Literature DB >> 27198604

Predictors of Heavy Stethoscope Contamination Following a Physical Examination.

Clément Tschopp1, Alexis Schneider1, Yves Longtin1, Gesuele Renzi1, Jacques Schrenzel1, Didier Pittet1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND The degree of bacterial contamination of stethoscopes can vary significantly following a physical examination. OBJECTIVE To conduct a prospective study to investigate the impact of various environmental and patient characteristics on stethoscope contamination. METHODS Following a standardized examination, the levels of bacterial contamination of 4 regions of the physicians' hands and 2 sections of the stethoscopes, and the presence of different pathogenic bacteria, were assessed. Predictors of heavy stethoscope contamination were identified through multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS In total, 392 surfaces were sampled following examination of 56 patients. The microorganisms most frequently recovered from hands and stethoscopes were Enterococcus spp. (29% and 20%, respectively) and Enterobacteriaceae (16% and 7%, respectively). Staphylococcus aureus (either methicillin susceptible or resistant), extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, and Acinetobacter baumannii were recovered from 4%-9% of the samples from either hands or stethoscopes. There was a correlation between the likelihood of recovering these pathogens from the stethoscopes vs from the physicians' hands (ρ=0.79; P=.04). The level of patient's skin contamination was an independent predictor of contamination of the stethoscope diaphragm (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.001; P=.007) and tube (aOR, 1.001; P=.003). Male sex (aOR, 28.24; P=.01) and reception of a bed bath (aOR, 7.52; P=.048) were also independently associated with heavy tube contamination. CONCLUSIONS Stethoscope contamination following a single physical examination is not negligible and is associated with the level of contamination of the patient's skin. Prevention of pathogen dissemination is needed. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:673-679.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27198604     DOI: 10.1017/ice.2016.40

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol        ISSN: 0899-823X            Impact factor:   3.254


  4 in total

1.  Molecular analysis of bacterial contamination on stethoscopes in an intensive care unit.

Authors:  Vincent R Knecht; John E McGinniss; Hari M Shankar; Erik L Clarke; Brendan J Kelly; Ize Imai; Ayannah S Fitzgerald; Kyle Bittinger; Frederic D Bushman; Ronald G Collman
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 3.254

2.  Use of 90% ethanol to decontaminate stethoscopes in resource limited settings.

Authors:  Bijendra Raj Raghubanshi; Supriya Sapkota; Arjab Adhikari; Aman Dutta; Utsuk Bhattarai; Rastriyata Bhandari
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 4.887

3.  Aseptic Barriers Allow a Clean Contact for Contaminated Stethoscope Diaphragms.

Authors:  Rajiv Vasudevan; Ji H Shin; Jessica Chopyk; William F Peacock; Francesca J Torriani; Alan S Maisel; David T Pride
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes       Date:  2020-02-05

4.  Infections and Smartphone Use in Nursing Practice: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sofia Di Mario; Sara Dionisi; Emanuele Di Simone; Gloria Liquori; Claudia Cianfrocca; Marco Di Muzio; Noemi Giannetta
Journal:  Florence Nightingale J Nurs       Date:  2022-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.