David N Karp1, Catherine S Wolff1, Douglas J Wiebe1, Charles C Branas1, Brendan G Carr1, Michael T Mullen2. 1. From the Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology (D.N.K., D.J.W., C.C.B.), Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (D.J.W., C.C.B., M.T.M.), and Department of Neurology (M.T.M.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Department of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (B.G.C.); and Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC (C.S.W.). 2. From the Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology (D.N.K., D.J.W., C.C.B.), Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (D.J.W., C.C.B., M.T.M.), and Department of Neurology (M.T.M.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Department of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (B.G.C.); and Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC (C.S.W.). Michael.mullen@uphs.upenn.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The stroke belt is described as an 8-state region with high stroke mortality across the southeastern United States. Using spatial statistics, we identified clusters of high stroke mortality (hot spots) and adjacent areas of low stroke mortality (cool spots) for US counties and evaluated for regional differences in county-level risk factors. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of stroke mortality was conducted using Multiple Cause of Death data (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) to compute age-adjusted adult stroke mortality rates for US counties. Local indicators of spatial association statistics were used for hot-spot mapping. County-level variables were compared between hot and cool spots. RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2010, there were 393 121 stroke-related deaths. Median age-adjusted adult stroke mortality was 61.7 per 100 000 persons (interquartile range=51.4-74.7). We identified 705 hot-spot counties (22.4%) and 234 cool-spot counties (7.5%); 44.5% of hot-spot counties were located outside of the stroke belt. Hot spots had greater proportions of black residents, higher rates of unemployment, chronic disease, and healthcare utilization, and lower median income and educational attainment. CONCLUSIONS: Clusters of high stroke mortality exist beyond the 8-state stroke belt, and variation exists within the stroke belt. Reconsideration of the stroke belt definition and increased attention to local determinants of health underlying small area regional variability could inform targeted healthcare interventions.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The stroke belt is described as an 8-state region with high stroke mortality across the southeastern United States. Using spatial statistics, we identified clusters of high stroke mortality (hot spots) and adjacent areas of low stroke mortality (cool spots) for US counties and evaluated for regional differences in county-level risk factors. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of stroke mortality was conducted using Multiple Cause of Death data (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) to compute age-adjusted adult stroke mortality rates for US counties. Local indicators of spatial association statistics were used for hot-spot mapping. County-level variables were compared between hot and cool spots. RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2010, there were 393 121 stroke-related deaths. Median age-adjusted adult stroke mortality was 61.7 per 100 000 persons (interquartile range=51.4-74.7). We identified 705 hot-spot counties (22.4%) and 234 cool-spot counties (7.5%); 44.5% of hot-spot counties were located outside of the stroke belt. Hot spots had greater proportions of black residents, higher rates of unemployment, chronic disease, and healthcare utilization, and lower median income and educational attainment. CONCLUSIONS: Clusters of high stroke mortality exist beyond the 8-state stroke belt, and variation exists within the stroke belt. Reconsideration of the stroke belt definition and increased attention to local determinants of health underlying small area regional variability could inform targeted healthcare interventions.
Authors: Virginia J Howard; Mary Cushman; Leavonne Pulley; Camilo R Gomez; Rodney C Go; Ronald J Prineas; Andra Graham; Claudia S Moy; George Howard Journal: Neuroepidemiology Date: 2005-06-29 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: George Howard; Mary Cushman; Brett M Kissela; Dawn O Kleindorfer; Leslie A McClure; Monika M Safford; J David Rhodes; Elsayed Z Soliman; Claudia S Moy; Suzanne E Judd; Virginia J Howard Journal: Stroke Date: 2011-09-29 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Karen C Albright; Charles C Branas; Brett C Meyer; Dawn E Matherne-Meyer; Justin A Zivin; Patrick D Lyden; Brendan G Carr Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2010-10
Authors: Michael T Mullen; Suzanne Judd; Virginia J Howard; Scott E Kasner; Charles C Branas; Karen C Albright; J David Rhodes; Dawn O Kleindorfer; Brendan G Carr Journal: Stroke Date: 2013-05-02 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Michael T Mullen; Douglas J Wiebe; Ariel Bowman; Catherine S Wolff; Karen C Albright; Jason Roy; Laura J Balcer; Charles C Branas; Brendan G Carr Journal: Stroke Date: 2014-10-09 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Samuel Cykert; Thomas C Keyserling; Michael Pignone; Darren DeWalt; Bryan J Weiner; Justin G Trogdon; Thomas Wroth; Jacqueline Halladay; Monique Mackey; Jason Fine; Jung In Kim; Crystal Cene Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2020-10-13 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Justin Xavier Moore; Kendra J Royston; Marvin E Langston; Russell Griffin; Bertha Hidalgo; Henry E Wang; Graham Colditz; Tomi Akinyemiju Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2018-06-19 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Kristen M George; Rachel L Peterson; Paola Gilsanz; Lisa L Barnes; Elizabeth Rose Mayeda; M Maria Glymour; Dan M Mungas; Charles S DeCarli; Rachel A Whitmer Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2021-09-09 Impact factor: 3.797