Literature DB >> 2719896

An investigation of premedication with morphine given by the buccal or intramuscular route.

K H Simpson1, I C Tring, F R Ellis.   

Abstract

1. Premedication with 30 mg buccal morphine or 10 mg intramuscular morphine was evaluated in 40 healthy women undergoing major gynaecological surgery. 2. Buccal administration of morphine produced lower plasma morphine concentrations than intramuscular injection of morphine (P less than 0.01). 3. The mean systemic availability of the buccal tablet, during the first 5 h after administration, was approximately 3% relative to that of the intramuscular preparation. 4. Poor absorption of buccal morphine resulted in inadequate sedation prior to surgery and poor post-operative analgesia. 5. Patients experienced difficulty with the buccal formulation of morphine; tablet bitterness and failure to dissolve were particular problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2719896      PMCID: PMC1379838          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1989.tb05380.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  8 in total

1.  Narcotics in preanesthetic medication; a controlled study.

Authors:  E N COHEN; H K BEECHER
Journal:  J Am Med Assoc       Date:  1951-12-22

2.  Serum morphine concentrations after buccal and intramuscular morphine administration.

Authors:  A P Fisher; C Fung; M Hanna
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Premedication by controlled-release morphine.

Authors:  B Kay; T E Healy
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  Critical evaluation of the potential error in pharmacokinetic studies of using the linear trapezoidal rule method for the calculation of the area under the plasma level--time curve.

Authors:  W L Chiou
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1978-12

5.  Buccal morphine premedication. A double-blind comparison with intramuscular morphine.

Authors:  A P Fisher; P Vine; J Whitlock; M Hanna
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 6.955

6.  Absorption of buccal morphine. A comparison with slow-release morphine sulphate.

Authors:  A P Fisher; C Fung; M Hanna
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 6.955

7.  Buccal morphine--a new route for analgesia?

Authors:  M D Bell; G R Murray; P Mishra; T N Calvey; B D Weldon; N E Williams
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-01-12       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Comparison of oral slow release morphine (MST) with intramuscular morphine for premedication.

Authors:  C A Pinnock; D R Derbyshire; A E Elling; G Smith
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 6.955

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Preoperative oral administration of fast-release morphine sulfate reduces postoperative piritramide consumption.

Authors:  Ana Reiter; Ernest Zulus; Thomas Hartmann; Klaus Hoerauf
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 1.704

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.