Literature DB >> 24002006

Outcomes of pediatric patients supported by the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device in the United States.

Antonio G Cabrera1, Kartik S Sundareswaran, Andres X Samayoa, Aamir Jeewa, E Dean McKenzie, Joseph W Rossano, David J Farrar, O Howard Frazier, David L Morales.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The HeartMate II (HMII; Thoratec, Pleasanton, CA) continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is an established treatment modality for advanced heart failure in adults. The objective of this study was to evaluate outcomes of pediatric patients supported by the HMII LVAD.
METHODS: This was a retrospective review of the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) of patients supported with a HMII from April 2008 to September 2011. The primary cohort comprised pediatric patients aged 11 to 18 years. Outcomes were compared with a group of young adults aged 19 to 39 years who underwent HMII implant during the same period. Ischemic etiologies for heart failure were excluded.
RESULTS: There were 28 pediatric patients, of whom 19 (68%) were males, 14 (46%) were African American, and 7 (25%) underwent device placement in a pediatric hospital. Competing outcomes analysis showed that at 6 months of follow-up, the composite of survival to transplantation, ongoing support, or recovery was 96% for the pediatric group, which was not significantly different from the young adult group (96%, p = 0.330). The 2 groups had similar INTERMACS profiles but differed in diagnosis, weight, and morbidities. Bleeding complications requiring surgical intervention were more common in the pediatric group.
CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric outcomes with a HMII LVAD are comparable to that of young adults. As we continue to monitor this growing group, more sophisticated characterization and comparisons will be possible. Also, as technology progress and second- and third-generation devices are introduced, the number of children who will benefit from mechanical support will continue to grow.
© 2013 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HeartMate II; outcomes; pediatric; small adults; ventricular assist device

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24002006     DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2013.07.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  19 in total

1.  Titanium Plug Closure after HeartWare Ventricular Assist Device Explantation in a 15-Year-Old Girl: First U.S. Experience.

Authors:  Diego A Lara; Aamir Jeewa; Barbara A Elias; Elizabeth O McCullum; Susan W Denfield; William J Dreyer; Iki Adachi
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2017-02-01

2.  Early Biventricular Assist Device Use in Children: A Single-Center Review of 31 Patients.

Authors:  Jacob R Miller; Deirdre J Epstein; Matthew C Henn; Tracey Guthrie; Richard B Schuessler; Kathleen E Simpson; Charles E Canter; Pirooz Eghtesady; Umar S Boston
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.872

3.  Clinical results with Jarvik 2000 axial flow left ventricular assist device: Osaka University Experience.

Authors:  Daisuke Yoshioka; Goro Matsumiya; Koichi Toda; Taichi Sakaguchi; Yasushi Yoshikawa; Shunsuke Saito; Hikaru Matsuda; Yoshiki Sawa
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 4.  Stroke in children with cardiac disease: report from the International Pediatric Stroke Study Group Symposium.

Authors:  Adriane J Sinclair; Christine K Fox; Rebecca N Ichord; Christopher S Almond; Timothy J Bernard; Lauren A Beslow; Anthony K C Chan; Michael Cheung; Gabrielle deVeber; Michael M Dowling; Neil Friedman; Therese M Giglia; Kristin P Guilliams; Tilman Humpl; Daniel J Licht; Mark T Mackay; Lori C Jordan
Journal:  Pediatr Neurol       Date:  2014-10-05       Impact factor: 3.372

Review 5.  Current approaches to device implantation in pediatric and congenital heart disease patients.

Authors:  Jacob R Miller; Timothy S Lancaster; Pirooz Eghtesady
Journal:  Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2015-03-03

Review 6.  Ventricular assist device use in congenital heart disease with a comparison to heart transplant.

Authors:  Jacob R Miller; Pirooz Eghtesady
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.744

7.  Adverse events in children implanted with ventricular assist devices in the United States: Data from the Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory Support (PediMACS).

Authors:  David N Rosenthal; Christopher S Almond; Robert D Jaquiss; Christine E Peyton; Scott R Auerbach; David R Morales; Deirdre J Epstein; Ryan S Cantor; Robert L Kormos; David C Naftel; Ryan J Butts; Nancy S Ghanayem; James K Kirklin; Elizabeth D Blume
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 10.247

Review 8.  Pediatric ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Iki Adachi; Sarah Burki; Farhan Zafar; David Luis Simon Morales
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 9.  An overview of mechanical circulatory support in single-ventricle patients.

Authors:  Jacob R Miller; Timothy S Lancaster; Connor Callahan; Aaron M Abarbanell; Pirooz Eghtesady
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2018-04

10.  Implantation of a HeartMate 3 in a 13-Year-Old Child with Dilated Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Raymond Pfister; Matthias Kirsch; Julia Natterer; Stefano Di Bernardo; Rene Pretre
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2019-11-02       Impact factor: 1.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.