Literature DB >> 27199891

Bone Fragility in Turner Syndrome: Mechanisms and Prevention Strategies.

Maria Felicia Faienza1, Annamaria Ventura1, Silvia Colucci2, Luciano Cavallo1, Maria Grano3, Giacomina Brunetti2.   

Abstract

Bone fragility is recognized as one of the major comorbidities in Turner syndrome (TS). The mechanisms underlying bone impairment in affected patients are not clearly elucidated, but estrogen deficiency and X-chromosomal abnormalities represent important factors. Moreover, although many girls with TS undergo recombinant growth hormone therapy to treat short stature, the efficacy of this treatment on bone mineral density is controversial. The present review will focus on bone fragility in subjects with TS, providing an overview on the pathogenic mechanisms and some prevention strategies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Turner syndrome; bone; bone mineral density; estrogens; fractures

Year:  2016        PMID: 27199891      PMCID: PMC4844601          DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2016.00034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)        ISSN: 1664-2392            Impact factor:   5.555


Introduction

Turner syndrome (TS) is a congenital disease caused by partial or complete loss of one sex chromosome, which occurs in 1:2500 female live births. Monosomy 45,X0 is present in about 45% of cases (1), while the remaining TS patients show mosaic patterns with one or more additional cell lines and structural aberration (mostly Xq isochromosomes) (1). The major phenotypic characteristics of TS subjects are short stature, ovarian dysgenesis, cardiac anomalies, and neurocognitive problems (2). Additionally, a low bone mineral density (BMD) and an increased risk of fractures have been described (3–5). The pathogenic mechanisms responsible of bone impairment in TS have not been completely elucidated. It is not clear whether the bone fragility is due to X-chromosomal abnormalities or is caused by estrogen deficiency that occurs during developmental age and in adulthood (3, 6, 7). Moreover, although many girls with TS undergo recombinant growth hormone (rGH) therapy to treat short stature in childhood, the efficacy of this treatment on BMD is controversial. The present review will focus on bone fragility in subjects with TS, providing an overview on the underlying mechanisms and some options for management of bone impairment.

Bone Fragility in TS

Low BMD and osteoporosis are clinical features in women with ovarian failure caused by TS, affecting these subjects often two to three decades earlier than that noted in postmenopausal osteoporosis (3, 8). According to a large epidemiological study, the risk of fractures for TS women seems to be about two times higher than general population, especially at metacarpal bones, femoral neck, lower spine, and forearm (9). A fracture prevalence of 32.2%, and the forearm as the site most affected, has been reported by other authors (4). Two peaks of incidence have been observed, during childhood (non-osteoporotic fractures) and after 45 years (osteoporotic fractures) (4). However, the fracture data in TS are controversial. In particular, the fracture prevalence may have been overestimated in studies on older patients, who had never been treated with estrogens or had received a delayed and suboptimal therapy (9). Several studies have demonstrated that the detection of a low BMD in TS subjects by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has some limits, as the influence of body size on areal BMD (aBMD) interpretation (10). Smaller bones project less density on the measured surface than bigger ones, resulting in lower T- and Z-scores in short individuals (11). In fact, the apparent BMD deficit in TS subjects is reduced when the reduced size of bones has been taken into account (3, 11). The development of new bone imaging diagnostics, as peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT), has allowed the evaluation of bone geometry and bone compartmental characteristics of TS subjects. In fact, pQCT provides precise measurements of three-dimensional bone density without the influence of bone size, and leads to assess trabecular and cortical bone density independently (12). In this respect, using pQCT, a low cortical BMD, with marked thinning of the bone cortex, and normal trabecular BMD of radial bone have been observed in TS adolescents (12), and similar results were found in TS young adults (13). These findings suggested that selective decrease of cortical bone may confer biomechanical disadvantage and predispose TS subjects to bone fragility and fractures (12). Nevertheless, other studies have documented a reduction of both cortical and trabecular bone in TS subjects during and after puberty by using pQCT (14), whereas a normal (15) or increased cortical BMD (16) has been observed by using high-resolution pQCT (HR-pQCT). Table 1 collects the principal studies on BMD measurements in TS subjects.
Table 1

BMD measurements in TS patients.

Population Sample (n)Age (years)BMD measurementOutcomeReference
40 TS patients16–45DXA at the lumbar spine and femoral neckSubjects with TS and those with primary amenorrhea had severe osteopenia compared with healthy controlsDavies et al. (8)
40 subjects with primary amenorrhea
40 healthy controls
9 TS patients with spontaneous puberty14.9 ± 1.3DXA at the lumbar spineBMD values were in the normal range in TS patients with spontaneous puberty and in the osteopenia range in puberty induced group.Carrascosa et al. (17)
18 puberty induced TS patients (adolescent)16.8 ± 0.7
10 puberty induced TS patients (young adult)20.9 ± 0.7
21 GH and estrogen treated TS patients19.5 ± 2.3pQCT at the distal metaphysis and at the proximal diaphysisBMC was decreased, resulting in a low total vBMD. This was due to decreased cortical thickness at both sites of measurement, whereas trabecular vBMD of the metaphysis was normalBechtold et al. (13)
40 TS patients34.0 ± 11.0DXA at the lumbar spine and femoral neckMean areal bone density was significantly lower at the lumbar spine and femoral neck in TS women than in controlsBakalov et al. (11)
43 controls32.0 ± 8.0
23 GH-treated TS patients21.5 ± 9.4DXA at RAD-1/3, RAD-UD, AP spine L1–L4, total hipThere was no significant difference in the two groups in BMD or BMAD at the wrist, hip, spine, or whole-body BMCBakalov et al. (18)
23 non-GH-treated TS patients21.7 ± 9.4
68 TS patients belonging to three age groups with different rGH treatment6.1 ± 2.1Phalangeal radiographic absorptiometryMost untreated young TS patients have a normal vBMD. During 7 years of GH treatment the BMD SD score increased significantlySas et al. (19)
6.7 ± 2.4
6.5 ± 2.4
60 TS patients36.7 ± 9.6DXA at the lumbar spine (L2–L4), the hip (femoral neck and trochanteric region), and the non-dominant forearmBMC and aBMD were universally reduced in TS, whereas vBMD was slightly reduced in the spineGranvholt et al. (3)
59 controls36.0 ± 9.5
50 TS patients30–59DXA at the lumbar spine (L2–L4); QCT at vertebral bodies L1–L2Lumbar spine BMD was significantly reduced in women not taking ERT according to current guidelinesHanton et al. (20)
21 TS patients20–40DXA at the lumbar spine and proximal femurThe bone mineral density at the lumbar spine and proximal femur increased after 3 years of HRTKhastgir et al. (21)
16 TS patients29.1 ± 5.2DXA at the lumbar spine (L1–L4) and of whole bodyBMD of lumbar spine and whole body of TS were significantly lower than age-matched normal subjectsSuganuma et al. (22)
83 TS patients12.76 ± 4.4TB, LS, and FN DXAThe results show a height-independent prepubertal decrease in bone mass accrual, which ceased with pubertyHögler et al. (23)
22 TS patients12.7 ± 3.8DXA at the lumbar spine and femur and pQCT scanning of the non-dominant forearm, distal metaphyseal site, and the proximal diaphysis of radiusTS is associated with reduced BMAD at the femoral neck; pQCT data suggest that cortical density is reduced with sparing of trabecular boneHolroyd et al. (12)
21 controls12.9 ± 3.8
67 TS patients6.0–19.4pQCT at the non-dominant radiusCortical vBMD was decreased in all TS patients. Height-, age-, and cortical thickness-adjusted cortical vBMD were positively correlated with the duration of GH therapy and to estrogen administration. Girls with a history of fractures had lower total vBMD at the metaphysis compared to non-fractured TS girlsSoucek et al. (14)
32 TS patients35 (20–61)HR-pQCT at non-dominant distal radius and tibiaTS patients had compromised trabecular microarchitecture and lower bone strength at radius and tibiaHansen et al. (16)
32 controls36 (19–58)
22 TS patients10.3 ± 2.2pQCT at forearmTrabecular BMD and bone strength index were normal in TS as well as SHOX-D patients. Increased total bone area and thin cortex were observed at the proximal radius for TS and SHOX-D patientsSoucek et al. (24)
10 children with SHOX-D10.3 ± 2.1
24 adolescent TS patients17.1 ± 3.1DXA at the lumbar spine and femoral neck; phalangeal QUSAdolescents with TS had a normal lumbar vBMD and a reduced vBMD at the femoral neck. Phalangeal QUS represents a useful method to identify subjects with increased fracture riskVierucci et al. (25)
60 TS patients belonging to three age groups5.94 ± 3.27DXA at the lumbar spine (L2–L4)Bone impairment was detectable by DXA in subjects aged under 10, although it became more evident with agingFaienza et al. (26)
13.51 ± 2.06
23.45 ± 6.80
88 TS patients with primary amenorrhea17–58DXA at the lumbar spine (L2–L4)TS patients receiving late initiation of HRT had a BMD significantly lower than the early initiation group or spontaneous menstrual cycles groupNakamura et al. (27)
12 TS patients with spontaneous menstrual cycles18–40
32 TS patients15.3 ± 3.2pQCT at the non-dominant radius and tibiaWhereas the cortical BMD was decreased in the radius, it was increased in the tibia. After correcting the cortical BMD for the partial volume effect, the mean Z-score was normal in the radius in TS. The corrected cortical BMD values were similar in the radius and tibiaSoucek et al. (15)
28 TS patients17–45DXA of lumbar spine, hip, and radius and HR-pQCT scans of the radius and tibiaNo significant difference in DXA-derived BMD and HR-pQCT micro-architectural parameters was detected between childhood GH treatment compared to no treatment in TSNour et al. (10)

AP, anteroposterior; BMC, bone mineral content; BMD, bone mineral density; aBMD, area BMD; vBMD, volumetric BMD; BMAD, bone mineral apparent density; DXA, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; TS, Turner syndrome; FN, femoral neck; GH, growth hormone; rGH, recombinant GH; HRT, hormone replacement therapy; LS, lumbar spine; pQCT, peripheral quantitative computed tomography; HR-pQCT, high-resolution pQCT; QUS, quantitative ultrasound; RAD-1/3, one-third proximal radius; RAD-UD, ultradistal radius; TB, total body.

BMD measurements in TS patients. AP, anteroposterior; BMC, bone mineral content; BMD, bone mineral density; aBMD, area BMD; vBMD, volumetric BMD; BMAD, bone mineral apparent density; DXA, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; TS, Turner syndrome; FN, femoral neck; GH, growth hormone; rGH, recombinant GH; HRT, hormone replacement therapy; LS, lumbar spine; pQCT, peripheral quantitative computed tomography; HR-pQCT, high-resolution pQCT; QUS, quantitative ultrasound; RAD-1/3, one-third proximal radius; RAD-UD, ultradistal radius; TB, total body. These conflicting findings are due to different diagnostic imaging and characteristics of TS subjects (10). In particular, HR-pQCT provides a refined image resolution, which permits detailed evaluation of bone microarchitecture, eliminating the partial volume artifacts that may influence cortical BMD measurements, determined with pQCT (15, 16). Moreover, studies which assessed BMD in adolescent TS patients may not be appropriately matched with healthy controls (12). In fact, most TS individuals under 13 years of age do not have completed puberty, whereas the majority of age-matched healthy girls could have achieved menarche with a significant increase in bone mass accrual (28). Therefore, different factors rather than reduced cortical BMD might predispose TS subjects to higher risk of fractures, such as altered bone geometry (bone size, shape, and microarchitecture) and decrease of trabecular BMD or motor dysfunction (29). The bone microarchitecture is influenced by the continuous remodeling, a coordinated process between formation and degradation of bone, respectively, managed by osteoblasts (OBs) and osteoclasts (OCs). The by-products of these processes can be quantified in serum and urine, and used as markers of the balance in bone activity (30, 31). Markers of bone formation are represented by alkaline phosphatase (ALP), bone-specific ALP, procollagen I-amino-terminal propeptide (PINP), procollagen III-amino terminal propeptide (PIIINP), and osteocalcin, while markers of bone resorption comprise C-telopeptide fragments of type 1 collagen (ICTP), carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen (CTX), and N-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type 1 collagen (NTX). In TS, analysis of these biochemical markers revealed an increased resorption of bone, with normal or decreased bone formation, suggesting imbalance in bone remodeling (3, 26, 32). However, little is known about the relation of aBMD and volumetric BMD (vBMD) to bone markers in young TS (8, 33, 34). Furthermore, as skeletal muscle contraction represents a mechanical stimulus for bone development (35–37), it was suggest that impaired motor skills and reduced muscle power described in TS, may contribute to increased fracture rate (29).

Pathogenetic Mechanisms of Bone Fragility in TS

The mechanisms responsible of bone fragility in TS have not been completely elucidated. While some authors ascribed bone fragility to estrogen deficiency occurring during development and in adulthood (17, 20, 38), other researches sustain a direct or indirect effect of X-chromosomal abnormalities (14, 39, 40). Moreover, some comorbidities of the syndrome could be involved in bone loss. Finally, the effect of rGH therapy on BMD remains to be clarified. Figure 1A shows the potential mechanisms of poor bone health in TS.
Figure 1

(A) Potential mechanisms of bone fragility in Turner syndrome. (B) Monitoring and management of bone health in Turner syndrome.

(A) Potential mechanisms of bone fragility in Turner syndrome. (B) Monitoring and management of bone health in Turner syndrome.

Estrogen Deficiency

Ovarian dysfunction is a common complication in TS subjects, and estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) is needed for the induction of puberty and for the maintenance of bone and cardiac health (2). The effects of estrogens on bone seem to be dose-dependent: low levels of exposure may increase the mechanical sensitivity of the periosteum, whereas higher concentrations may inhibit periosteal apposition, reducing cortical thickness (41). Although the appropriate estrogen dosage to treat hypogonadism and the timing of the therapy are still debated (27), estrogen replacement has been shown to be important to avoid a rapid decrease in BMD and to optimize bone mineral accretion in TS adolescents (23). In particular, early initiation of ERT is more effective on bone mass acquisition (27), and low-dose administration in childhood has also neurocognitive and behavioral benefits (42). The possible downside of early ERT is the reduction of adult height by accelerating epiphyseal fusion, which can be avoided by combining ultra-low-dose estrogen with rGH therapy. An increased BMD due to augmented trabecular bone volume, and an unchanged cortical bone, has been demonstrated after 3 years of treatment with subcutaneous estradiol implants in TS young women (21). These findings suggested a role of estrogens not only in preventing bone loss but also in increase of bone mass. In adult TS patients, the assumption of exogenous estrogen is important for prevention of osteoporosis (43) and in reducing risk factors for atherosclerosis (44, 45), but the optimal dose at the different ages, administration route, type of estrogen and gestagen remain to be determined (46).

Follicle-Stimulating Hormone

Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) has a well-established role in reproduction, stimulating ovarian folliculogenesis, and estrogen synthesis, but recently has emerged also a role in bone metabolism. Some studies in mouse or human cells showed a positive direct or indirect FSH effect on OC differentiation and function (47). In particular, FSH enhances osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption directly by binding to FSH receptor expressed on OCs and their precursors (47), and indirectly by triggering the production of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) from bone marrow macrophages, granulocytes, and T-cells (48). This proinflammatory cytokine stimulates receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) expression and synergizes with RANKL signaling to maximize OC formation (49). High FSH circulating levels have been associated with bone loss (50) and with bone turnover markers in pre- and perimenopausal women (51). Furthermore, hypergonadotropic amenorrheic women have low BMD because of a potential direct effect of FSH on bone metabolism (52), while decrease in FSH serum levels resulting from estrogen therapy is associated with raise in bone mass (53). Girls with TS have a biphasic pattern of gonadotrophin levels with high FSH and LH serum levels during childhood and at the time of expected puberty, in subjects with monosomy 45,X0 respect to those with mosaicism (54). A recent study by Faienza et al. demonstrated a high osteoclastogenic potential in girls and young women with TS, before and after puberty induction. This osteoclastogenic potential seems to be supported by the elevated FSH serum levels at prepubertal stage, before ERT, and by high RANKL levels in young women on continuous ERT (26). These results confirmed the indirect action of FSH in stimulation of osteoclastogenesis, through increase of TNF-α by bone marrow macrophages/granulocytes and T-cells (55) and by promoting the expression of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B (RANK) on human monocytes (56).

X-Chromosomal Abnormalities

Haploinsufficiency of the X-linked genes (57, 58) that escapes X inactivation (59) is one of the key factors responsible for clinical phenotype of TS. In particular, haploinsufficiency of SHOX gene, located in the pseudoautosomal region of sexual chromosomes, seems to play a key role in growth failure typical of these subjects (27, 57). Furthermore, SHOX deficiency (SHOX-D) has been proposed as the most probable gene deficit responsible for the other skeletal alterations in TS, such as short metacarpals, high-arched palate, cubitus valgus, Madelung deformity, and mesomelia (58, 60). Moreover, despite the exact molecular-genetic effect of SHOX on bone is not clear, and limited informations are available on the intracellular pathways activated by SHOX (61, 62), it is suggested that isolated SHOX-D may alter bone geometry and microarchitecture, rather than bone strength (63). Similar changes in bone geometry at the proximal radius (increased total bone area and thin cortex) have been found in prepubertal TS girls and SHOX-D patients, suggesting that SHOX haploinsufficiency is the causative factor leading to the changes in shape and geometry of the radius observed in TS. Interestingly, altered bone geometry parameters were more pronounced in patients with isolated SHOX-D respect to TS, and this can be explained partially by preserved SHOX function in mosaic TS subjects (24). Others genes potentially involved in bone abnormalities of TS have recently been identified through analysis of the transcriptome profiles of human 45,X0 and 46,XX fibroblast cells (64). In 45,X0 karyotype, the analysis revealed a downregulation of different genes, directly or indirectly associated with bone metabolism, such as bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2), associated with bone mineralization; insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF2), placental growth factor (PGF), and prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase 1 (PTGS1) involved in bone repair, formation, and development (65–70), and secreted frizzled-related protein 1 (SFRP1) associated with Wnt signaling and affecting OB proliferation and differentiation (71, 72). Further study on tissue-specific gene expression profiling will help to understand the molecular mechanism involved in bone abnormality of TS subjects.

Effect of rGH Therapy on Bone Health in TS

Recombinant growth hormone therapy is widely used for treatment of growth failure in girls with TS, although TS patients are not GH deficient (GHD) (5). The efficacy of rhGH therapy on BMD in TS is controversial (18, 73) also due to the small or lacking untreated control groups (12). Some studies suggest an improvement of bone density (19, 73) and some reported none effects (17), while others found decrease of BMD (18, 22). A recent study evaluated the effects of GH treatment on bone in 28 young adults with TS using HR-pQCT. The bone strength was evaluated through measurements of finite element (FE) analysis and polar moment of inertia (pMOI) (10). The authors reported an increase in total bone size (length and cross-sectional area) and pMOI in GH-treated TS patients, while no significant differences in DXA-derived BMD, HR-pQCT microarchitectural parameter, and FE-estimated bone strength were found between treated and non-treated groups (10). These findings suggested that the higher pMOI and increase of bone size may reduce fracture risk in GH-treated TS subjects.

Comorbidities Affecting Bone Health in TS

Different comorbidities of TS may affect bone health, such as obesity, diabetes, and some autoimmune disorders [celiac disease (CD), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and thyroid disorders]. Body composition is altered in TS with increased total and visceral fat mass, reduced lean mass, and augmented BMI (74, 75). Moreover, the risk of both type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus is increased (9), with fasting hyperinsulinemia and impaired glucose tolerance in 25–78% of adult TS patients (44, 76). Obesity, and in particular visceral adiposity, has been related to low BMD and greater fracture risk (77). Several evidences support this thesis. In particular, a strong relationship between inhibition of the OB formation and induction of the adipocyte differentiation has been demonstrated (78, 79). Moreover, the increased circulating and tissue proinflammatory cytokines in obesity may promote OC activity and bone resorption (80, 81). Diabetes is considered an important risk factor for fractures, even if the mechanisms responsible for greater bone fragility in diabetic patients remain to be elucidated (82, 83). Celiac disease and IBD represent other clinical conditions affecting TS patients, which may predispose them to bone fragility (28), due to malabsorption of calcium and other macro- and microelements essential for bone metabolism, and the presence of chronic inflammation (84). Hypothyroidism affects up to 70% of TS patients, often with autoimmune cause (85), and it is related to the increased risk of fractures, although the mechanism remains unclear (86).

Management of Bone Fragility in TS

Strategies to prevent osteoporosis and fractures should been considered in TS subjects, just during pediatric age (87). In the first instance, bone mineral status should been assessed in childhood to detect TS subjects at increased risk of bone impairment and in order to carry out preventive measures (25). In particular, it is preferable to use diagnostic methods that take into account for reduced bone size of these patients, such as pQCT or volumetric transformation of DXA data (88). Moreover, the use of non-invasive and radiation-free tools, such as phalangeal quantitative ultrasound (QUS), can be particularly useful for routinely assessing of BMD in children and adolescents with TS (25). Bone mineral density evaluation should be repeated frequently in TS patients who were most exposed to bone fragility, such as subjects undergone to glucocorticoid treatment, with experience of low-impact fracture or in absence of adherence to ERT (5) (Figure 1B). The main measures to optimize bone health in TS are represented by the timely introduction of ERT and continuation of estrogen therapy through young adult life according to consensus guidelines (26, 27, 89) (Figure 1B). Many studies have found low serum vitamin D levels in TS subjects, which may contribute to the reduction of BMD (3, 33). Moreover, a positive correlation between bone size and density in TS, and level of physical activity has been reported (90). Thus, supplementation of vitamin D and active lifestyle, including weight bearing and regular physical activity, could confer benefit in maintaining bone health in TS (91).

Conclusion

Although data on impairment of bone density and geometry and fracture risk are often controversial, bone fragility is recognized as one of the major lifelong comorbidities in TS subjects. The pathogenetic mechanisms responsible of bone impairment remain to be well clarified, although estrogen deficiency and X chromosomal abnormalities represent important factors. An enhanced spontaneous osteoclastogenesis has been demonstrated to occur in girls and young women with TS before and after pubertal induction with ERT. This process seems to be more active in girls before puberty induction and supported by the high FSH serum levels observed at prepubertal stage, while in young women on continuous ERT, the effects on OCs seem to be mediated mostly by high RANKL levels. We recommended to consider the average age of 9 years as a crucial time point for the introduction of ERT. In the future, a neutralizing FSH antibody could be useful. In the meantime, a regimen combining the earlier introduction of ERT with rGH treatment in girls with TS could have the effect to reduce FSH levels and to preserve bone health in these subjects.

Author Contributions

All the authors wrote a section of the review and critically revised the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  91 in total

1.  Bone mineral density assessed by phalangeal radiographic absorptiometry before and during long-term growth hormone treatment in girls with Turner's syndrome participating in a randomized dose-response study.

Authors:  T C Sas; S M de Muinck Keizer-Schrama; T Stijnen; A van Teunenbroek; W J van Leeuwen; A Asarfi; R R van Rijn; S L Drop
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.756

2.  FSH directly regulates bone mass.

Authors:  Li Sun; Yuanzhen Peng; Allison C Sharrow; Jameel Iqbal; Zhiyuan Zhang; Dionysios J Papachristou; Samir Zaidi; Ling-Ling Zhu; Beatrice B Yaroslavskiy; Hang Zhou; Alberta Zallone; M Ram Sairam; T Rajendra Kumar; Wei Bo; Jonathan Braun; Luis Cardoso-Landa; Mitchell B Schaffler; Baljit S Moonga; Harry C Blair; Mone Zaidi
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Bone mineral density in adult patients with Turner's syndrome: analyses of the effectiveness of GH and ovarian steroid hormone replacement therapies.

Authors:  Nobuhiko Suganuma; Madoka Furuhashi; Takashi Hirooka; Takayuki Moriwaki; Yukiharu Hasegawa; Osamu Mori; Masamichi Ogawa
Journal:  Endocr J       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.349

4.  Reduced cortical bone density with normal trabecular bone density in girls with Turner syndrome.

Authors:  C R Holroyd; J H Davies; P Taylor; K Jameson; C Rivett; C Cooper; E M Dennison
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  The role of the SHOX gene in the pathophysiology of Turner syndrome.

Authors:  Conceicao S Oliveira; Cresio Alves
Journal:  Endocrinol Nutr       Date:  2011-09-16

6.  Bone mineral density in middle-aged women with Turner's syndrome.

Authors:  L Sylvén; K Hagenfeldt; H Ringertz
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 6.664

7.  The impact of obesity on cardiovascular risk factors in Turner's syndrome.

Authors:  M Elsheikh; G S Conway
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.478

8.  Importance of estrogen on bone health in Turner syndrome: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  Wolfgang Högler; Julie Briody; Bin Moore; Sarah Garnett; Pei Wen Lu; Christopher T Cowell
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 9.  Osteoporosis and inflammation.

Authors:  Gregory R Mundy
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 7.110

10.  Insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF-2) potentiates BMP-9-induced osteogenic differentiation and bone formation.

Authors:  Liang Chen; Wei Jiang; Jiayi Huang; Bai-Cheng He; Guo-Wei Zuo; Wenli Zhang; Qing Luo; Qiong Shi; Bing-Qiang Zhang; Eric R Wagner; Jinyong Luo; Min Tang; Christian Wietholt; Xiaoji Luo; Yang Bi; Yuxi Su; Bo Liu; Stephanie H Kim; Connie J He; Yawen Hu; Jikun Shen; Farbod Rastegar; Enyi Huang; Yanhong Gao; Jian-Li Gao; Jian-Zhong Zhou; Russell R Reid; Hue H Luu; Rex C Haydon; Tong-Chuan He; Zhong-Liang Deng
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  10 in total

1.  The use of quantitative ultrasound in a tertiary-level children hospital: role in the follow-up of chronically ill patients.

Authors:  Albina Tummolo; Giacomina Brunetti; Mario Giordano; Vincenza Carbone; Maria Felicia Faienza; Maurizio Aricò; Sabino Pesce
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2022-01-29

Review 2.  A Track Record on SHOX: From Basic Research to Complex Models and Therapy.

Authors:  Antonio Marchini; Tsutomu Ogata; Gudrun A Rappold
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 19.871

3.  Body composition and bone mineral status in patients with Turner syndrome.

Authors:  Kun Shi; Li Liu; Yao-Juan He; Duan Li; Lian-Xiong Yuan; Gendie E Lash; Li Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Health status in 1040 adults with disorders of sex development (DSD): a European multicenter study.

Authors:  Henrik Falhammar; Hedi Claahsen-van der Grinten; Nicole Reisch; Jolanta Slowikowska-Hilczer; Anna Nordenström; Robert Roehle; Claire Bouvattier; Baudewijntje P C Kreukels; Birgit Köhler
Journal:  Endocr Connect       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.335

5.  Rare copy number variants in the genome of Chinese female children and adolescents with Turner syndrome.

Authors:  Li Li; Qingfeng Li; Qiong Wang; Li Liu; Ru Li; Huishu Liu; Yaojuan He; Gendie E Lash
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 3.840

6.  Tactile Sensitivity of Women with Turner Syndrome.

Authors:  Julia Jajor; Anna Kostiukow; Włodzimierz Samborski; Elżbieta Rostkowska; Aleksandra Śliwa; Katarzyna Antosiak-Cyrak
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 7.  Mechanisms of Bone Impairment in Sickle Bone Disease.

Authors:  Paola Giordano; Flavia Urbano; Giuseppe Lassandro; Maria Felicia Faienza
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Human Sex Matters: Y-Linked Lysine Demethylase 5D Drives Accelerated Male Craniofacial Osteogenic Differentiation.

Authors:  Madlen Merten; Johannes F W Greiner; Tarek Niemann; Meike Grosse Venhaus; Daniel Kronenberg; Richard Stange; Dirk Wähnert; Christian Kaltschmidt; Thomas Vordemvenne; Barbara Kaltschmidt
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 6.600

9.  Role of Wnt-signaling inhibitors DKK-1 and sclerostin in bone fragility associated with Turner syndrome.

Authors:  M Chiarito; L Piacente; N Chaoul; P Pontrelli; G D'Amato; A Grandone; G Russo; M E Street; M G Wasniewska; G Brunetti; M F Faienza
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 5.467

Review 10.  Genetic approaches to metabolic bone diseases.

Authors:  Fadil M Hannan; Paul J Newey; Michael P Whyte; Rajesh V Thakker
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 4.335

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.