Literature DB >> 27199295

What consumers don't know about genetically modified food, and how that affects beliefs.

Brandon R McFadden1, Jayson L Lusk2.   

Abstract

In the debates surrounding biotechnology and genetically modified (GM) food, data from consumer polls are often presented as evidence for precaution and labeling. But how much do consumers actually know about the issue? New data collected from a nationwide U.S. survey reveal low levels of knowledge and numerous misperceptions about GM food. Nearly equal numbers of consumers prefer mandatory labeling of foods containing DNA as do those preferring mandatory labeling of GM foods. When given the option, the majority of consumers prefer that decisions about GM food be taken out of their hands and be made by experts. After answering a list of questions testing objective knowledge of GM food, subjective, self-reported knowledge declines somewhat, and beliefs about GM food safety increase slightly. Results suggest that consumers think they know more than they actually do about GM food, and queries about GM facts cause respondents to reassess how much they know. The findings question the usefulness of results from opinion polls as a motivation for creating public policy surrounding GM food.-McFadden, B. R., Lusk, J. L. What consumers don't know about genetically modified food, and how that affects beliefs. © FASEB.

Keywords:  GM food; labeling; public acceptance; public knowledge

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27199295     DOI: 10.1096/fj.201600598

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FASEB J        ISSN: 0892-6638            Impact factor:   5.191


  7 in total

1.  Is Information Asymmetry a Disruptive Factor in Food Consumer Behavior During the COVID Pandemic?

Authors:  Marian Socoliuc; Veronica Grosu; Marius-Sorin Ciubotariu; Simona-Maria Brînzaru; Cristina Gabriela Cosmulese
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-06-30

2.  Dissuasive effect, information provision, and consumer reactions to the term 'Biotechnology': The case of reproductive interventions in farmed fish.

Authors:  Micaela M Kulesz; Torbjörn Lundh; Dirk-Jan De Koning; Carl-Johan Lagerkvist
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  GM trust shaped by trust determinants with the impact of risk/benefit framework: the contingent role of food technology neophobia.

Authors:  Sumran Ali; Muhammad Asim Nawaz; Muhammad Ghufran; Sumaira Nazar Hussain; Aljaifi Saddam Hussein Mohammed
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.074

4.  Gene-Edited Meat: Disentangling Consumers' Attitudes and Potential Purchase Behavior.

Authors:  Daniel Martin-Collado; Tim J Byrne; Jonh J Crowley; Tom Kirk; Guillermo Ripoll; C B A Whitelaw
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-04-05

5.  Canadian Consumer Preferences Regarding Gene-Edited Food Products.

Authors:  Oswaldo Vasquez; Hayley Hesseln; Stuart J Smyth
Journal:  Front Genome Ed       Date:  2022-04-11

6.  The future of CRISPR gene editing according to plant scientists.

Authors:  Job de Lange; Lawton Lanier Nalley; Wei Yang; Aaron Shew; Hans de Steur
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-08-25

7.  Gene editing isn't just about food: comments from U.S. focus groups.

Authors:  Brandon R McFadden; Joy N Rumble; Kathryn A Stofer; Kevin M Folta; Savanna Turner; Adam Pollack
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 3.118

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.