David N Rosenthal1, Christopher S Almond2, Robert D Jaquiss3, Christine E Peyton4, Scott R Auerbach5, David R Morales6, Deirdre J Epstein7, Ryan S Cantor8, Robert L Kormos9, David C Naftel10, Ryan J Butts11, Nancy S Ghanayem12, James K Kirklin10, Elizabeth D Blume13. 1. Department of Pediatric (Cardiology), Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA. Electronic address: davidnr@stanford.edu. 2. Department of Pediatric (Cardiology), Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA. 3. Department of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA. 4. Children's Hospital Heart Institute, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA. 5. Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA. 6. Department of Pediatric Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. 7. Department of Pediatric Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA. 8. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA. 9. Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. 10. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA. 11. Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA. 12. Department of Pediatrics (Critical Care Section), Medical College of Wisconsin and Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA. 13. Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ventricular assist devices (VADs) have been used in children on an increasing basis in recent years. One-year survival rates are now >80% in multiple reports. In this report we describe adverse events experienced by children with durable ventricular assist devices, using a national-level registry (PediMACS, a component of INTERMACS) METHODS: PediMACS is a national registry that contains clinical data on patients who are <19 years of age at the time of VAD implantation. Data collection concludes at the time of VAD explantation. All FDA-approved devices are included. PediMACS was launched on September 1, 2012, and this report includes all data from launch until August 2014. Adverse events were coded with a uniform, pre-specified set of definitions. RESULTS: This report comprises data from 200 patients with a median age of 11 years (range 11 days to 18 years), and total follow-up of 783 patient-months. The diagnoses were cardiomyopathy (n = 146, 73%), myocarditis (n = 17, 9%), congenital heart disease (n = 35, 18%) and other (n = 2, 1%). Pulsatile-flow devices were used in 91 patients (45%) and continuous-flow devices in 109 patients (55%). Actuarial survival was 81% at 6 months. There were 418 adverse events reported. The most frequent events were device malfunction (n = 79), infection (n = 78), neurologic dysfunction (n = 52) and bleeding (n = 68). Together, these accounted for 277 events, 66% of the total. Although 38% of patients had no reported adverse event and 16% of patients had ≥5 adverse events. Adverse events occurred at all time-points after implantation, but were most likely to occur in the first 30 days. For continuous-flow devices, there were broad similarities in adverse event rates between this cohort and historic rates from the INTERMACS population. CONCLUSIONS: In this study cohort, the overall rate of early adverse events (within 90 days of implantation) was 86.3 events per 100 patient-months, and of late adverse events it was 20.4 events per 100 patient-months. The most common adverse events in recipients of pulsatile VADs were device malfunction, neurologic dysfunction, bleeding and infection. For continuous-flow VADs, the most common adverse events were infection, bleeding, cardiac arrhythmia, neurologic dysfunction and respiratory failure. Compared with an adult INTERMACS cohort, the overall rate and distribution of adverse events appears similar.
BACKGROUND: Ventricular assist devices (VADs) have been used in children on an increasing basis in recent years. One-year survival rates are now >80% in multiple reports. In this report we describe adverse events experienced by children with durable ventricular assist devices, using a national-level registry (PediMACS, a component of INTERMACS) METHODS:PediMACS is a national registry that contains clinical data on patients who are <19 years of age at the time of VAD implantation. Data collection concludes at the time of VAD explantation. All FDA-approved devices are included. PediMACS was launched on September 1, 2012, and this report includes all data from launch until August 2014. Adverse events were coded with a uniform, pre-specified set of definitions. RESULTS: This report comprises data from 200 patients with a median age of 11 years (range 11 days to 18 years), and total follow-up of 783 patient-months. The diagnoses were cardiomyopathy (n = 146, 73%), myocarditis (n = 17, 9%), congenital heart disease (n = 35, 18%) and other (n = 2, 1%). Pulsatile-flow devices were used in 91 patients (45%) and continuous-flow devices in 109 patients (55%). Actuarial survival was 81% at 6 months. There were 418 adverse events reported. The most frequent events were device malfunction (n = 79), infection (n = 78), neurologic dysfunction (n = 52) and bleeding (n = 68). Together, these accounted for 277 events, 66% of the total. Although 38% of patients had no reported adverse event and 16% of patients had ≥5 adverse events. Adverse events occurred at all time-points after implantation, but were most likely to occur in the first 30 days. For continuous-flow devices, there were broad similarities in adverse event rates between this cohort and historic rates from the INTERMACS population. CONCLUSIONS: In this study cohort, the overall rate of early adverse events (within 90 days of implantation) was 86.3 events per 100 patient-months, and of late adverse events it was 20.4 events per 100 patient-months. The most common adverse events in recipients of pulsatile VADs were device malfunction, neurologic dysfunction, bleeding and infection. For continuous-flow VADs, the most common adverse events were infection, bleeding, cardiac arrhythmia, neurologic dysfunction and respiratory failure. Compared with an adult INTERMACS cohort, the overall rate and distribution of adverse events appears similar.
Authors: Aamir Jeewa; Cedric Manlhiot; Brian W McCrindle; Glen Van Arsdell; Tilman Humpl; Anne I Dipchand Journal: Artif Organs Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 3.094
Authors: Oliver Miera; Evgenij V Potapov; Matthias Redlin; Alexander Stepanenko; Felix Berger; Roland Hetzer; Michael Hübler Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Antonio G Cabrera; Kartik S Sundareswaran; Andres X Samayoa; Aamir Jeewa; E Dean McKenzie; Joseph W Rossano; David J Farrar; O Howard Frazier; David L Morales Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2013-08-31 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: David L S Morales; Christopher S D Almond; Robert D B Jaquiss; David N Rosenthal; David C Naftel; M Patricia Massicotte; Tilman Humpl; Mark W Turrentine; James S Tweddell; Gordon A Cohen; Robert Kroslowitz; Eric J Devaney; Charles E Canter; Francis Fynn-Thompson; Olaf Reinhartz; Michiaki Imamura; Nancy S Ghanayem; Holger Buchholz; Sarah Furness; Robert Mazor; Sanjiv K Gandhi; Charles D Fraser Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: Elizabeth D Blume; David C Naftel; Heather J Bastardi; Brian W Duncan; James K Kirklin; Steven A Webber Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-05-16 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Christopher S Almond; David L Morales; Eugene H Blackstone; Mark W Turrentine; Michiaki Imamura; M Patricia Massicotte; Lori C Jordan; Eric J Devaney; Chitra Ravishankar; Kirk R Kanter; William Holman; Robert Kroslowitz; Christine Tjossem; Lucy Thuita; Gordon A Cohen; Holger Buchholz; James D St Louis; Khanh Nguyen; Robert A Niebler; Henry L Walters; Brian Reemtsen; Peter D Wearden; Olaf Reinhartz; Kristine J Guleserian; Max B Mitchell; Mark S Bleiweis; Charles E Canter; Tilman Humpl Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-03-28 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: S Chris Malaisrie; Marc P Pelletier; James J Yun; Kapil Sharma; Tomasz A Timek; David N Rosenthal; Gail E Wright; Robert C Robbins; Bruce A Reitz Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: Deipanjan Nandi; Kelley D Miller; Carley M Bober; Tami M Rosenthal; Lisa M Montenegro; Joseph W Rossano; J William Gaynor; Christopher E Mascio Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2017-08-16 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: V Vivian Dimas; Brian H Morray; Dennis W Kim; Christopher S Almond; Shabana Shahanavaz; Sebastian C Tume; Lynn F Peng; Doff B McElhinney; Henri Justino Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2017-03-15 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Justin Godown; Andrew H Smith; Cary Thurm; Matt Hall; Debra A Dodd; Jonathan H Soslow; Bret A Mettler; David W Bearl; Brian Feingold Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2018-04-06 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Jeffrey R Gohean; Erik R Larson; Brian H Hsi; Mark Kurusz; Richard W Smalling; Raul G Longoria Journal: ASAIO J Date: 2017 Mar/Apr Impact factor: 2.872
Authors: David M Peng; Devin A Koehl; Ryan S Cantor; Kristen N McMillan; Aliessa P Barnes; Patrick I McConnell; Jessica Jordan; Nicholas D Andersen; James D St Louis; Katsuhide Maeda; James K Kirklin; Steven J Kindel Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2018-10-31 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: Scott R Auerbach; Marc E Richmond; Kurt R Schumacher; Dalia Lopez-Colon; Max B Mitchell; Mark W Turrentine; Ryan S Cantor; Robert A Niebler; Pirooz Eghtesady Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2017-10-03 Impact factor: 10.247