Literature DB >> 27199493

Ultrastructural Insights into the Biological Significance of Persisting DNA Damage Foci after Low Doses of Ionizing Radiation.

Yvonne Lorat1, Stefanie Schanz1, Claudia E Rübe2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) enables the delivery of high doses to target volume while sparing surrounding nontargeted tissues. IMRT treatment, however, substantially increases the normal tissue volume receiving low-dose irradiation, but the biologic consequences are unclear. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Using mouse strains that varied in genetic DNA repair capacity, we investigated the DNA damage response of cortical neurons during daily low-dose irradiation (0.1 Gy). Using light and electron microscopic approaches, we enumerated and characterized DNA damage foci as marker for double-strand breaks (DSBs).
RESULTS: During repeated low-dose irradiation, cortical neurons in brain tissues of all mouse strains had a significant increase of persisting foci with cumulative doses, with the most pronounced accumulation of large-sized foci in repair-deficient mice. Electron microscopic analysis revealed that persisting foci in repair-proficient neurons reflect chromatin alterations in heterochromatin, but not persistently unrepaired DSBs. Repair-deficient SCID neurons, by contrast, showed high numbers of unrepaired DSBs in eu- and heterochromatin, emphasizing the fundamental role of DNA-PKcs in DSB rejoining, independent of chromatin status. In repair-deficient ATM-/- neurons, large persisting damage foci reflect multiple unrepaired DSBs concentrated at the boundary of heterochromatin due to disturbed KAP1 phosphorylation.
CONCLUSION: Repeated low-dose irradiation leads to the accumulation of persisting DNA damage foci in cortical neurons and thus may adversely affect brain tissue and increase the risk of carcinogenesis. Multiple unrepaired DSBs account for large-sized foci in repair-deficient neurons, thus quantifying foci alone may underestimate extent and complexity of persistent DNA damage. Clin Cancer Res; 22(21); 5300-11. ©2016 AACR. ©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27199493     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-3081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  9 in total

1.  Quantification of radiation-induced DNA double strand break repair foci to evaluate and predict biological responses to ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Sébastien Penninckx; Eloise Pariset; Egle Cekanaviciute; Sylvain V Costes
Journal:  NAR Cancer       Date:  2021-12-22

Review 2.  Individual response of humans to ionising radiation: governing factors and importance for radiological protection.

Authors:  K E Applegate; W Rühm; A Wojcik; M Bourguignon; A Brenner; K Hamasaki; T Imai; M Imaizumi; T Imaoka; S Kakinuma; T Kamada; N Nishimura; N Okonogi; K Ozasa; C E Rübe; A Sadakane; R Sakata; Y Shimada; K Yoshida; S Bouffler
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2020-03-07       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  α-Particle-induced DNA damage tracks in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of [223Ra]RaCl2-treated prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  S Schumann; U Eberlein; C Lapa; J Müller; S Serfling; M Lassmann; H Scherthan
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Low-dose or low-dose-rate ionizing radiation-induced bioeffects in animal models.

Authors:  Feng Ru Tang; Weng Keong Loke; Boo Cheong Khoo
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.724

5.  Radiosensitizing effect of diosmetin on radioresistant lung cancer cells via Akt signaling pathway.

Authors:  Zhijie Xu; Yuanliang Yan; Lingfang Xiao; Shuang Dai; Shuangshuang Zeng; Long Qian; Lin Wang; Xue Yang; Yi Xiao; Zhicheng Gong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Ionizing Radiation and Complex DNA Damage: From Prediction to Detection Challenges and Biological Significance.

Authors:  Ifigeneia V Mavragani; Zacharenia Nikitaki; Spyridon A Kalospyros; Alexandros G Georgakilas
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  Histone Variant H2A.J Marks Persistent DNA Damage and Triggers the Secretory Phenotype in Radiation-Induced Senescence.

Authors:  Anna Isermann; Carl Mann; Claudia E Rübe
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Human skin aging is associated with increased expression of the histone variant H2A.J in the epidermis.

Authors:  Claudia E Rübe; Caroline Bäumert; Nadine Schuler; Anna Isermann; Zoé Schmal; Matthias Glanemann; Carl Mann; Harry Scherthan
Journal:  NPJ Aging Mech Dis       Date:  2021-04-01

Review 9.  In Situ Detection of Complex DNA Damage Using Microscopy: A Rough Road Ahead.

Authors:  Zacharenia Nikitaki; Eloise Pariset; Damir Sudar; Sylvain V Costes; Alexandros G Georgakilas
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 6.639

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.