BACKGROUND: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are commonly used antihypertensive medications that have been reported to affect aberrant angiogenesis and the dysregulated inflammatory response. Because of such mechanisms, it was hypothesized that these medications might affect the tumor response to neoadjuvant radiation in patients with rectal cancer. METHODS: One hundred fifteen patients who were treated with neoadjuvant radiation at the University of Wisconsin (UW) between 1999 and 2012 were identified. Univariate analyses were performed with anonymized patient data. In a second independent data set, 186 patients with rectal cancer who were treated with neoadjuvant radiation at the Queen's Medical Center of the University of Hawaii (UH) between 1995 and 2010 were identified. These data were independently analyzed as before. Multivariate analyses were performed with aggregate data. RESULTS: Among patients taking ACEIs/ARBs in the UW data set, a significant 3-fold increase in the rate of pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant therapy (52% vs 17%, P = .001) was observed. This finding was confirmed in the UH data set, in which a significant 2-fold-increased pCR rate (24% vs 12%, P = .03) was observed. Identified patient and treatment characteristics were otherwise balanced between patients taking and not taking ACEIs/ARBs. No significant effect was observed on pCR rates with other medications, including statins, metformin, and aspirin. Multivariate analyses of aggregate data identified ACEI/ARB use as a strong predictor of pCR (odds ratio, 4.02; 95% confidence interval, 2.06-7.82; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The incidental use of ACEIs/ARBs among patients with rectal cancer is associated with a significantly increased rate of pCR after neoadjuvant treatment. Cancer 2016;122:2487-95.
BACKGROUND:Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are commonly used antihypertensive medications that have been reported to affect aberrant angiogenesis and the dysregulated inflammatory response. Because of such mechanisms, it was hypothesized that these medications might affect the tumor response to neoadjuvant radiation in patients with rectal cancer. METHODS: One hundred fifteen patients who were treated with neoadjuvant radiation at the University of Wisconsin (UW) between 1999 and 2012 were identified. Univariate analyses were performed with anonymized patient data. In a second independent data set, 186 patients with rectal cancer who were treated with neoadjuvant radiation at the Queen's Medical Center of the University of Hawaii (UH) between 1995 and 2010 were identified. These data were independently analyzed as before. Multivariate analyses were performed with aggregate data. RESULTS: Among patients taking ACEIs/ARBs in the UW data set, a significant 3-fold increase in the rate of pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant therapy (52% vs 17%, P = .001) was observed. This finding was confirmed in the UH data set, in which a significant 2-fold-increased pCR rate (24% vs 12%, P = .03) was observed. Identified patient and treatment characteristics were otherwise balanced between patients taking and not taking ACEIs/ARBs. No significant effect was observed on pCR rates with other medications, including statins, metformin, and aspirin. Multivariate analyses of aggregate data identified ACEI/ARB use as a strong predictor of pCR (odds ratio, 4.02; 95% confidence interval, 2.06-7.82; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The incidental use of ACEIs/ARBs among patients with rectal cancer is associated with a significantly increased rate of pCR after neoadjuvant treatment. Cancer 2016;122:2487-95.
Authors: Tammy C Lee; Dana Greene-Schloesser; Valerie Payne; Debra I Diz; Fang-Chi Hsu; Mitra Kooshki; Rashida Mustafa; David R Riddle; Weiling Zhao; Michael D Chan; Mike E Robbins Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2012-06-12 Impact factor: 2.841
Authors: K I Abdul-Jalil; K M Sheehan; J Kehoe; R Cummins; A O'Grady; D A McNamara; J Deasy; O Breathnach; L Grogan; B D P O'Neill; C Faul; I Parker; E W Kay; B T Hennessy; P Gillen Journal: Colorectal Dis Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 3.788
Authors: Julio García-Aguilar; Enrique Hernandez de Anda; Prayuth Sirivongs; Suk-Hwan Lee; Robert D Madoff; David A Rothenberger Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: S Takeshita; H Tomiyama; N Yokoyama; Y Kawamura; T Furukawa; Y Ishigai; T Shibano; T Isshiki; T Sato Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: Y Nakai; H Isayama; H Ijichi; T Sasaki; N Sasahira; K Hirano; H Kogure; K Kawakubo; H Yagioka; Y Yashima; S Mizuno; K Yamamoto; T Arizumi; O Togawa; S Matsubara; T Tsujino; K Tateishi; M Tada; M Omata; K Koike Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2010-10-26 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Matthew F Kalady; Luiz Felipe de Campos-Lobato; Luca Stocchi; Daniel P Geisler; David Dietz; Ian C Lavery; Victor W Fazio Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Georgina E Riddiough; Katrina A Walsh; Theodora Fifis; Georgios Kastrappis; Bang M Tran; Elizabeth Vincan; Vijayaragavan Muralidharan; Christopher Christophi; Claire L Gordon; Marcos V Perini Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-05-09 Impact factor: 6.208
Authors: Matthias Pinter; Arndt Weinmann; Marcus-Alexander Wörns; Florian Hucke; Simona Bota; Jens U Marquardt; Dan G Duda; Rakesh K Jain; Peter R Galle; Michael Trauner; Markus Peck-Radosavljevic; Wolfgang Sieghart Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2017-02-26 Impact factor: 4.623