Literature DB >> 27205890

A tailored three-dimensionally printable agarose-collagen blend allows encapsulation, spreading, and attachment of human umbilical artery smooth muscle cells.

Marius Köpf1, Daniela F Duarte Campos, Andreas Blaeser, Kshama S Sen, Horst Fischer.   

Abstract

In recent years, novel biofabrication technologies have enabled the rapid manufacture of hydrogel-cell suspensions into tissue-imitating constructs. The development of novel materials for biofabrication still remains a challenge due to a gap between contradicting requirements such as three-dimensional printability and optimal cytocompatibility. We hypothesise that blending of different hydrogels could lead to a novel material with favourable biological and printing properties. In our work, we combined agarose and type I collagen in order to develop a hydrogel blend capable of long-term cell encapsulation of human umbilical artery smooth muscle cells (HUASMCs) and 3D drop-on-demand printing. Different blends were prepared with 0.25%, 0.5%, 0.75%, and 1.5% agarose and 0.2% type I collagen. The cell morphology of HUASMCs and the printing accuracy were assessed for each agarose-collagen combination, keeping the content of collagen constant. The hydrogel blend which displayed sufficient cell spreading and printing accuracy (0.5% agarose, 0.2% type I collagen, AGR0.5COLL0.2) was then characterised based on swelling and degradation over 21 days and mechanical stiffness. The cellular response regarding cell attachment of HUASMCs embedded in the hydrogel blend was further studied using SEM, TEM, and TPLSM. Printing trials were fabricated in a drop-on-demand printing process. The swelling and degradation evaluation showed an average of 20% mass loss and less than 10% swelling. AGR0.5COLL0.2 exhibited significant increase in stiffness compared to pure agarose and type I collagen. In addition, columns of AGR0.5COLL0.2 three centimeters in height were successfully printed submerged in cooled perfluorocarbon, proving the intrinsic printability of the hydrogel blend. Ultimately, a promising novel hydrogel blend showing cell spreading and attachment as well as suitability for bioprinting was identified and could, for example, serve in the manufacture of in vitro 3D models to capture more complex features of disease and drug discovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27205890     DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/8/2/025011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofabrication        ISSN: 1758-5082            Impact factor:   9.954


  17 in total

1.  Bioprinting of Cartilage and Skin Tissue Analogs Utilizing a Novel Passive Mixing Unit Technique for Bioink Precellularization.

Authors:  Patrick Scott Thayer; Linnea Stridh Orrhult; Héctor Martínez
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 2.  Biomaterials for Bioprinting Microvasculature.

Authors:  Ryan W Barrs; Jia Jia; Sophia E Silver; Michael Yost; Ying Mei
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 3.  Bioprinting: From Tissue and Organ Development to in Vitro Models.

Authors:  Carlos Mota; Sandra Camarero-Espinosa; Matthew B Baker; Paul Wieringa; Lorenzo Moroni
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  A biofabrication method to align cells within bioprinted photocrosslinkable and cell-degradable hydrogel constructs via embedded fibers.

Authors:  Margaret E Prendergast; Matthew D Davidson; Jason A Burdick
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 11.061

Review 5.  Stem Cell-Laden Hydrogel-Based 3D Bioprinting for Bone and Cartilage Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Zhimin Yang; Ping Yi; Zhongyue Liu; Wenchao Zhang; Lin Mei; Chengyao Feng; Chao Tu; Zhihong Li
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-05-17

Review 6.  An Overview of Extracellular Matrix-Based Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting.

Authors:  Haonan Wang; Huaqing Yu; Xia Zhou; Jilong Zhang; Hongrui Zhou; Haitong Hao; Lina Ding; Huiying Li; Yanru Gu; Junchi Ma; Jianfeng Qiu; Depeng Ma
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-05-11

Review 7.  Physical and Chemical Factors Influencing the Printability of Hydrogel-based Extrusion Bioinks.

Authors:  Sang Cheon Lee; Gregory Gillispie; Peter Prim; Sang Jin Lee
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 60.622

8.  Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting: A Scientometric Analysis of Two Decades of Progress.

Authors:  Sara Cristina Pedroza-González; Marisela Rodriguez-Salvador; Baruc Emet Pérez-Benítez; Mario Moisés Alvarez; Grissel Trujillo-de Santiago
Journal:  Int J Bioprint       Date:  2021-04-20

Review 9.  3-Dimensional Bioprinting of Cardiovascular Tissues: Emerging Technology.

Authors:  Kevin Sung; Nisha R Patel; Nureddin Ashammakhi; Kim-Lien Nguyen
Journal:  JACC Basic Transl Sci       Date:  2021-05-24

Review 10.  3D bioprinting for skin tissue engineering: Current status and perspectives.

Authors:  Tingting Weng; Wei Zhang; Yilan Xia; Pan Wu; Min Yang; Ronghua Jin; Sizhan Xia; Jialiang Wang; Chuangang You; Chunmao Han; Xingang Wang
Journal:  J Tissue Eng       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 7.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.