Literature DB >> 27198111

Quality of Health IT Evaluations.

Pirkko Nykänen1, Johanna Kaipio2.   

Abstract

Health IT evaluation studies have often been found to be of limited quality. To address this problem, several guidelines and frameworks have been developed as tools to support improvement of the quality of evaluation studies. In this contribution, we review available guidelines and then present the Good Evaluation Practice Guideline in Health Informatics (GEP-HI) in more detail. GEP-HI is a comprehensive guideline which supports especially planning and execution of a health IT evaluation study. The GEP-HI guideline helps to overcome the quality problems related to weak study planning and methodological study design. We also discuss application of GEP-HI on an evaluation project and discuss the need to publish systematically following the recognised publication guidelines. Finally we discuss the future trend on multi-method evaluation approaches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27198111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform        ISSN: 0926-9630


  3 in total

Review 1.  Improving Evaluation to Address the Unintended Consequences of Health Information Technology:. a Position Paper from the Working Group on Technology Assessment & Quality Development.

Authors:  F Magrabi; E Ammenwerth; H Hyppönen; N de Keizer; P Nykänen; M Rigby; P Scott; J Talmon; A Georgiou
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2016-11-10

Review 2.  Electronic Tools to Bridge the Language Gap in Health Care for People Who Have Migrated: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Frédérique Thonon; Swati Perrot; Abhijna Vithal Yergolkar; Olivia Rousset-Torrente; James W Griffith; Olivier Chassany; Martin Duracinsky
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  Online Guide for Electronic Health Evaluation Approaches: Systematic Scoping Review and Concept Mapping Study.

Authors:  Tobias N Bonten; Anneloek Rauwerdink; Jeremy C Wyatt; Marise J Kasteleyn; Leonard Witkamp; Heleen Riper; Lisette Jewc van Gemert-Pijnen; Kathrin Cresswell; Aziz Sheikh; Marlies P Schijven; Niels H Chavannes
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 5.428

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.