raf pathway oncogenes directed by strand bias.

Ross R Keller1,2, Shelley A Gestl1,2, Amy Q Lu1,2, Alicia Hoke1,2, David J Feith3, Edward J Gunther1,2,4.   

Abstract

Carcinogen exposures inscribe mutation patterns on cancer genomes and sometimes bias the acquisition of driver mutations toward preferred oncogenes, potentially dictating sensitivity to targeted agents. Whether and how carcinogen-specific mutation patterns direct activation of preferred oncogenes remains poorly understood. Here, mouse models of breast cancer were exploited to uncover a mechanistic link between strand-biased mutagenesis and oncogene preference. When chemical carcinogens were employed during Wnt1-initiated mammary tumorigenesis, exposure to either 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA) or N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) dramatically accelerated tumor onset. Mammary tumors that followed DMBA exposure nearly always activated the Ras pathway via somatic Hras(CAA61CTA) mutations. Surprisingly, mammary tumors that followed ENU exposure typically lacked Hras mutations, and instead activated the Ras pathway downstream via Braf(GTG636GAG) mutations. Hras(CAA61CTA) mutations involve an A-to-T change on the sense strand, whereas Braf(GTG636GAG) mutations involve an inverse T-to-A change, suggesting that strand-biased mutagenesis may determine oncogene preference. To examine this possibility further, we turned to an alternative Wnt-driven tumor model in which carcinogen exposures augment a latent mammary tumor predisposition in Apc(min) mice. DMBA and ENU each accelerated mammary tumor onset in Apc(min) mice by introducing somatic, "second-hit" Apc mutations. Consistent with our strand bias model, DMBA and ENU generated strikingly distinct Apc mutation patterns, including stringently strand-inverse mutation signatures at A:T sites. Crucially, these contrasting signatures precisely match those proposed to confer bias toward Hras(CAA61CTA) versus Braf(GTG636GAG) mutations in the original tumor sets. Our findings highlight a novel mechanism whereby exposure history acts through strand-biased mutagenesis to specify activation of preferred oncogenes.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27207659      PMCID: PMC4967214          DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgw061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carcinogenesis        ISSN: 0143-3334            Impact factor:   4.944


  34 in total

Review 1.  Melanoma: from mutations to medicine.

Authors:  Hensin Tsao; Lynda Chin; Levi A Garraway; David E Fisher
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Carcinogen-induced mutations in the mouse c-Ha-ras gene provide evidence of multiple pathways for tumor progression.

Authors:  K Brown; A Buchmann; A Balmain
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Comparison of the types of mutations induced by 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene in the lacI and hprt genes of Big Blue rats.

Authors:  R A Mittelstaedt; M G Manjanatha; S D Shelton; L E Lyn-Cook; J B Chen; A Aidoo; D A Casciano; R H Heflich
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.216

4.  β-Catenin signaling dosage dictates tissue-specific tumor predisposition in Apc-driven cancer.

Authors:  E R M Bakker; E Hoekstra; P F Franken; W Helvensteijn; C H M van Deurzen; W van Veelen; E J Kuipers; R Smits
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 9.867

5.  Mapping the hallmarks of lung adenocarcinoma with massively parallel sequencing.

Authors:  Marcin Imielinski; Alice H Berger; Peter S Hammerman; Bryan Hernandez; Trevor J Pugh; Eran Hodis; Jeonghee Cho; James Suh; Marzia Capelletti; Andrey Sivachenko; Carrie Sougnez; Daniel Auclair; Michael S Lawrence; Petar Stojanov; Kristian Cibulskis; Kyusam Choi; Luc de Waal; Tanaz Sharifnia; Angela Brooks; Heidi Greulich; Shantanu Banerji; Thomas Zander; Danila Seidel; Frauke Leenders; Sascha Ansén; Corinna Ludwig; Walburga Engel-Riedel; Erich Stoelben; Jürgen Wolf; Chandra Goparju; Kristin Thompson; Wendy Winckler; David Kwiatkowski; Bruce E Johnson; Pasi A Jänne; Vincent A Miller; William Pao; William D Travis; Harvey I Pass; Stacey B Gabriel; Eric S Lander; Roman K Thomas; Levi A Garraway; Gad Getz; Matthew Meyerson
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Direct mutagenesis of Ha-ras-1 oncogenes by N-nitroso-N-methylurea during initiation of mammary carcinogenesis in rats.

Authors:  H Zarbl; S Sukumar; A V Arthur; D Martin-Zanca; M Barbacid
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1985 May 30-Jun 5       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Mutations in the p53 tumor suppressor gene: clues to cancer etiology and molecular pathogenesis.

Authors:  M S Greenblatt; W P Bennett; M Hollstein; C C Harris
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1994-09-15       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer.

Authors:  Helen Davies; Graham R Bignell; Charles Cox; Philip Stephens; Sarah Edkins; Sheila Clegg; Jon Teague; Hayley Woffendin; Mathew J Garnett; William Bottomley; Neil Davis; Ed Dicks; Rebecca Ewing; Yvonne Floyd; Kristian Gray; Sarah Hall; Rachel Hawes; Jaime Hughes; Vivian Kosmidou; Andrew Menzies; Catherine Mould; Adrian Parker; Claire Stevens; Stephen Watt; Steven Hooper; Rebecca Wilson; Hiran Jayatilake; Barry A Gusterson; Colin Cooper; Janet Shipley; Darren Hargrave; Katherine Pritchard-Jones; Norman Maitland; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Gregory J Riggins; Darell D Bigner; Giuseppe Palmieri; Antonio Cossu; Adrienne Flanagan; Andrew Nicholson; Judy W C Ho; Suet Y Leung; Siu T Yuen; Barbara L Weber; Hilliard F Seigler; Timothy L Darrow; Hugh Paterson; Richard Marais; Christopher J Marshall; Richard Wooster; Michael R Stratton; P Andrew Futreal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-06-09       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Genetic mechanisms in Apc-mediated mammary tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Mari Kuraguchi; Nana Yaw Ohene-Baah; Dmitriy Sonkin; Roderick Terry Bronson; Raju Kucherlapati
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Evolution of somatic mutations in mammary tumors in transgenic mice is influenced by the inherited genotype.

Authors:  Katrina Podsypanina; Yi Li; Harold E Varmus
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 8.775

View more
  4 in total

1.  A Multistage Murine Breast Cancer Model Reveals Long-Lived Premalignant Clones Refractory to Parity-Induced Protection.

Authors:  Shuo Li; Shelley A Gestl; Edward J Gunther
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2019-11-07

2.  Prolactin synergizes with canonical Wnt signals to drive development of ER+ mammary tumors via activation of the Notch pathway.

Authors:  Kathleen A O'Leary; Debra E Rugowski; Michael P Shea; Ruth Sullivan; Amy R Moser; Linda A Schuler
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2021-01-17       Impact factor: 8.679

3.  Pubertal and adult windows of susceptibility to a high animal fat diet in Trp53-null mammary tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Yirong Zhu; Mark D Aupperlee; Yong Zhao; Ying Siow Tan; Erin L Kirk; Xuezheng Sun; Melissa A Troester; Richard C Schwartz; Sandra Z Haslam
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-12-13

4.  Evolution of Relapse-Proficient Subclones Constrained by Collateral Sensitivity to Oncogene Overdose in Wnt-Driven Mammary Cancer.

Authors:  Ross R Keller; Edward J Gunther
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 9.423

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.