Literature DB >> 27197986

Computational Modeling of Venous Sinus Stenosis in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

M R Levitt1,2,3, P M McGah3, K Moon4, F C Albuquerque4, C G McDougall4, M Y S Kalani4, L J Kim5,2, A Aliseda3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension has been associated with dural venous sinus stenosis in some patients, but the hemodynamic environment of the dural venous sinuses has not been quantitatively described. Here, we present the first such computational fluid dynamics model by using patient-specific blood pressure measurements.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension and at least 1 stenosis or atresia at the transverse/sigmoid sinus junction underwent MR venography followed by cerebral venography and manometry throughout the dural venous sinuses. Patient-specific computational fluid dynamics models were created by using MR venography anatomy, with venous pressure measurements as boundary conditions. Blood flow and wall shear stress were calculated for each patient.
RESULTS: Computational models of the dural venous sinuses were successfully reconstructed in all 6 patients with patient-specific boundary conditions. Three patients demonstrated a pathologic pressure gradient (≥8 mm Hg) across 4 dural venous sinus stenoses. Small sample size precludes statistical comparisons, but average overall flow throughout the dural venous sinuses of patients with pathologic pressure gradients was higher than in those without them (1041.00 ± 506.52 mL/min versus 358.00 ± 190.95 mL/min). Wall shear stress was also higher across stenoses in patients with pathologic pressure gradients (37.66 ± 48.39 Pa versus 7.02 ± 13.60 Pa).
CONCLUSIONS: The hemodynamic environment of the dural venous sinuses can be computationally modeled by using patient-specific anatomy and physiologic measurements in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension. There was substantially higher blood flow and wall shear stress in patients with pathologic pressure gradients.
© 2016 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27197986      PMCID: PMC5116292          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4826

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  23 in total

Review 1.  Physiology of cerebral venous blood flow: from experimental data in animals to normal function in humans.

Authors:  B Schaller
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  2004-11

2.  A computational study on the influence of catheter-delivered intravascular probes on blood flow in a coronary artery model.

Authors:  Ryo Torii; Nigel B Wood; Alun D Hughes; Simon A Thom; Jazmin Aguado-Sierra; Justin E Davies; Darrel P Francis; Kim H Parker; X Yun Xu
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Transverse sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a review of 52 patients and of model predictions.

Authors:  R M Ahmed; M Wilkinson; G D Parker; M J Thurtell; J Macdonald; P J McCluskey; R Allan; V Dunne; M Hanlon; B K Owler; G M Halmagyi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Intracranial venous sinus stenting for benign intracranial hypertension: clinical indications, technique, and preliminary results.

Authors:  Felipe C Albuquerque; Shervin R Dashti; Yin C Hu; C Benjamin Newman; Mohamed Teleb; Cameron G McDougall; Harold L Rekate
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.104

5.  Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Venography is Correlated With Intravenous Pressures Before and After Venous Sinus Stenting: Implications for Treatment and Monitoring.

Authors:  Darian R Esfahani; Matthew Stevenson; Heather E Moss; Sepideh Amin-Hanjani; Victor Aletich; Sachin Jain; Fady T Charbel; Ali Alaraj
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Cerebral MR venography: normal anatomy and potential diagnostic pitfalls.

Authors:  R H Ayanzen; C R Bird; P J Keller; F J McCully; M R Theobald; J E Heiserman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: the prevalence and morphology of sinovenous stenosis.

Authors:  R I Farb; I Vanek; J N Scott; D J Mikulis; R A Willinsky; G Tomlinson; K G terBrugge
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Sensitivity of patient-specific numerical simulation of cerebal aneurysm hemodynamics to inflow boundary conditions.

Authors:  Prem Venugopal; Daniel Valentino; Holger Schmitt; J Pablo Villablanca; Fernando Viñuela; Gary Duckwiler
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 9.  Venous sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Ross C Puffer; Wessam Mustafa; Giuseppe Lanzino
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 5.836

10.  Accuracy of computational cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics using patient-specific endovascular measurements.

Authors:  Patrick M McGah; Michael R Levitt; Michael C Barbour; Ryan P Morton; John D Nerva; Pierre D Mourad; Basavaraj V Ghodke; Danial K Hallam; Laligam N Sekhar; Louis J Kim; Alberto Aliseda
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 3.934

View more
  3 in total

1.  Prediction of the trans-stenotic pressure gradient with arteriography-derived hemodynamic features in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Authors:  Yupeng Zhang; Chao Ma; Changxuan Li; Xiaoqing Li; Raynald Liu; Minke Liu; Haoyu Zhu; Fei Liang; Yilong Wang; Kehui Dong; Chuhan Jiang; Zhongrong Miao; Dapeng Mo
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 6.960

Review 2.  Anatomy imaging and hemodynamics research on the cerebral vein and venous sinus among individuals without cranial sinus and jugular vein diseases.

Authors:  Lu Liu; Yan Wu; Kaiyuan Zhang; Ran Meng; Jiangang Duan; Chen Zhou; Xunming Ji
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 5.152

3.  MR Venous Flow in Sigmoid Sinus Diverticulum.

Authors:  M R Amans; H Haraldsson; E Kao; S Kefayati; K Meisel; R Khangura; J Leach; N D Jani; F Faraji; M Ballweber; W Smith; D Saloner
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.825

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.