Literature DB >> 27197271

Effects of a Structured Exercise Program on Physical Activity and Fitness in Colon Cancer Survivors: One Year Feasibility Results from the CHALLENGE Trial.

Kerry S Courneya1, Janette L Vardy2, Christopher J O'Callaghan3, Christine M Friedenreich4, Kristin L Campbell5, Harry Prapavessis6, Jennifer J Crawford7, Patti O'Brien3, Haryana M Dhillon2, Derek J Jonker8, Neil S Chua9, Sasha Lupichuk10, Michael S Sanatani11, Sharlene Gill12, Ralph M Meyer13, Stephen Begbie14, Tony Bonaventura15, Matthew E Burge16, Jane Turner2, Dongsheng Tu3, Christopher M Booth17.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is strong interest in testing lifestyle interventions to improve cancer outcomes; however, the optimal methods for achieving behavior change in large-scale pragmatic trials are unknown. Here, we report the 1-year feasibility results for exercise behavior change in the Canadian Cancer Trials Group CO.21 (CHALLENGE) Trial.
METHODS: Between 2009 and 2014, 273 high-risk stage II and III colon cancer survivors from 42 centers in Canada and Australia were randomized to a structured exercise program (SEP; n = 136) or health education materials (HEM; n = 137). The primary feasibility outcome in a prespecified interim analysis was a difference between randomized groups of ≥5 metabolic equivalent task (MET)-hours/week in self-reported recreational physical activity (PA) after at least 250 participants reached the 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes included health-related fitness.
RESULTS: The SEP group reported an increase in recreational PA of 15.6 MET-hours/week compared with 5.1 MET-hours/week in the HEM group [mean difference = +10.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) = +3.1-+17.9; P = 0.002]. The SEP group also improved relative to the HEM group in predicted VO2max (P = 0.068), 6-minute walk (P < 0.001), 30-second chair stand (P < 0.001), 8-foot up-and-go (P = 0.004), and sit-and-reach (P = 0.08).
CONCLUSIONS: The behavior change intervention in the CHALLENGE Trial produced a substantial increase in self-reported recreational PA that met the feasibility criterion for trial continuation, resulted in objective fitness improvements, and is consistent with the amount of PA associated with improved colon cancer outcomes in observational studies. IMPACT: The CHALLENGE Trial is poised to determine the causal effects of PA on colon cancer outcomes. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(6); 969-77. ©2016 AACR. ©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27197271     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-1267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  27 in total

Review 1.  Survivorship Guidance for Patients with Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Jillian Simard; Suneel Kamath; Sheetal Kircher
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-04-01

Review 2.  The Importance of Body Composition in Explaining the Overweight Paradox in Cancer-Counterpoint.

Authors:  Bette J Caan; Elizabeth M Cespedes Feliciano; Candyce H Kroenke
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2018-04-15       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Exercise guidelines for cancer survivors: are fitness and quality-of-life benefits enough to change practice?

Authors:  K S Courneya
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 4.  Energy balance and gastrointestinal cancer: risk, interventions, outcomes and mechanisms.

Authors:  Cornelia M Ulrich; Caroline Himbert; Andreana N Holowatyj; Stephen D Hursting
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 46.802

5.  CHALLENGE Trial 1 Year Feasibility Results-Letter.

Authors:  Claire H Pernar; Sarah C Markt; Rana R McKay; Lorelei A Mucci
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Physical Activity in Cancer Prevention and Survival: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Anne McTiernan; Christine M Friedenreich; Peter T Katzmarzyk; Kenneth E Powell; Richard Macko; David Buchner; Linda S Pescatello; Bonny Bloodgood; Bethany Tennant; Alison Vaux-Bjerke; Stephanie M George; Richard P Troiano; Katrina L Piercy
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Oncology care provider perspectives on exercise promotion in people with cancer: an examination of knowledge, practices, barriers, and facilitators.

Authors:  Michelle Nadler; Daryl Bainbridge; Jennifer Tomasone; Oren Cheifetz; Rosalyn A Juergens; Jonathan Sussman
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Phase II Feasibility Study of a Weight Loss Intervention in Female Breast and Colorectal Cancer Survivors (SWOG S1008).

Authors:  Heather Greenlee; Danika L Lew; Dawn L Hershman; Vicky A Newman; Lisa Hansen; Sheri J Hartman; Judith Korner; Zaixing Shi; Christine L Sardo Molmenti; Antoine Sayegh; Lou Fehrenbacher; Shelly Lo; Jennifer Klemp; Kristine Rinn; John M Robertson; Joseph Unger; Julie Gralow; Kathy Albain; Robert Krouse; Carol Fabian
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 5.002

9.  SurvivorCHESS to increase physical activity in colon cancer survivors: can we get them moving?

Authors:  Deborah K Mayer; Gina Landucci; Lola Awoyinka; Amy K Atwood; Cindy L Carmack; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Fiona McTavish; David H Gustafson
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 4.442

10.  Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of an exercise telephone counseling intervention for hematologic cancer survivors: a phase II randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  James R Vallerand; Ryan E Rhodes; Gordon J Walker; Kerry S Courneya
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 4.442

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.