| Literature DB >> 27200376 |
Antonio M Fea1, Vittoria Aragno1, Valeria Testa1, Federica Machetta1, Simone Parisi2, Sergio D'Antico3, Roberta Spinetta1, Enrico Fusaro2, Federico M Grignolo1.
Abstract
Purpose. To determine the effectiveness of autologous platelet lysate (APL) eye drops in patients with primary Sjögren syndrome (SS) dry eye, refractory to standard therapy, in comparison with patients treated with artificial tears. We focused on the effect of APL on cornea morphology with the in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM). Methods. Patients were assigned to two groups: group A used autologous platelet lysate QID, and group B used preservative-free artificial tears QID, for 90 days. Ophthalmological assessments included ocular surface disease index (OSDI), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), Schirmer test, fluorescein score, and breakup time (BUT). A subgroup of patients in group A underwent IVCM: corneal basal epithelium, subbasal nerves, Langerhans cells, anterior stroma activated keratocytes, and reflectivity were evaluated. Results. 60 eyes of 30 patients were enrolled; in group A (n = 20 patients) mean OSDI, fluorescein score, and BUT showed significant improvement compared with group B (n = 10 patients). The IVCM showed a significant increase in basal epithelium cells density and subbasal nerve plexus density and number and a decrease in Langerhans cells density (p < 0.05). Conclusion. APL was found effective in the treatment of SS dry eye. IVCM seems to be a useful tool to visualize cornea morphologic modifications.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27200376 PMCID: PMC4854989 DOI: 10.1155/2016/8406832
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1An example of neuron tracing with NeuronJ software. The plugin facilitates the tracing and quantification of nerves.
Patients characteristics at baseline. Group A = patients assigned to APL; group B = patients assigned to artificial tears.
| Group A | Group B |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female, | 19.0 (95) | 10.0 (100.0) | 1.00 |
| Age, mean (SD) years | 60.4 (11.68) | 59.5 (13.34) | 0.758 |
| Dry eye, mean (SD) years | 7.6 (6.5) | 7.5 (6.2) | 0.767 |
Ophthalmological assessment.
| Group A | Group B |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSDI | ||||
|
| Media (SD) | 60.56 (17.69) | 60.67 (16.19) | 0.821 |
|
| Media (SD) | 21.75 (9.86) | 53.60 (14.91) | <0.001 |
|
| 0.000438 | 0.059336 | ||
|
| ||||
| Fluorescein score (0–5) | ||||
|
| Median (IQR) | 2 (2) | 3 (2.5) | 0.17 |
|
| Median (IQR) | 1 (2) | 3 (2) | <0.001 |
|
| <0.001 | 0.463 | ||
|
| ||||
| FBUT (sec) | ||||
|
| Median (IQR) | 2 (1) | 2 (2) | 0.18 |
|
| Median (IQR) | 3.5 (2) | 2 (1) | <0.001 |
|
| 0.005 | 0.463 | ||
|
| ||||
| BCVA | ||||
|
| Median (IQR) | 8 (4) | 6 (3.5) | 0.218 |
|
| Median (IQR) | 8 (3.5) | 6 (3.5) | 0.100 |
|
| 0.008 | 0.317 | ||
|
| ||||
| Schirmer test (mm) | ||||
|
| Median (IQR) | 3 (2) | 3 (2) | 0.989 |
|
| Median (IQR) | 3 (1) | 3 (0.5) | 0.544 |
|
| 0.0611 | 0.328065 | ||
|
| ||||
| Anterior blepharitis (grades 0–4) | ||||
|
| Median (IQR) | 1 (1) | 2 (1.5) | 0.092 |
|
| Median (IQR) | 1 (0.5) | 2 (1.5) | 0.778 |
|
| 0.055 | 0.109 | ||
|
| ||||
| Posterior blepharitis (grades 0–4) | ||||
|
| Median (IQR) | 1 (1) | 1.5 (1) | 0.748 |
|
| Median (IQR) | 1 (1) | 1.5 (1.5) | 0.036 |
|
| 0.011 | 0.310 | ||
|
| ||||
| Lipcof (grades 0–3) | ||||
|
| Median (IQR) | 3 (2) | 3 (1) | 0.419 |
|
| Median (IQR) | 3 (2) | 3 (1) | 0.994 |
|
| 1.000 | 1.000 | ||
|
| ||||
| OPI (>/<1) | ||||
|
| Median (IQR) | 0.29 | 0.23 | 0.778 |
|
| Median (IQR) | 0.53 | 0.25 | <0.001 |
|
| <0.001 | 0.245 | ||
T0 = time 0; T90 = time 90 days; SD = standard deviation; IQR = interquartile range; OSDI = ocular surface disease index; OPI = ocular protection index; FBUT = breakup time; BCVA = best corrected visual acuity.
Statistically significant results.
Figure 2Comparison of OSDI score between patients in group A (APL) and patients in group B (artificial tears). OSDI score was significantly lower in group A patients compared with the group B patients after treatment (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Comparison of BUT values between patients in group A (APL) and patients in group B (artificial tear). BUT increased significantly in group A patients compared with the group B patients after treatment (p < 0.05).
Figure 4Comparison of fluorescein score between patients in group A (APL) and patients in group B (artificial tear). Fluorescein score was significantly lower in group A patients compared with the group B patients after treatment (p < 0.05).
Basal characteristics of subgroup 1 (nonevaluated by IVCM) and subgroup 2 (evaluated by IVCM).
| Subgroup 1 | Subgroup 2 |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | Media (SD) | 63.67 (8.73) | 57.6 (11.76) | 0.692 |
| Sex | Female : male (%) | 9 : 10 (90) | 10 : 0 (100) | 1.000 |
| OSDI | Media (SD) | 63.73 (21.74) | 56.07 (19.3) | 0.397 |
| Fluorescein score | Median (IQR) | 2 (1) | 1.5 (1.5) | 0.744 |
| BUT | Median (IQR) | 2 (1.5) | 3 (1) | 0.287 |
| Schirmer test | Median (IQR) | 3 (1) | 4 (1) | 0.055 |
Figure 5Confocal images of subbasal nerves, in central corneal sectors. At baseline (a–c), many Langerhans cells can be observed at this level; after 3-month-long treatment (b–d), a decreased number of inflammatory cells and an increased number of nerves were found. Figures show the improvement in corneal subbasal nerve plexus for two representative patients treated with APL.
Confocal microscopy assessments, subgroup 2.
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Basal epithelial cell density (cell/mm2) | |||
| Media | 5810.52 | 6680.16 | 0.005 |
| SD | 859.78 | 739.91 | |
| Nerve number ( | |||
| Media | 5.11 | 7.72 | 0.005 |
| SD | 2.60 | 3.62 | |
| Nerve density ( | |||
| Median | 1070.25 | 1655.0 | 0.003 |
| IQR | 906.46 | 1631.67 | |
| Gray value anterior stroma (OU) | |||
| Median | 50.33 | 52.00 | 0.222 |
| IQR | 11 | 5.65 | |
| Activated keratocyte (cell/mm2) | |||
| Media | 42.04 | 39.08 | 0.976 |
| SD | 20.72 | 20.64 | |
| Langerhans cells (cell/mm2) | |||
| Median | 34.50 | 31.33 | 0.024 |
| IQR | 127.33 | 93.34 |
Statistically significant results.