A L Mikula1, S J Hetzel2, N Binkley3, P A Anderson4. 1. University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA. 2. Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA. 3. Department of Medicine - Geriatrics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA. 4. Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, UWMF Centennial Building, 1685 Highland Ave, 6th Floor, Madison, WI, 53705, USA. anderson@ortho.wisc.edu.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Height measurements are currently used to guide imaging decisions that assist in osteoporosis care, but their clinical reliability is largely unknown. We found both clinical height measurements and electronic health record height data to be unreliable. Improvement in height measurement is needed to improve osteoporosis care. INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy and reliability of clinical height measurement in a university healthcare clinical setting. METHODS: Electronic health record (EHR) review, direct measurement of clinical stadiometer accuracy, and observation of staff height measurement technique at outpatient facilities of the University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics. We examined 32 clinical stadiometers for reliability and observed 34 clinic staff perform height measurements at 12 outpatient primary care and specialty clinics. An EHR search identified 4711 men and women age 43 to 89 with no known metabolic bone disease who had more than one height measurement over 3 months. The short study period and exclusion were selected to evaluate change in recorded height not due to pathologic processes. RESULTS: Mean EHR recorded height change (first to last measurement) was -0.02 cm (SD 1.88 cm). Eighteen percent of patients had height measurement differences noted in the EHR of ≥2 cm over 3 months. The technical error of measurement (TEM) was 1.77 cm with a relative TEM of 1.04 %. None of the staff observed performing height measurements followed all recommended height measurement guidelines. Fifty percent of clinic staff reported they on occasion enter patient reported height into the EHR rather than performing a measurement. When performing direct measurements on stadiometers, the mean difference from a gold standard length was 0.24 cm (SD 0.80). Nine percent of stadiometers examined had an error of >1.5 cm. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical height measurements and EHR recorded height results are unreliable. Improvement in this measure is needed as an adjunct to improve osteoporosis care.
UNLABELLED: Height measurements are currently used to guide imaging decisions that assist in osteoporosis care, but their clinical reliability is largely unknown. We found both clinical height measurements and electronic health record height data to be unreliable. Improvement in height measurement is needed to improve osteoporosis care. INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy and reliability of clinical height measurement in a university healthcare clinical setting. METHODS: Electronic health record (EHR) review, direct measurement of clinical stadiometer accuracy, and observation of staff height measurement technique at outpatient facilities of the University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics. We examined 32 clinical stadiometers for reliability and observed 34 clinic staff perform height measurements at 12 outpatient primary care and specialty clinics. An EHR search identified 4711 men and women age 43 to 89 with no known metabolic bone disease who had more than one height measurement over 3 months. The short study period and exclusion were selected to evaluate change in recorded height not due to pathologic processes. RESULTS: Mean EHR recorded height change (first to last measurement) was -0.02 cm (SD 1.88 cm). Eighteen percent of patients had height measurement differences noted in the EHR of ≥2 cm over 3 months. The technical error of measurement (TEM) was 1.77 cm with a relative TEM of 1.04 %. None of the staff observed performing height measurements followed all recommended height measurement guidelines. Fifty percent of clinic staff reported they on occasion enter patient reported height into the EHR rather than performing a measurement. When performing direct measurements on stadiometers, the mean difference from a gold standard length was 0.24 cm (SD 0.80). Nine percent of stadiometers examined had an error of >1.5 cm. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical height measurements and EHR recorded height results are unreliable. Improvement in this measure is needed as an adjunct to improve osteoporosis care.
Authors: WanWan Xu; Subashan Perera; Donna Medich; Gail Fiorito; Julie Wagner; Loretta K Berger; Susan L Greenspan Journal: Bone Date: 2010-09-24 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: P De Miguel-Etayo; M I Mesana; G Cardon; I De Bourdeaudhuij; M Góźdź; P Socha; M Lateva; V Iotova; B V Koletzko; K Duvinage; O Androutsos; Y Manios; L A Moreno Journal: Obes Rev Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 9.213
Authors: Fabio Galbusera; Marc van Rijsbergen; Keita Ito; Jacques M Huyghe; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Hans-Joachim Wilke Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2014-01-31 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: H Jamaiyah; A Geeta; M N Safiza; G L Khor; N F Wong; C C Kee; R Rahmah; A Z Ahmad; S Suzana; W S Chen; M Rajaah; B Adam Journal: Med J Malaysia Date: 2010-06
Authors: S Stomfai; W Ahrens; K Bammann; E Kovács; S Mårild; N Michels; L A Moreno; H Pohlabeln; A Siani; M Tornaritis; T Veidebaum; D Molnár Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 5.095