OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair on overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms in women with POP and the effect of baseline POP severity on improvement in OAB after surgical repair of POP. And we also tried to identify any preoperative factors for persistent postoperative OAB symptoms. METHODS: A total of 87 patients with coexisting POP and OAB who underwent surgical correction of POP were included and retrospectively analyzed and postoperative data was obtained by telephone interview. OAB was defined as an affirmative response to item no. 15 (urinary frequency) and item no. 16 (urge incontinence) of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory. POP severity was dichotomized by Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification stage 1 to 2 (n=22) versus stage 3 to 4 (n=65). RESULTS: OAB symptoms were significantly improved after surgical treatment (P<0.001). But there was no significant differences in postoperative improvement of frequency and urge incontinence between stage 1 to 2 group versus stage 3 to 4 group. Preoperative demographic factors (age, parity, and POP stage) were not significantly related to persistent postoperative OAB symptoms. CONCLUSION: Women with coexisting POP and OAB who undergo surgical repair experience significant improvement in OAB symptoms after surgery, but severity of POP had no significant difference in improvement of OAB symptoms. Postoperative persistent OAB symptoms were not related to age, parity, body mass index, and POP stage.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair on overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms in women with POP and the effect of baseline POP severity on improvement in OAB after surgical repair of POP. And we also tried to identify any preoperative factors for persistent postoperative OAB symptoms. METHODS: A total of 87 patients with coexisting POP and OAB who underwent surgical correction of POP were included and retrospectively analyzed and postoperative data was obtained by telephone interview. OAB was defined as an affirmative response to item no. 15 (urinary frequency) and item no. 16 (urge incontinence) of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory. POP severity was dichotomized by Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification stage 1 to 2 (n=22) versus stage 3 to 4 (n=65). RESULTS:OAB symptoms were significantly improved after surgical treatment (P<0.001). But there was no significant differences in postoperative improvement of frequency and urge incontinence between stage 1 to 2 group versus stage 3 to 4 group. Preoperative demographic factors (age, parity, and POP stage) were not significantly related to persistent postoperative OAB symptoms. CONCLUSION:Women with coexisting POP and OAB who undergo surgical repair experience significant improvement in OAB symptoms after surgery, but severity of POP had no significant difference in improvement of OAB symptoms. Postoperative persistent OAB symptoms were not related to age, parity, body mass index, and POP stage.
Entities:
Keywords:
Overactive urinary bladder; Pelvic organ prolapse; Urge urinary incontinence; Urinary frequency
Authors: Paul Abrams; Linda Cardozo; Magnus Fall; Derek Griffiths; Peter Rosier; Ulf Ulmsten; Philip Van Kerrebroeck; Arne Victor; Alan Wein Journal: Urology Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: R C Bump; A Mattiasson; K Bø; L P Brubaker; J O DeLancey; P Klarskov; B L Shull; A R Smith Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 1996-07 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Sophie G Fletcher; Rashel M Haverkorn; Jingsheng Yan; Joy J Lee; Philippe E Zimmern; Gary E Lemack Journal: Neurourol Urodyn Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 2.696
Authors: T A de Boer; S Salvatore; L Cardozo; C Chapple; C Kelleher; P van Kerrebroeck; M G Kirby; H Koelbl; M Espuna-Pons; I Milsom; A Tubaro; A Wagg; M E Vierhout Journal: Neurourol Urodyn Date: 2010 Impact factor: 2.696
Authors: Jeffrey L Clemons; Vivian C Aguilar; Tara A Tillinghast; Neil D Jackson; Deborah L Myers Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Tiny A de Boer; Kirsten B Kluivers; Mariella I J Withagen; Alfredo L Milani; Mark E Vierhout Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2010-04-24 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Anne P Cameron; Abigail R Smith; H Henry Lai; Catherine S Bradley; Alice B Liu; Robert M Merion; Brenda W Gillespie; Cindy L Amundsen; David Cella; James W Griffith; Jonathan B Wiseman; Karl J Kreder; Kimberly S Kenton; Margaret E Helmuth; Matthew O Fraser; J Quentin Clemens; Ziya Kirkali; John W Kusek; Nazema Y Siddiqui Journal: Neurourol Urodyn Date: 2018-04-10 Impact factor: 2.696
Authors: Lauren Giugale; Amaanti Sridhar; Kimberly L Ferrante; Yuko M Komesu; Isuzu Meyer; Ariana L Smith; Deborah Myers; Anthony G Visco; Marie Fidela R Paraiso; Donna Mazloomdoost; Marie Gantz; Halina M Zyczynski Journal: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 2.091
Authors: Musa Kayondo; Dan Kabonge Kaye; Richard Migisha; Rodgers Tugume; Paul Kalyebara Kato; Henry Mark Lugobe; Verena Geissbüehler Journal: BMC Womens Health Date: 2021-06-25 Impact factor: 2.809